Plant growth and architectural modelling and its applications

Annals of Botany

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 723-727

  Guo, Yan ^a   Fourcaud, Thierry ^b   Jaeger, Marc ^b   Zhang, Xiaopeng ^c   Li, Baoguo ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UMR AMAP   (France)

^c INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION   (China)

Author keywords

architecture; computational plants; FSPM; functionalstructural plant model; photosynthesis; Plant morphology; plasticity; root system; simulation; source and sink

Indexed keywords

GROWTH MODELING; GROWTH RATE; MORPHOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; PLANT COMMUNITY; ROOT SYSTEM; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT ROOT; REVIEW;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT ROOTS; PLANTS;

EID: 79954511369     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr073     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y. 2007. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany 99: 375-407. (Pubitemid 47364563)
2. Buck-Sorlin GH, Hemmerling R, Vos J, de Visser PHB. 2010. Modelling of spatial light distribution in the greenhouse: description of the model. In: Li BG, Jaeger M, Guo Y. eds. Plant growth modeling, simulation, visualization and applications - Proceedings of PMA09. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society 79-86.
3. Burie JB, Langlais M, Calonnec A. 2011. Switching from a mechanistic model to a continuous model to study at different scales the effect of vine growth on the dynamics of a powdery mildew epidemic. Annals of Botany 107: 885-895.
4. Cieslak M, Seleznyova AN, Hanan J. 2011. A functional-structural kiwifruit vine model integrating architecture, carbon dynamics and effects of the environment. Annals of Botany 107: 747-764.
5. Dornbusch T, Watt J, Baccar R, Fournier C, Andrieu B. 2011. A comparative analysis of leaf shape of wheat, barley and maize using an empirical shape model. Annals of Botany 107: 865-873.
6. 2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
7. Farquhar GD, Roderick ML. 2003. Pinatubo, diffuse light, and the carbon cycle. Science 299: 1997-1998. (Pubitemid 36383713)
8. Fourcaud T, Zhang XP. eds. 2008. Plant growth modeling and applications - Proceedings of PMA06. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Fourcaud T, Zhang XP, Stokes A, Lambers H, Korner C. 2008. Plant growth modeling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Annals of Botany 101: 1053-1063.
10. Godin C, Sinoquet H. 2005. Functional-structural plant modelling. New Phytologist 166: 705-708. (Pubitemid 40717672)
11. Han L, Gresshoff PM, Hanan J. 2011. A functional-structural modeling approach to autoregulation of nodulation. Annals of Botany 107: 855-863.
12. Hanan J, Prusinkiewicz P. 2008. Foreword. Studying plants with functional- structural models. Functional Plant Biology 35: i-iii.
13. Host GE, Stech HW, Lenz KE, Roskoski K, Mather R. 2008. Forest patch modeling: using high performance computing to simulate aboveground interactions among individual trees. Functional Plant Biology 35: 976-987.
14. Hu BG, Jaeger M. eds. 2003. Plant growth modeling and applications - Proceedings of PMA03. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press/Springer.
15. Jullien A, Mathieu A, Allirand JM, et al. 2011. Characterization of the interactions between architecture and source-sink relationships in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using the GreenLab model. Annals of Botany 107: 765-779.
16. Kang M, Yang L, Zhang B, de Reffye P. 2011. Correlation between dynamic tomato fruit-set and source-sink ratio: a common relationship for different plant densities and seasons? Annals of Botany 107: 805-815.
17. Le Roux X, Lacointe A, Escobar-Gutierrez A, Le Dizes S. 2001. Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: a critical appraisal. Annals of Forest Science 58: 469-506. (Pubitemid 32818114)
18. Li BG, Jaeger M, Guo Y. eds. 2010. Plant growth modeling, simulation, visualization and applications - Proceedings of PMA09. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Lynch JP. 2007. Roots of the second green revolution. Australian Journal of Botany 55: 493-512.
20. Ma Y, Wubs AM, Mathieu A, et al. 2011. Simulation of fruit-set and trophic competition and optimization of yield advantages in six Capsicum cultivars using functional-structural plant modelling. Annals of Botany 107: 793-803.
21. Murchie EH, Pinto M, Horton P. 2009. Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. New Phytologist 181: 532-552.
22. Pallas B, Christophe A, Lecoeur J. 2010. Are the common assimilate pool and trophic relationships appropriate for dealing with the observed plasticity of grapevine development? Annals of Botany 105: 233-247.
23. Pallas B, Loi C, Christophe A, Cournède PH, Lecoeur J. 2011. Comparison of three approaches to model grapevine organogenesis in conditions of fluctuating temperature, solar radiation and soil water content. Annals of Botany 107: 729-745.
24. Peng SB, Khush GS, Virk P, Tang QY, Zou YB. 2008. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research 108: 32-38.
25. Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Salminen H, Saarenmaa H, Väkevä J. 1996. LIGNUM: a tree model based on simple structural units. Annals of Botany 77: 87-98.
26. Postma JA, Lynch JP. 2011. Theoretical evidence for the functional benefit of root cortical aerenchyma in soils with low phosphorus availability. Annals of Botany 107: 829-841.
27. Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A. 1990. The algorithmic beauty of plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Qian Q, He P, Zheng XW, Chen Y, Zhu LH. 2011. Genetic analysis of morphological and related taxonomic traits in rice. In: Khush GV, Brar DS, Hary B. eds. Advances in rice genetics. Rice Genetics Collection, vol. 8. Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, 67-68.
29. de Reffye P, Edelin C, Francon J, Jaeger M, Puech C. 1988. Plant models faithful to botanical structure and development. Computer Graphics 22: 151-158.
30. Renton M. 2011. How much detail and accuracy is required in plant growth submodels to address questions about optimal management strategies in agricultural systems? AoB PLANTS 2011 plr006 doi:10.1093/aobpla/plr006.
31. Room P, Hanan J, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Virtual plants: new perspectives for ecologists, pathologists and agricultural scientists. Trends in Plant Science 1: 33-38. (Pubitemid 126663381)
32. Sarlikioti V, de Visser PHB, Marcelis LFM. 2011. Exploring the spatial distribution of light interception and photosynthesis of canopies by means of a functional-structural plant model. Annals of Botany 107: 875-883.
33. Vos J, Evers JB, Buck-Sorlin GH, Andrieu B, Chelle M, de Visser PHB. 2010. Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2101-2115.
34. Wang F, Kang M, Lu Q, et al. 2011. A stochastic model of tree architecture and biomass partitioning: application to Mongolian Scots pines. Annals of Botany 107: 781-792.
35. Wu H, Jaeger M, Wang M, Li B, Zhang BG. 2011. Three-dimensional distribution of vessels, passage cells and lateral roots along the root axis of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Annals of Botany 107: 843-853.
36. Xu L, Henke M, Zhu J, KurthW, Buck-Sorlin G. 2011. A functional- structural model of rice linking quantitative genetic information with morphological development and physiological processes. Annals of Botany 107: 817-828.
37. Yang XC, Hwa CM. 2008. Genetic modification of plant architecture and variety improvement in rice. Heredity 101: 396-404.
38. 4 photosynthesis models: an overview from the perspective of crop modeling. NJAS -Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 57: 27-38.
39. Zheng BY, Ma YT, Li BG, Guo Y, Deng QY. 2011. Assessment of the influence of global dimming on the photosynthetic production of rice based on three-dimensional modeling. Science China Earth Sciences 54: 290-297.