Monitoring: The slow cousin of evaluation, or an equal partner?

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 8-13

  De Boer, Marc ^a  

^a Centre for Operational Research and Evaluation in the NZ Ministry of Social Development   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954525987     PISSN: 1035719X     EISSN: 25159372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1035719X0100100204     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson Diane, 1998, What Have We Learned and Where to Next? A Review of Evaluations of Employment Programs, 1994-1997, Labour Market Policy Group, Department of Labour, Wellington, New Zealand
2. Bernstein David J., 1999, ‘Comments on Perrin's “Effective use and misuse of performance management”’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85–93
3. Blalock Ann Bonar, 1999, ‘Evaluation research and the performance management movement’, Evaluation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 245–258
4. Davies Ian C., 1999, ‘Evaluation and performance management in government’, Evaluation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 150–159
5. de Boer Marc, 2001a, Review of the Subsidised Work Appropriation, Department of Work and Income, Wellington, New Zealand
6. de Boer Marc, 2001b, Methodology of the Review of the Subsidised Work Appropriation, Department of Work and Income, Wellington, New Zealand
7. de Boer Marc, 2001c, Six-monthly Review of DWI Employment Programs, Department of Work and Income, August 2001, Wellington, New Zealand
8. Funnell Sue, 1997, ‘Program logic: An adaptable tool for designing and evaluating programs’, Evaluation News & Comment, vol. 6, no. 1, July, pp. 5–17
9. Lipsey Mark, 2000, ‘Meta-analysis and the learning curve in evaluation practice’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 207–212
10. Newcomer, Kathryn E., 1997, ‘Using performance measurement to improve programs’, in Using Performance Measurement to Improve Public and Non-profit Programs, ed. Kathryn E., Newcomer, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 75, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
11. Pawson Ray, & Tilley Nick, 1997, Realistic Evaluation, Sage Publications, London
12. Perrin Burt, 1998, ‘Effective use and misuse of performance measurement’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 21, no. 2
13. Perrin Burt, 1999, ‘Performance measurement: Does the reality match the rhetoric?’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 101–111
14. Rossi P., & Freeman H., 1994, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
15. Scheirer Mary Ann, 2000, ‘Getting more “bang” for your performance “buck”’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 139–149
16. Wholey J. S., 1997, ‘Evaluability assessment’, in Evaluation Research Methods: A Basic Guide, ed. Rutmna L., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California