A web-based generation and delivery system for active code reading

SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 483-488

  Hoffman, Daniel ^a   Lu, Ming ^a   Pelton, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Active learning; Code reading; CS1; Web based tool

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING; CODE QUALITY; CODE READING; COMPUTER SCIENCE COURSE; CS1; DELIVERY SYSTEMS; WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS; WEB-BASED TOOLS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79954431738     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1953163.1953301     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. The official web2py book, 2010. http://www.web2py.com/book.
2. Problets: the home page, 2010. http://www.problets.org.
3. P. Anderson, T. Reps, and T. Teitelbaum. Design and implementation of a fine-grained software inspection tool. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng., 29(8):721-733, Aug. 2003.
4. P. Carey. New Perspectives on HTML, XHTML, and Dynamic HTML. Cengage Learning, 4th edition, 2010.
5. P. Denny, B. Hanks, and B. Simon. Peerwise: replication study of a student-collaborative self-testing web service in a U.S. setting. In SIGCSE '10: Proc. of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer Science education, pages 421-425, 2010.
6. M. Eagle and T. Barnes. Experimental evaluation of an educational game for improved learning in introductory computing. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1):321-325, 2009.
7. D. Hoffman and M. Lu. A web tool for active code reading. In Proc. FECS 2010, 2010.
8. E. Jaffe. Will that be on the test? Assoc. Psych. Science, 21(10):18-21, 2008.
9. A. N. Kumar. Data space animation for learning the semantics of C++ pointers. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1):499-503, 2009.
10. Z. Liu. Is paper-based work sheet out of date for CSII? In Proc. FECS 2009, 2009.
11. J. McConnell. Active learning and its use in Computer Science. In Proc. SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conf. on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, 1996.
12. J. Osborne and E. Waters. Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8(2), 2002.
13. R. P. Pargas and S. Bryfczynski. Using ink to expose students' thought processes in CS2/CS7. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1):168-172, 2009.
14. D. Parnas and D. Weiss. Active design reviews. In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering, 1985.
15. B. Simon, M. Kohanfars, L. Michael, J. Lee, K. Tamayo, and Q. Cutts. Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing. In SIGCSE '10: Proc. of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 341-345. ACM, 2010.
16. J. Whittington. Increasing student retention and satisfaction in IT introductory programming courses using active learning. In Proc. 2006 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conf., 2006.