Reenergising professional creativity from a CHAT perspective: Seeing knowledge and history in practice

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 181-193

  Ellis, Viv ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954435355     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2010.493595     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-329). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centred classroom. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
3. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
4. Ellis, V. (2008). Exploring the contradictions in learning to teach: The potential of Developmental Work Research. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 16(1), 53-63.
5. Ellis, V. (2010). Impoverishing experience: The problem of teacher education in England. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 105-120.
6. Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental work research as a test bench of activity theory: The case of the primary medical care practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64-103). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Engeström, Y. (2007a). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys towards coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14, 23-39.
8. Engeström, Y. (2007b). Putting activity theory to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363-382). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and New Public Management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247-266.
10. Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London, England: Verso.
11. McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P., & Ferlie, W. (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects. London, England: Routledge.
12. Miettinen, R. (2006). The sources of novelty: A cultural and systemic view of distributed creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 173-181.
13. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
14. Scribner, S. (1985a). Knowledge at work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 199-206.
15. Scribner, S. (1985b). Vygotsky's uses of history. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture and communication: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119-145). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Somekh, B., & Saunders, L. (2007). Developing knowledge through intervention: Meaning and definition of "quality" in research into change. Research Papers in Education, 22, 183-197.
17. Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17, 5-21.
18. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). Vygotskian collaborative project of social transformation. History, politics, and practice in knowledge construction. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 12(4), 58-80.
19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). Imagination and the creativity of the adolescent (T. Prout & R. van der Veer, Trans.). In R. Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 266-288). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
20. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97.
21. Whitehead, J. (1988). Foreword. In J. McNiff (Ed.), Action research: Principles and practice (pp. ix-xii). London, England: Macmillan.