Sandblasted-acid-etched titanium surface influences in vitro the biological behavior of SaOS-2 human osteoblast-like cells

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 183-192

  Ramaglia, Luca ^a   Postiglione, Loredana ^a   di Spigna, Gaetano ^a   Capece, Gabriele ^a   Salvatore, Salzano ^b   Rossi, Guidos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cell differentiation; Dental implants; Extracellular matrix; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR; BONE CELL RESPONSE; BONE DIFFERENTIATION; BONE HEALING PROCESS; BONE TISSUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MORPHOLOGY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX COMPONENTS; HUMAN OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; IN-VITRO; OSSEOINTEGRATED DENTAL IMPLANTS; RECEPTOR EXPRESSION; SAOS-2 CELLS; SMOOTH SURFACE; TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; TITANIUM SURFACES;

BIOMATERIALS; BONE; CELL CULTURE; GROWTH KINETICS; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TITANIUM; TOPOGRAPHY;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALPHA2 INTEGRIN; ALPHA5 INTEGRIN; ALPHA6 INTEGRIN; BETA1 INTEGRIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; FIBRONECTIN; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; INTERLEUKIN 6; SCLEROPROTEIN; SULFURIC ACID; TENASCIN; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; WOUND HEALING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANTIGENS, CD29; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; COLLAGEN TYPE I; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL MATERIALS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; INTEGRIN ALPHA2; INTEGRIN ALPHA5; INTEGRIN ALPHA6; INTERLEUKIN-6; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; SULFURIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENASCIN; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 79954506633     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-107     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. In: Davies JE, editor. Quantifed bone tissue reactions to various metallic materials with reference to the socalled osteointegration concept. The bone-biomaterial interface. Toronto: University of Toronto press; 1991. p. 357-363.
2. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 536-543.
3. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 544-564.
4. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson H, Kasemo B, Larsson K, Lundstrom I, Mcqueen DH, Skalak R. The interface zone of inorganic implants in vivo: titanium implants in bone. Ann Biomed Eng 1983; 11: 1-27.
5. Cochran DL. Implant therapy I. Ann Periodontol 1996; 1: 707-791.
6. Cochran DL. Endosseous dental implant surfaces in human clinical trials. A comparison using meta-analysis. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 1523-1539.
7. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 163-174.
8. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblastlike cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 389-401.
9. Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 17-29.
10. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1567-1575.
11. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 889-902.
12. Thomas KA, Cook SD. An evaluation of variables infuencing implant fxation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 875-901.
13. Wieland M, Sittig C, Brunette DM, Textor M, Spencer ND. In: Davies JE, editor. Measurement and evaluation of the chemical composition and topography of titanium implant surfaces. Bone Engineering. Toronto: EM squared Inc; 2000. p. 163-182.
14. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Titanium surface roughness alter responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha, 25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 39: 77-85.
15. Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behaviour of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 231-246.
16. Brunette DM. In: Ratner BD, editor. The effect of surface topography on cell migration and adhesion. Surface characterization of Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1988. p. 203-217.
17. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Cochran DL, Simpson J, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 32: 55-63.
18. Postiglione L, Di Domenico G, Ramaglia L, Montagnani S, Salzano S, Di Meglio F, Sbordone L, Vitale M, Rossi G. Behavior of SaOS-2 cells cultured on different titanium surfaces. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 692-696.
19. Postiglione L, Di Domenico G, Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Di Meglio F, Montagnani S. Different titanium surfaces modulate the bone phenotype of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. Eur J Histochem 2004; 48: 213-222.
20. Wilke JH, Claes L, Steinemann S. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, editors. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. Clinical implant materials: Advances in Biomaterials, vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1990. p. 309-314.
21. Brunette DM. Fibroblasts on micromachined substrata orient hierarchically to grooves of different dimensions. Exp Cell Res 1986; 164: 11-26.
22. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Simpson J, Wieland M, Landolt D, Boyan B. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 1986; 26: 1837-1847.
23. Chen Q, Kinch MS, Lin TH, Burridge K, Juliano RL. Integrin-mediated cell adhesion activates mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 26602-26605.
24. Gronowicz G, McCarthy MB. Response of human osteoblasts to implant materials: integrin-mediated adhesion. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 878-887.
25. Gronowicz G, Krause A, McCarthy MB, Cowles EA. In: Davies JE, editor. Integrin mediated signalling of osteoblasts on implant materials. Bone Engineering. Toronto: EM squared Inc; 2000. p. 256-266.
26. Ingber DE, Dike L, Hansen L, Karp S, Liley H, Maniotis A, Mcnamee H, Mooney D, Plopper G, Sims J, Wang N. Cellular tensegrity: exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. Int Rev Cytol 1994; 150: 173-224.
27. Campbell CE, Von Recum AF. Microtopography and soft tissue response. J Invest Surg 1989; 2: 51-74.
28. Chou L, Firth J, Uitto V, Brunette D. Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fbronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fbroblasts. J Cell Sci 1995; 108: 1563-1573.
