Actionable knowledge: Intent versus actuality

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 441-444

  Argyris, Chris ^a  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748951994     PISSN: 00218863     EISSN: 15526879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021886396324008     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Argyris, C. (1980). Inner contradiction of rigorous research. London: Academic Press.
2. Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 390-406.
4. Connell, A., & Nord, W. R. (1996). The bloodless coup: The infiltration of organization science by uncertainty and values. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 407-427.
5. Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkery, T. (1996). Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 356-377.
6. Hogan, R., & Sinclair, R. (1996). Intellectual, ideological, and political obstacles to the advancement of organizational science. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 378-389.