Foraging space as a limited resource: Inter- and intra-specific competition among sympatric pursuit-diving seabirds

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 356-368

  Ronconi, R A ^a,b   Burger, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ASSESSMENT METHOD; AVOIDANCE REACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDATOR; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SEABIRD; SHORELINE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYMPATRY;

AVES; BRACHYRAMPHUS; BRACHYRAMPHUS MARMORATUS; URIA AALGE;

EID: 79953897130     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: 14803283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/z11-006     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Armstrong, R.A., and McGehee, R. 1980. Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat. 115(2): 151-170. doi:10.1086/283553.
2. Ballance, L.T., Pitman, R.L., and Reilly, S.B. 1997. Seabird community structure along a productivity gradient: Importance of competition and energetic constraint. Ecology, 78(5): 1502-1518. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1502:SCSAAP]2.0.CO;2.
3. Barta, Z., and Giraldeau, L.A. 2001. Breeding colonies as information centers: a reappraisal of information-based hypotheses using the producer-scrounger game. Behav. Ecol. 12(2): 121-127. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.2.121.
4. Benjamini, Y. 1988. Opening the box of a boxplot. Am. Stat. 42(4): 257-262. doi:10.2307/2685133.
5. Beyer, H.L. 2004. Hawth's analysis tools for ArcGIS. Available from http://www.spatialecology.com/htools/ [accessed 15 January 2006].
6. Birt, V.L., Birt, T.P., Goulet, D., Cairns, D.K., and Montevecchi, W. A. 1987. Ashmole's halo: direct evidence for prey depletion by a seabird. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 40(3): 205-208. doi:10.3354/meps040205.
7. Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L., and Thomas, L. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Burger, A.E. 1991. Maximum diving depths and underwater foraging in alcids and penguins. Can. Wildl. Serv. Occas. Pap. No. 68. pp. 9-15.
9. Burger, A.E. 1997. Arrival and departure behavior of Common Murres at colonies: evidence for an information halo? Colon. Waterbirds, 20(1): 55-65. doi:10.2307/1521764.
10. Burger, A.E., Hitchcock, C.L., Stewart, E.A., and Davoren, G.K. 2008. Coexistence and spatial distributions of Marbled Murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) and other alcids off southwest Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Auk, 125(1): 192-204. doi:10.1525/auk.2008.125.1.192.
11. Burkett, E. 1995. Marbled murrelet food habits and prey ecology. In Ecology and conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. Edited by C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt, M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, Calif. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-152. pp. 223-246.
12. Camphuysen, K., and Webb, A. 1999. Multi-species feeding associations in North Sea seabirds: jointly exploiting a patchy environment. Ardea, 87(2): 177-198.
13. Carter, H.R. 1984. At-sea biology of the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. M.Sc. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
14. Chilton, G., and Sealy, S.G. 1987. Species roles in mixed-species feeding flocks of seabirds. J. Field Ornithol. 58(4): 456-463.
15. Cody, M.L. 1974. Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
16. Davoren, G.K. 2000. Variability in foraging in response to changing prey distributions in rhinoceros auklets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 198: 283-291. doi:10.3354/meps198283.
17. Davoren, G.K., and Montevecchi, W.A. 2003. Consequences of foraging trip duration on provisioning behaviour and fledging condition of common murres Uria aalge. J. Avian Biol. 34(1): 44-53. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2003.03008.x.
18. Davoren, G.K., Montevecchi, W.A., and Anderson, J.T. 2003a. Distributional patterns of a marine bird and its prey: habitat selection based on prey and conspecific behaviour. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 256: 229-242. doi:10.3354/meps256229.
19. Davoren, G.K., Montevecchi, W.A., and Anderson, J.T. 2003b. Search strategies of a pursuit-diving marine bird and the persistence of prey patches. Ecol. Monogr. 73(3): 463-481. doi:10.1890/02-0208.
20. Day, R.H., and Nigro, D.A. 2000. Feeding ecology of Kittlitz's and Marbled murrelets in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Waterbirds, 23(1): 1-14.
