The Importance of Analyzing and Standardizing Surgical Methods

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 122-125

  Stark, Michael ^a   Gerli, S ^b   Di Renzo, G C ^b  

^a Helios Hospital   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Surgery; Surgical method; Surgical technique; Vaginal hysterectomy; Vaginal prolapse; Vaginal surgery

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STANDARDIZATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 68749102146     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Pfannenstiel J. On the advantages of a transverse cut of the fascia above the symphysis for gynecological laparotomies, and advice on surgical methods and indications. Samml Klin Votr Gynäkol 68 (1897) 98
2. Mowat J., and Bonnar J. Abdominal wound dehiscence after cesarean section. Br Med J 2 (1971) 256-257
3. Everett R.B. Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a report of 26 cases. J Okla State Med Assoc 86 (1993) 487-491
4. Stanojević D., Sćepanović R., Perunović R., et al. Advantages of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in comparison with the traditional approach. Acta Chir Iugosl 44-45 (1997-1998) 49-51
5. Copǎescu C., Munteanu R., Iosifescu R., et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Chirurgia (Bucur) 102 (2007) 161-167
6. Karaman Y., and Bingol B. Günenç Z. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14 (2007) 78-84
7. Cravello L., Bretelle F., Cohen D., et al. Vaginal hysterectomy: apropos of a series of 1008 interventions. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 29 (2001) 288-294
8. Kalogirou D., Antoniou G., Zioris C., et al. Vaginal hysterectomy: technique and results in the last twenty years. J Gynecol Surg 11 (1995) 201-207
9. Claerhout F., and Deprest J. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19 (2005) 357-375
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 105 (2005) 929-930
11. Leodolter S. The transvaginal surgical school in Austria: retrospect-present-future. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 35 (1995) 142-148
12. Falk H.C., and Soichet S. The technique of vaginal hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15 (1972) 703-754
13. Joel-Cohen S.J. Abdominal and Vaginal Hysterectomy. New Techniques Based on Time and Motion Studies (1972), William Heinemann, London
14. Paldi E., Filmar S., Naiger R., et al. Vaginal hysterectomy using the Porges method: report on 100 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 17 (1988) 233-236
15. Von Theobald P. Simplified vaginal hysterectomy. J Chir (Paris) 138 (2001) 93-98
16. Heaney N.S. Vaginal hysterectomy-its indications and technique. Am J Surg 56 (1940) 284-288
17. Janschek E.C., Hohlagschwandtner M., Nather A., et al. A study of nonclosure of the peritoneum at vaginal hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267 (2003) 213-216
18. Stark M. Clinical evidence that suturing the peritoneum after laparotomy is unnecessary for healing. World J Surg 17 (1993) 419
19. Lipscomb G.H., Ling F.W., Stovall T.G., et al. Peritoneal closure at vaginal hysterectomy: a reassessment. Obstet Gynecol 87 (1996) 40-43
20. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Peritoneal Closure Guideline No. 15 (2002), Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, London
21. Stark M., Gerli S., and Di Renzo G.C. The ten-step vaginal hysterectomy. Prog Obstet Gynaecol 17 (2006) 358-368
22. Holmgren G., Sjöholm L., and Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78 (1999) 615-621
23. Villar J., Valladares E., Wojdyla D., et al. Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 367 (2006) 1819-1829
24. Martin J.A., Kung H.C., Mathews T.J., et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics 121 (2008) 788-801
25. Usha Kiran T.S., and Jayawickrama N.S. Who is responsible for the rising cesarean section rate?. J Obstet Gynaecol 22 (2002) 363-365
26. Dinas K., Mavromatidis G., Dovas D., et al. Current cesarean delivery rates and indications in a major public hospital in northern Greece. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48 (2008) 142-146
27. Kulaš T., Habek D., Karša M., et al. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience. Gynecol Obstet Invest 65 (2008) 222-226
28. Björklund K., Kimaro M., Urassa E., et al. Introduction of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section at an African tertiary center: a randomized controlled trial. BJOG 107 (2000) 209-216
29. Messalli E.M., Cobellis L., and Pierno G. Cesarean section according to Stark. Minerva Ginecol 53 (2001) 367-371
30. Nabhan A.F. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100 (2008) 69-75
31. Campbell E.S., Xiao H., and Smith M.K. Types of hysterectomy: comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes. J Reprod Med 48 (2003) 943-949
32. Meikle S.F., Nugent E.W., and Orleans M. Complications and recovery from laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 89 (1997) 304-311
33. Kudo R., Yamauchi O., Okazaki T., et al. Vaginal hysterectomy without ligation of the ligaments of the cervix uteri. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170 (1990) 299-305
34. Miskry T., and Magos A. Mass closure: a new technique for closure of the vaginal vault at vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108 (2001) 1295-1297