Judgement and supply chain dynamics

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1138-1158

  Syntetos, A A ^a   Georgantzas, N C ^b   Boylan, J E ^c   Dangerfield, B C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BUCKINGHAMSHIRE NEW UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bullwhip; human judgement; inventory forecasting; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

SUPPLY CHAINS; SYSTEM THEORY;

BULLWHIP; EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING; FORECASTING DEMAND; HUMAN JUDGEMENT; LABORATORY STUDIES; SUPPLY CHAIN DYNAMICS; SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

FORECASTING;

EID: 79954490884     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2010.56     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akkermans H and Dellaert N (2005). The rediscovery of industrial dynamics: The contribution of system dynamics to supply chain management in a dynamic and fragmented world. Syst Dynam Rev 21:173-186. (Pubitemid 41724255)
2. Barlas Y and Ozevin MG (2004). Analysis of stock management gaming experiments and alternative ordering formulations. Syst Res Behav Sci 21:439-470. (Pubitemid 39543275)
3. Blattberg RC and Hoch SJ (1990). Database models and managerial intutition: 50% model + 50% manager. Mngt Sci 36:887-899.
4. Cachon GP and Lariviere M (1999). Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn. Mngt Sci 45:685-703.
5. Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan JK and Simchi-Levi D (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Mngt Sci 46:436-443. (Pubitemid 30596821)
6. Chen F, Ryan JK and Simchi-Levi D (2000). The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect. Nav Res Logist 47:269-286.
7. Cheung KL and Zhang AX (1999). The impact of inventory information distortion due to customer order cancellations. Nav Res Logist 46:213-231.
8. Clark TE and McCracken MW (2001). Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models. J Econom 105:85-110. (Pubitemid 33645287)
9. Clark TE and McCracken MW (2005). Evaluating direct multi-step forecasts. Econom Rev 24:369-404.
10. Croson R and Donohue K (2005). Upstream versus downstream information and its impact on the bullwhip effect. Syst Dynam Rev 21:249-260. (Pubitemid 41724258)
11. Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM and Bingham C (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad Mngt Rev 32:480-499.
12. Eroglu C (2006). An investigation of accuracy, learning and biases in judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, USA.
13. Eroglu C and Croxton KL (2010). Biases in judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts: The role of individual differences. Int J Forecast 26:116-133.
14. Fildes R, Goodwin P, Lawrence M and Nikolopoulos K (2009). Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning. Int J Forecast 25:3-23.
15. Forrester JW (1958). Industrial dynamics-a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus Rev 36:37-66.
16. Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA; currently available from Pegasus Communications: Waltham, MA.
17. Franses PH (2007). Does experts' adjustment to model-based forecasts contribute to forecast quality? Econometric Institute Report 2007-37, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
18. Franses PH and Legerstee R (2009). Properties of expert adjustments on model-based SKU-level forecasts. Int J Forecast 25:35-47.
19. Gavirneni S (2006). Price fluctuations, information sharing and supply chain performance. Eur J Opl Res 174:1651-1663. (Pubitemid 44176281)
20. Georgantzas NC (2001). Simulation modelling. In: Warner M (ed). International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, 2nd edn. Thomson Learning: London: UK, pp 5861-5872.
21. Georgantzas NC (2003). Tourism dynamics: Cyprus' hotel value chain and profitability. Syst Dynam Rev 19:175-212. (Pubitemid 37293496)
22. Georgantzas NC (2009). Scenario-driven planning with system dynamics, In: Meyers B (ed). Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science. Springer, NY, Entry # 573, p 23.
23. Kleijnen JPC and Smits MT (2003). Performance metrics in supply chain management. J Opl Res Soc 54:507-514.
24. Kolassa S, Shütz W, Boylan JE, and Syntetos AA (2008). Judgemental changes to forecasts: Higher inventories, unchanged out-of-stocks. 28th International Symposium on Forecasting, Nice, France.
25. Lane DC and Schwaninger M (2008). Theory building with system dynamics: Topic and research contributions. Syst Res Behav Sci 25(4):439-445.
26. Lee HL, Padmanabhan V and Whang S (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The Bullwhip effect. Mngt Sci 43:546-558. (Pubitemid 127569855)
27. Lee HL, Padmanabhan V and Whang S (1997). The Bullwhip Effect in supply chains. Sloan Mngt Rev 38:93-102.
28. Lee HL, So KC and Tang CS (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Mngt Sci 46:626-643.
29. Otto A and Kotzab H (2003). Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain. Eur J Opl Res 144:306-320. (Pubitemid 35214205)
30. Paik S-K and Bagchi PK (2007). Understanding the causes of the bullwhip effect in a supply chain. Int J Retail Distrib Mngt 35:308-324.
31. Potter A and Disney SM (2006). Bullwhip and batching: An exploration. Int J Prod Econ 104:408-418. (Pubitemid 44403066)
32. Pujawan IN (2004). The effect of lot sizing rules on order variability. Eur J Opl Res 159:617-635.
33. Reiner G and Fichtinger J (2009). Demand forecasting for supply processes in consideration of pricing and market information. Int J Prod Econ 118:55-62.
34. ™: Lebanon NH.
35. Saeed K (2009). Can trend forecasting improve stability in supply chains? A response to Forrester's challenge in Appendix L of Industrial Dynamics. Syst Dynam Rev 25:63-78.
36. Sterman JD (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dynam Rev 10:291-330.
37. Sterman JD (2000). System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World. Irwin McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA.
38. Syntetos AA and Boylan JE (2008). Demand forecasting adjustments for service-level achievement. IMA J Mngt Math 19:175-192.
39. Syntetos AA, Boylan JE and Disney SM (2009). Forecasting for inventory planning: A 50-year review. J Opl Res Soc 60 (S1): 149-160.
40. Syntetos AA, Nikolopoulos K, Boylan JE, Fildes R and Goodwin P (2009). The effects of integrating management judgement into intermittent demand forecasts. Int J Prod Econ 118:72-81.
41. Syntetos AA, Nikolopoulos K and Boylan JE (2010). Judging the judges through accuracy-implication metrics: The case of inventory forecasting. Int J Forecast 26:134-143.
42. Wong CY, El-Beheiry MM, Johansen J and Hvolby HH (2007). The implications of information sharing on bullwhip effects in a toy supply chain. Int J Risk Assess Mngt 7:4-18. (Pubitemid 44846526)
43. Yasarcan H and Barlas Y (2005). A generalized stock control formulation for stock management problems involving composite delays and secondary stocks. Syst Dynam Rev 21:33-68. (Pubitemid 40652266)
44. Zhang X (2004). Evolution of ARMA demand in supply chains. Manuf Serv Opns Mngt 6:195-198. (Pubitemid 41342343)