21. Day, R.H., Prichard, A.K., and Nigro, D.A. 2003. Ecological specialization and overlap of Brachyramphus murrelets in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Auk, 120(3): 680-699. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0680:ESAOOB]2.0.CO;2.
22. Denardo, C., Dougherty, M., Hastie, G., Leaper, R., Wilson, B., and Thompson, P.M. 2001. A new technique to measure spatial relationships within groups of free-ranging coastal cetaceans. J. Appl. Ecol. 38(4): 888-895. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00639.x.
23. Dill, L.M., Heithaus, M.R., and Walters, C.J. 2003. Behaviorally mediated indirect interactions in marine communities and their conservation implications. Ecology, 84(5): 1151-1157. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1151:BMIIIM]2.0.CO;2.
24. DuBowy, P.J. 1988. Waterfowl communities and seasonal environments: temporal variability in interspecific competition. Ecology, 69(5): 1439-1453. doi:10.2307/1941641.
25. Falk, K., Dall'Antonia, L., and Benvenutti, S. 2001. Mapping pre- and post-fledging foraging locations of thick-billed murres in the North Water polynya. Ecography, 24(6): 625-632. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240601.x.
26. Fortin, M.-J., and Jacquez, G.M. 2000. Randomization tests and spatially autocorrelated data. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 81(3): 201-205.
27. Garthe, S., Freyer, T., Huppop, O., and Wolke, D. 1999. Breeding Lesser Black-Backed Gulls Larus graellsii and Herring Gulls Larus argentatus: coexistence or competition? Ardea, 87(2): 227-236.
28. Gaston, A.J., and Jones, I.L. 1998. The Auks: Alcidae. Bird families of the World. Vol. 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Gotelli, N.J. 2001. A primer of ecology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
30. Grünbaum, D., and Veit, R.R. 2003. Black-browed albatrosses foraging on Antarctic krill: density-dependence through local enhancement? Ecology, 84(12): 3265-3275. doi:10.1890/01-4098.
31. Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L.L., Wallace, A., and Walsh, J.S. 1992. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am. Nat. 140(4): 539-572. doi:10.1086/285428.
32. Haney, J.C., and Schauer, A.E.S. 1994. Environmental variability facilitates coexistence within an alcid community at sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 103(3): 221-237.
33. Haney, J.C., Fristrup, K.M., and Lee, D.S. 1992. Geometry of visual recruitment by seabirds to ephemeral foraging flocks. Ornis Scand. 23(1): 49-62. doi:10.2307/3676427.
34. Hardin, G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science (Washington, D.C.), 131(3409): 1292-1297. doi:10.1126/science. 131.3409.1292. PMID:14399717.
35. Harrison, N.M., Whitehouse, M.J., Heinemann, D., Prince, P.A., Hunt, G.L., and Veit, R.R. 1991. Observations of multispecies seabird flocks around South Georgia. Auk, 108(4): 801-810.
36. Hay, D.E., Healey, M.C., Ware, D.M., and Wilimovsky, N.J. 1992. Distribution, abundance, and habitat of prey fish on the west coast of Vancouver Island. In The ecology, status, and conservation of marine and shoreline birds of the west coast of Vancouver Island. Edited by K. Vermeer, R.W. Butler, and K.H. Morgan. Can. Wildl. Serv. Occas. Pap. No. 75. pp. 22-29
37. Heithaus, M.R., and Dill, L.M. 2006. Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales? Oikos, 114(2): 257-264. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14443.x.
38. Henkel, L.A. 2009. Co-occurrence and aggregation of marine birds and mammals in Monterey Bay, California, USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 387: 295-303. doi:10.3354/meps08082.
39. Hobson, K.A. 1990. Stable isotope analysis of Marbled Murrelets: evidence for freshwater feeding and determination of trophic level. Condor, 92(4): 897-903. doi:10.2307/1368725.
40. Hobson, K.A., Piatt, J.F., and Pitocchelli, J. 1994. Using stable isotopes to determine seabird trophic relationships. J. Anim. Ecol. 63(4): 786-798. doi:10.2307/5256.
