Comments on Perrin's “Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement”

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 85-93

  Bernstein, David J ^a  

^a 11102 Flanagan Lane ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993811181     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409902000107     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Evaluation Association. (1998a). Annual conference call for proposals. Rockville, MD: American Evaluation Association.
2. American Evaluation Association. (1998b). AEA Mission Statement, AEA Homepage.
3. Ammons, D. (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local government: The case of libraries and leisure services. Public Administration Review, Vol. 55, No. 1. Washington DC: American Society for Public Administration.
4. Borenstein, D. (1998). The Land of Quotes homepage. http://www.quoteland.com/quotes/topic/74.html.
5. Endias, R. (1998). Posting to GOVTEVAL Listserve on research and evaluation. July 18, 1998.
6. Epstein, P. D. (1984). Using performance measurement in local government: A guide to improving decisions, performance, and accountability. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7. Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1994). Concepts statement no. 2: On concepts related to service efforts and accomplishments reporting. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
8. Hatry, H. (1996). Tracking the quality of services. Handbook of public administration, Second Edition. J. L. Perry (Ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
9. Holzer, M. & Halachmi, A. (1996). Measurement as a means of accountability. International Journal Of Public Administration, 19(11 & 12), 1921-1943. Marcel Dekker. New York, NY.
10. National Performance Review. (1997) Serving the American public: Best practices in performance measurement. Washington, DC.
11. Newcomer, K. (1997). Using performance measurement to improve programs. Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs. Kathryn E. Newcomer, (Ed.). New Directions for Evaluation, Number 75. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13. Perrin, B. (1998). Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 367-379.
14. Plantz, M. C. (1997). Lessons learned from united ways’ experiences in outcome measurement. Presented 1997 American Evaluation Association Annual Conference. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
15. Portland, Oregon. (1996), Service efforts and accomplishments, 1995-1996. Portland, OR: Audit Services Division.
16. Prince William County, Virginia. (1998). Service efforts and accomplishment report. Woodbridge, Virginia: Prince William County, Virginia.
17. United States General Accounting Office. (1994). Managing for results: State experiences provide insights for federal management reforms. GAOIGGD-95-22. Washington, DC.
18. United States General Accounting Office. (1997). Performance budgeting: Past initiatives offer insights for GPRA implementation. GAO/AJMD-97-46. Washington, DC.
19. Wholey, J. S. (1997). Trends in performance measurement: Challenges for evaluators. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.