29. Lian JB, Stein GS. The developmental stages of osteoblast growth and differentiation exhibit selective responses of genes to growth factors (TGF beta 1) and hormones (vitamin D and glucocorticoids). J Oral Implantol 1993; 19: 95-105.
30. Mossetti G, Rendina D, De Filippo G, Viceconti R, di Domenico G, Cioff M, Postiglione L, Nunziata V. Interleukin-6 and osteoprotegerin systems in Paget's disease of bone: relationship to risedronate treatment. Bone 2005; 36: 549-554.
31. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, Barone LM, Wilming L, Tassinari MS, Kennedy MB, Pockwinse S, Lian JB, Stein GS. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990; 143: 420-430.
32. Hynes RO, Yamada KM. Fibronectins: multifunctional modular glycoproteins. J Cell Biol 1982; 95: 369-377.
33. Jones FS, Jones PL. The tenascin family of ECM glycoproteins: Structure, function, and regulation during embryonic development and tissue remodeling. Dev Dyn 2000; 218: 235-259.
34. Steffensen B, Duong AA, Milam SB, Potempa CL, Winborn WB, Magnuson VL, Chen D, Zardeneta G, Klebe RJ. Immunohistological localization of cell adhesion proteins and integrins in the periodontium. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 584-592.
35. Schneider G, Burridge K. Formation of focal adhesion by osteoblast adhering to different substrata. Exp Cell Res 1994; 214: 264-269.
36. Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like mg63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 683-692.
37. El-Ghannam A, Ducheyne P, Shapiro IM. Formation of surface reaction products on bioactive glass and their effects on the expression of the osteoblastic phenotype and the deposition of mineralized extracellularmatrix. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 295-303.
38. Farley JR, Hall SL, Herring S, Tarbaux NM, Matsuyama T, Wergedal JE. Skeletal alkaline phosphatase specifc activity is an index of the osteoblastic phenotype in subpopulations of the human osteosarcoma cell line SaOS-2. Metabolism 1991; 40: 664-671.
39. Murray E, Provvedini D, Curran D, Catherwood B, Sussman H, Manolagas S. Characterization of a human osteoblastic osteosarcoma cell line (SaOS-2) with high bone alkaline phosphatase activity. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2: 231-238.
40. Postiglione L, Di Domenico G, Montagnani S, di Spigna G, Salzano S, Castaldo C, Ramaglia L, Sbordone L, Rossi G. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) induces the osteoblastic differentiation of the human osteosarcoma cell line SaOS-2. Calcif Tissue Int 2003; 72: 85-97.
41. Rodan SB, Imai Y, Thiede MA, Wesolowski G, Thompson D, Bar-Shavit Z, Shull S, Mann K, Rodan GA. Characterization of a human osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) with osteoblastic properties. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 4961-4966.
42. Scheven BA, Marshall D, Aspden RM. In vitro behaviour of human osteoblasts on dentin and bone. Cell Biology International 2002; 26: 337-346.
43. Shapira L, Halabi A. Behavior of two osteoblast-like cell lines cultured on machined or rough titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 50-55.
44. Sinha RK, Morris F, Shah SA, Tuan RS. Surface composition of orthopaedic implant metals regulates cell attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization of primary human osteoblasts in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 305: 258-272.
45. Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Whitson SW, Ambrose WW, Uoshima K, Cooper LF. Correlative microscopic investigation of the interface between titanium alloy and the osteoblast- osteoblast matrix using mineralizing cultures of primary fetal bovinemandibular osteoblasts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 655-665.
46. Zhang H, Ahmad M, Gronowicz G. Effects of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (tgfbeta1) on in vitro mineralization of human osteoblasts on implant materials. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2013-2020.
47. Ramaglia L, di Domenico G, Postiglione L, Montagnani S, Rossi G, Sbordone L. Proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells on titanium surfaces. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 213.
48. Aronow MA, Gerstenfeld LC, Owen TA, Tassinari MS, Stein GS, Lian JB. Factors that promote progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype in cultured fetal rat calvaria cells. J Cell Physiol 1990; 143: 213-221.
49. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 391-401.
50. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 932-949.
51. Nomura S, Wills AJ, Edwards DR, Heath JK, Hogan BL. Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization. J Cell Biol 1988; 106: 441-450.
52. Osborn JF, Newesley H. In: Heimke G, editor. Dynamics aspects of the implant-bone interface. Dental implants materials and systems. Munich: Carl Hanser; 1980. p. 111-123.
53. Pockwinse SM, Wilming LG, Conlon DM, Stein GS, Lian JB. Expression of cell growth and bone specifc genes at single cell resolution during development of bone tissue-like organization in primary osteoblast cultures. J Cell Biochem 1992; 49: 310-323.
54. Sandberg M, Autio-Harmainen H, Vuorio E. Localization of the expression of types I, III, and IV collagen, TGFbeta 1 and c-fos genes in developing human calvarial bones. Dev Biol 1988; 130: 324-334.
55. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefnger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behaviour of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 38-48.
56. Stanford CM, Keller JC. The concept of osseointegration and bone matrix expression. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1991; 2: 83-101.
57. Weinreb M, Shinar D, Rodan GA. Different pattern of alkaline phosphatase, osteopontin, and osteocalcin expression in developing rat bone visualized by in situ hybridization. J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5: 831-842.
58. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 522-534.
59. Degasne I, Baslé MF, Demais V, Huré G, Lesourd M, Grolleau B, Mercier L, Chappard D. Effects of roughness, fbronectin and vitronectin on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (SaOS-2) on titanium surfaces. Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 64: 499-507.
60. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 530-539.