Pure laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: Evaluation of health survey and graft functions

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 791-794

  Genc, V ^a   Ozgencil, E ^a   Orozakunov, E ^a   Can, O S ^a   Yilmaz, A A ^a   Ozsay, O ^a   Cipe, G ^a   Oztuna, D ^a   Cakmak, A ^a   Tuzuner, A ^a   Hazinedaroglu, S M ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERY THROMBOSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GRAFT FAILURE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY GRAFT; LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36;

ADULT; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79954484910     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.099     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. S.L. Brown, T.R. Biehl, and M.C. Rawlins Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach J Urol 165 2001 766
2. L.E. Ratner, L.J. Ciseck, and R.G. Moore Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy Transplantation 60 1995 1047
3. J.E. Ware http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf36.shtml Access November 11, 2010
4. N.F. Kok, M.Y. Lind, and B.M. Hansson Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial BMJ 333 2006 221
5. L.S. Percegona, A.T. Bignelli, and A. Adamy Jr Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparison to pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy Transplant Proc 40 2008 687
6. A.E. Handschin, M. Weber, and N. Demartines Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy Br J Surg 90 2003 1323
7. A. Srivastava, N. Gupta, and A. Kumar Evolution of the technique of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy at a single center: experience with more than 350 cases Urol Int 81 2008 431
8. D. Canes, J.A. Mandeville, and R.J. Taylor Pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: 3-year experience and analysis of a refined technique to maximize graft function J Endourol 22 2008 2275
9. E.Y. Ko, E.P. Castle, and P.J. Desai Utility of the endovascular stapler for right-sided laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a 7-year experience at Mayo Clinic J Am Coll Surg 207 2008 896
10. S. Mishra, A. Ganpule, and V. Muthu Evaluating graft function in pediatric recipients for living donor renal transplantation: is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy safe? Indian J Urol 25 2009 195
11. C.J. Hung, Y.J. Lin, and S.S. Chang Development of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a strategy to increase living kidney donation incentive and maintain equivalent donor/recipient outcome J Formos Med Assoc 108 2009 135
12. S.C. Jacobs, E. Cho, and C. Foster Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6 year experience J Urol 171 2004 47
13. N. Simforoosh, A. Basiri, and N. Shakhsalim Effect of warm ischemia on graft outcome in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy J Endourol 20 2006 895
14. T.M. Sasaki, F. Finelli, and E. Bugarin Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard? Arch Surg 135 2000 943
15. K.T. Perry, S.J. Freedland, and J.C. Hu Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy J Urol 169 2003 2018
16. J.F. Buell, L. Lee, and J.E. Martin Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study Clin Transplant 19 2005 102