Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2181-2190

  Casserly, Elizabeth D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FEEDBACK; ACOUSTIC SIGNALS; FEEDBACK PERTURBATION; FORMANT FREQUENCY; FUTURE DIRECTIONS; HIGH FREQUENCY HF; LOCAL PERTURBATION; MONITOR AND CONTROL; OFFLINE; SPECTRAL CENTER; SPEECH ACOUSTICS;

CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION; LINGUISTICS; PRODUCTION;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79954491294     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3552883     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baum, S. R., and McFarland, D. H. (1997). The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2353-2359. (Pubitemid 27441388)
2. Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2008). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer., Version 5.0.40 Computer program, Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam.
3. Burnett, T. A., Senner, J., and Larson, C. R. (1997). Voice responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: A preliminary study., J. Voice 11, 202-211.
4. 0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3153-3161. (Pubitemid 28274936)
5. 0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1157-1163. (Pubitemid 46192714)
6. 0 contours in syllables., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 357-366. (Pubitemid 34093330)
7. Elman, J. L. (1981). Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70, 45-50. (Pubitemid 11016774)
8. Fowler, C. A., and Turvey, M. T. (1980). Immediate compensation in bite-block speech., Phonetica 37, 306-326.
9. Harris, K. S. (1958). Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables., Lang. Speech 1, 1-7.
10. Houde, J. F., and Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production., Science 279, 1213-1216. (Pubitemid 28164374)
11. Houde, J. F., and Jordan, M. I. (2002). Sensoriomotor adaptation of speech I: compensation and adaptation., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45, 295-310.
12. Howell, P., El-Yaniv, N., and Powell, D. J. (1987). Factors affecting fluency in stutterers when speaking under altered auditory feedback., in Speech Motor Dynamics in Stuttering, edited by, H. Peters, and, W. Hulstijn, (Springer Press, New York), pp. 361-369.
13. Hughes, G. W., and Halle, M. (1956). Spectral properties of fricative consonants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 303-310.
14. Jones, J. A., and Munhall, K. G. (2000). Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1246-1251.
15. Jones, J. A., and Munhall, K. G. (2002). The role of auditory feedback during phonation: Studies of Mandarin tone production., J. Phonetics 30, 303-320.
16. Jongman, A., Wayland, R., and Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1252-1263.
17. Kalinowski, H., Armson, J., Roland-Mieszkowski, M., and Stuart, A. (1993). Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency., Lang. Speech 36, 1-16.
18. Kelso, J. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., and Fowler, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures., J. Exp. Psychol. Hum Percept. Perform. 10, 812-832.
19. Ladefoged, P. (2005). A Course in Phonetics, 5th ed. (Thomson/Wadsworth, Boston, MA), pp. 191-197.
20. Mann, V. A., and Repp, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the sh-s distinction., Percept. Psychophys. 28, 213-228.
21. Munhall, K. G., MacDonald, E. N., Byrne, S. K., and Johnsrude, I. (2009). Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 384-390.
22. Nittrouer, S., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1987). The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults., J. Speech Hear. Res. 30, 319-329. (Pubitemid 18020105)
23. Purcell, D. W., and Munhall, K. G. (2006a). Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2288-2297.
24. Purcell, D. W., and Munhall, K. G. (2006b). Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 966-977. (Pubitemid 44213708)
25. Shiller, D. M., Sato, M., Gracco, V. L., and Baum, S. R. (2009). Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1103-1113.
26. Sivasankar, M., Bauer, J. J., Babu, T., and Larson, C. R. (2005). Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 850-857. (Pubitemid 40223445)
27. Villacorta, V. M. (2005). Speech sensorimotor adaptation to acoustic perturbations in the first formant of vowels and its relation to perception., Unpublished doctoral thesis. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
28. Villacorta, V. M., Perkell, J., and Guenther, F. H. (2007). Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2306-2319. (Pubitemid 47493357)
29. Whalen, D. H. (1981). Effects of vocalic formant transitions from vowel quality on the English s- S Smile boundary., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 275-282.
30. Xu, Y., Larson, C. R., Bauer, J. J., and Hain, T. C. (2004). Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1168-1178. (Pubitemid 39063205)