Divergence between respirometry and physicochemical methods in the fractionation of the chemical oxygen demand in municipal wastewater

Water Environment Research

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 162-172

  Fall, C ^a   Flores, N A ^a   Espinoza, M A ^a   Vazquez, G ^a   Loaiza Navia J ^b   Van Loosdrecht, M C M ^c   Hooijmans, C M ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b Servicio de Agua y Drenaje de Monterrey   (Mexico)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ASM1; Calibration; Characterization; Chemical oxygen demand fractionation; Colloids; Filtration; Modeling; Readily biodegradable; Respirometry

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CHARACTERIZATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COLLOIDS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FILTRATION; MODELS; OXYGEN;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE MODEL; ASM1; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERS; PHYSICO-CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL METHODS; READILY BIODEGRADABLE; RESPIROMETRIC TESTS; RESPIROMETRY;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOASSAY; BIODEGRADATION; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COLLOID; FILTER; FILTRATION; FRACTIONATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RESPIRATION; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FRACTIONATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIROMETRY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79954490795     PISSN: 10614303     EISSN: 15547531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2175/106143010X12780288627931     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation (1989) Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, D.C.
2. Anderson, E.; Ginestet, P.; Spérandio, M.; Paul, E. (2001) Influence of Pre-Treatments and Recycled Flows on the COD Fractions of a Wastewater: A Case Study. Water Sci. Technol., 43 (11), 99-108.
3. Choubert, J. M.; Stricker, A. E.; Marquot, A.; Racault, Y.; Gillot, S.; Hehuit, A. (2009) Updated Activated Sludge Model No. 1. Parameter Values for Improving Prediction of Nitrogen Removal in AS Processes: Validation at 13 Full-Scale Plants. Water Environ. Res., 81, 858-865.
4. CONAGUA (2008) Statistics of Water in Mexico, 2008 (Estadisticas del Agua en México, 2008). Comisión Nacional del Agua, Edt SEMARNAT, México D.F., México (in Spanish).
5. Cox, C. D. (2004) Statistical Distributions of Uncertainty and Variability in Activated Sludge Model Parameters. Water Environ. Res., 76, 2672-2685.
6. Envirosim (2006) BioWin User Manual, Envirosim Ltd.: Flamborough, Ontario, Canada.
7. Fall, C.; Cuenca, F. M.; Bâ, K. M.; Solís, C. M. (2006) Respirometry-Based Evaluation of the Fate and Possible Effects of Antifreeze on Activated Sludge. J. Environ. Manage., 80 (1), 83-89.
8. Fall, C.; Loaiza-Navia, J.; Esparza-Soto, M. (2009) Full Activated Sludge Model No. 1 Calibration Experience at a Medium-Size WWTP in Mexico. Water Sci. Technol., 60, 3069-3082.
9. Gokcay, C. F.; Sin, G. (2004) Modelling of a Large-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant for Efficient Operation. Water Sci. Technol., 50, 123-130.
10. Henze, M.; Gujer, W.; Mino, T.; Van Loosdrecht, M. V. (2002) Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3; IWA Publishing: London, United Kingdom.
11. Hydromantis Inc. (2006) User's Guide; Hydromantis Inc.: Hamilton, Ontario, , Canada.
12. INEGI (2008) Environmental Statistics of the Metropolitan Area of Monterrey (Estadísticas del medio ambiente de la zona metropolitana de Monterrey). National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics (INEGI), México (in Spanish).
13. INEGI (2006) Manifacturing Industries, 2004 Economic Census (Industrias Manufactureras, Censos Economicos de 2004). National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics (INEGI), México (in Spanish).
14. Karahan, O.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Orhon, D. (2006) Modeling the Utilization of Starch by Activated Sludge for Simultaneous Substrate Storage and Microbial Growth. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 94 (1), 43-53.
15. Lagarde, F.; Tusseau, M. H. V.; Lessard, P.; Heduit, A.; Dutrop, F.; Mouchel, J. M. (2005) Variability of Urban Wastewater Biodegradable Fraction by Respirometry. Water Res., 39, 4768-4778.
16. Lissant, K. J. (1983) Demulsification of Oil in Water Emulsions. In Demulsification: Industrial Applications; Marcel Dekker: New York.
17. Loaiza, J. N. (2007) Modeling of the Activated Sludge Process at the Wastewater Treatment Plant of the Metropolitan Area of Monterrey (Modelación del proceso de lodos activados de la PTAR Noreste del área metropolitana de Monterrey). Ph.D. Dissertation, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, Toluca, Mexico (in Spanish).
18. Mamais, D.; Jenkins, D.; Pitt, P. (1993) A Rapid Physical-Chemical Method for the Determination of Readily Biodegradable Soluble COD in Municipal Wastewater. Water Res., 14, 1215-1224.
19. Metcalf & Eddy (2003) Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Reuse; McGraw-Hill: New York.
20. Nazzal, F. F.; Wiesner, M. R. (1996) Microfiltration of Oil-In-Water Emulsions. Water Environ. Res., 68, 1187-1191.
21. Petersen, B.; Gernaey, K.; Henze, M.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2002) Evaluation of an ASM1 Model Calibration Procedure on a Municipal-Industrial WWTP. J. Hydroinform., 4, 15-38.
22. Roeleveld, P. J.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2002) Experience with Guidelines for Wastewater Characterization in the Netherlands. Water Sci. Technol., 45 (6), 77-87.
23. Rubí, H.; Fall, C.; Ortega, R. E. (2009) Pollutants Removal of Oily Wastewater Discharged from Car Washes through Sedimentation-Coagulation. Water Sci. Technol., 59, 2359-2369.
24. Spérandio, M.; Etienne, P. (2000) Estimation of Wastewater Biodegradable COD Fractions by Combining Respirometric Experiments in Various So/Xo Ratios. Water Resour. Res., 34, 1233-1246.
25. Spérandio, M.; Urbain, V.; Ginestet, P.; Audic, M. J.; Etienne, P. (2001) Application of COD Fractionation by a New Combined Technique: Comparison of Various Wastewaters and Sources of Variability. Water Sci. Technol., 43 (1), 181-190.
26. Sin, G.; Van Hulle, S. W. H.; De Pauw, D. G. W.; van Griensven, A.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2005) A Critical Comparison of Systematic Calibration Protocols for Activated Sludge Models: A SWOT Analysis. Water Res., 39, 2459-2474.
27. Takáks, I.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2006) Elemental Balances in Activated Sludge Modelling. Proceedings of IWA World Water Congress 2006, Beijing, China, Sept. 10-14; International Water Association: London, United Kingdom.
28. Vanrolleghem, P.; Spangers, H.; Petersen, B.; Ginestet, P.; Takáks, I. (1999) Estimating (Combination of) Activated Sludge Model No. 1 Parameters and Components by Respirometry. Water Sci. Technol., 39 (1), 195-214.
29. Vazquez, G. M. (2007) ASM1 COD - Fractions in the Municipal Wastewater of Toluca, México (Fracciones de DQO del modelo ASM1 en aguas residuales municipales de la ciudad de Toluca). M.Sc. Thesis. Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, Toluca, Mexico (in Spanish).
30. Water Environment Research Foundation (2003) Methods for Wastewater Characterization in Activated Sludge Modeling, 1st ed., WERF publication no. 9 WWF3; Water Environment Research Federation: Alexandria, Virginia.