41. Hoffman, W., Heinemann, D., and Wiens, J.A. 1981. The ecology of seabird feeding flocks in Alaska. Auk, 98(3): 437-456.
42. Hunt, G.L. 1995. Monospecific and mixed species foraging associations of Marbled Murrelets. In Ecology and conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. Edited by C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt, M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, Calif. Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PSW-GTR-152. pp. 255-256.
43. Kuletz, K.J. 2005. Foraging behavior and productivity of a noncolonial seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), relative to prey and habitat. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.
44. Lance, M.M., and Thompson, C.W. 2005. Overlap in diets and foraging of Common Murres (Uria aalge) and Rhinoceros Auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata) after the breeding season. Auk, 122(3): 887-901. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0887:OIDAFO]2.0.CO;2.
45. Lewis, S., Sherratt, T.N., Hamer, K.C., and Wanless, S. 2001. Evidence of intra-specific competition for food in a pelagic seabird. Nature (London), 412(6849): 816-819. doi:10.1038/35090566. PMID:11518965.
46. Lovette, I.J., and Hochachka, W.M. 2006. Simultaneous effects of phylogenetic niche conservatism and competition on avian community structure. Ecology, 87(Suppl. 7): S14-S28. doi:10. 1890/0012-9658(2006)87[14:SEOPNC]2.0.CO;2. PMID:16922299.
47. MacArthur, R.H. 1958. Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology, 39(4): 599-619. doi:10. 2307/1931600.
48. Maniscalco, J.M., Ostrand, W.D., Suryan, R.M., and Irons, D.B. 2001. Passive interference competition by Glaucous-winged Gulls on Black-legged Kittiwakes: a cost of feeding in flocks. Condor, 103(3): 616-619. doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0616:PICBGW]2.0.CO;2.
49. Mathews, N.J.C., and Burger, A.E. 1998. Diving depth of a Marbled Murrelet. Northwest. Nat., 79(2): 70-71. doi:10.2307/3536705.
50. Mills, A.M. 2007. Foraging segregation in a breeding bird guild declines following nesting. Can. J. Zool. 85(1): 141-150. doi:10.1139/Z06-194.
51. Nilsson, P.A., Nilsson, K., and Nystrom, P. 2000. Does risk of intraspecific interactions induce shifts in prey-size preference in aquatic predators? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48(4): 268-275. doi:10.1007/s002650000235.
52. O'Sullivan, D., and Unwin, D.J. 2003. Geographical information analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J.
53. Ostrand, W.D. 1999. Marbled Murrelets as initiators of feeding flocks in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Waterbirds, 22(2): 314-318.
54. Ostrand, W.D., Coyle, K.O., Drew, G.S., Maniscalco, J.M., and Irons, D.B. 1998. Selection of forage-fish schools by Murrelets and Tufted Puffins in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Condor, 100(2): 286-297. doi:10.2307/1370269.
55. Parker, M.W., Kress, S.W., Golightly, R.T., Carter, H.R., Parsons, E. B., Schubel, S.E., Boyce, J.A., McChesney, G.J., and Wisely, S.M. 2007. Assessment of social attraction techniques used to restore a Common Murre colony in central California. Waterbirds, 30(1): 17-28. doi:10.1675/1524-4695(2007)030[0017:AOSATU]2.0.CO;2.
56. Perry, J.N., Liebhold, A.M., Rosenberg, M.S., Dungan, J., Miriti, M., Jakomulska, A., and Citron-Pousty, S. 2002. Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography, 25(5): 578-600. doi:10. 1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x.
57. Piatt, J.F. 1987. Behavioural ecology of Common Murre and Atlantic Puffin predation on capelin: implications for population biology. Ph.D. thesis,Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L.
58. Piatt, J.F. 1990. The aggregative response of common murres and Atlantic puffins to schools of capelin. Stud. Avian Biol. 14: 36-51.
59. Porter, J.M., and Sealy, S.G. 1981. Dynamics of seabird multispecies feeding flocks: chronology of flocking in Barkley Sound, British Columbia, in 1979. Colon. Waterbirds, 4: 104-113. doi:10.2307/1521122.
60. Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I., and Benard, M.F. 2005. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology, 86(2): 501-509. doi:10.1890/04-0719.
61. Robards, M.D., and Piatt, J.F. 1999. Biology of the genus Ammodytes, the sand lances. In Sand lance: a review of biology and predator relations and annotated bibliography. Edited by M.D. Robards, M.F. Willson, R.H. Armstrong, and J.F. Piatt. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Ore. Res. Pap. No. PNW-RP-521. pp. 1-16.
62. Rome, M.S., and Ellis, J.C. 2004. Foraging ecology and interactions between Herring Gulls and Great Black-backed Gulls in New England. Waterbirds, 27(2): 200-210. doi:10.1675/1524-4695 (2004)027[0200:FEAIBH]2.0.CO;2.
63. Ronconi, R.A. 2008. Patterns and processes of marine habitat selection: foraging ecology, competition and coexistence among coastal seabirds. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.
64. Ronconi, R.A., and Burger, A.E. 2008. Limited foraging flexibility: increased foraging effort by a marine predator does not buffer against scarce prey. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 366: 245-258. doi:10.3354/meps07529.
65. Ronconi, R.A., and Burger, A.E. 2009. Estimating seabird densities from vessel transects: distance sampling and implications for strip transects. Aquat. Biol. 4(3): 297-309. doi:10.3354/ab00112.
66. Ronconi, R.A., and St. Clair, C.C. 2002. Management options to reduce boat disturbance on foraging black guillemots (Cepphus grylle) in the Bay of Fundy. Biol. Conserv. 108(3): 265-271. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00126-X.
67. Safina, C. 1990. Bluefish mediation of foraging competition between Roseate and Common Terns. Ecology, 71(5): 1804-1809. doi:10. 2307/1937588.
68. Schoener, T.W. 1982. The controversy over interspecific competition. Am. Sci. 70: 586-595.
69. Shealer, D.A., and Burger, J. 1993. Effects of interference competition on the foraging activity of tropical Roseate Terns. Condor, 95(2): 322-329. doi:10.2307/1369355.
70. Silverman, E.D., and Veit, R.R. 2001. Associations among Antarctic seabirds in mixed species feeding flocks. Ibis, 143(1): 51-62. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2001.tb04169.x.
71. Silverman, E.D., Veit, R.R., and Nevitt, G.A. 2004. Nearest neighbors as foraging cues: information transfer in a patchy environment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 277: 25-35. doi:10.3354/meps277025.
72. Speckman, S.G., Piatt, J.F., and Springer, A.M. 2003. Deciphering the social structure of Marbled Murrelets from behavioral observations at sea. Waterbirds, 26(3): 266-274. doi:10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0266:DTSSOM]2.0.CO;2.
73. Strachan, G., McAllister, M., and Ralph, C.J. 1995. Marbled Murrelet at-sea and foraging behavior. In Ecology and conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. Edited by C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt, M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, Calif. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-152. pp. 247-253.
74. Triplet, P., Stillman, R.A., and Goss-Custard, J.D. 1999. Prey abundance and the strength of interference in a foraging shorebird. J.Anim. Ecol. 68(2): 254-265. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00280.x.
75. Vermeer, K., Sealy, S.G., and Sanger, G.A. 1987. Feeding ecology of Alcidae in the eastern North Pacific Ocean. In Seabirds: feeding biology and role in marine ecosystems. Edited by J.P. Croxall. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 187-227.
76. Wittenberger, J.F., and Hunt, G.L. 1985. The adaptive significance of coloniality in birds. In Avian biology. Vol. 8. Edited by D.S. Farner, J.R. King, and K.C. Parkes. Academic Press, Toronto. pp. 1-77.
77. Wong, S.N.P., Ronconi, R.A., Burger, A.E., and Hansen, B. 2008. Marine distribution and behavior of juvenile and adult Marbled Murrelets off southwest Vancouver Island, British Columbia: applications for monitoring. Condor, 110(2): 306-315. doi:10. 1525/cond.2008.8377.