Law and the political geography of US corporate regulation

Space and Polity

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-20

  Pendras, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC POLICY; FINANCIAL CRISIS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; POLITICAL ECONOMY; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; POLITICAL INTEGRATION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953893843     PISSN: 13562576     EISSN: 14701235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2011.567896     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. American Law Review (1874) Editorial: the Dartmouth College case, American Law Review, 8, pp. 189-239
2. BAKAN, J. (2004) The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York: Free Press.
3. BARLYN, S. (2009) How the rules developed, The Wall Street Journal, Business, 30 March.
4. BEBCHUK, L. A. and HAMDANI, A. (2002) Vigorous race or leisurely walk: reconsidering the competition over corporate charters, Yale Law Journal, 112, pp. 553-616.
5. BECHT, M., MAYER, C. and WAGNER, H. F. (2008) Where do firms incorporate? Deregulation and the cost of entry, Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, pp. 241-256.
6. BENSON, R. and DUGGER, R. (1999) Challenging Corporate Rule. New York: The Apex Press.
7. BLOMLEY, N. (1994) Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York: The Guilford Press.
8. BLOMLEY, N., DELANEY, D. and FORD, R. T. (2001) The Legal Geographies Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. BLUESTONE, B. and HARRISON, B. (1982) The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
10. BLUMBERG, P. L. (1990) The corporate personality in American law: a summary review, The American Journal of Comparative Law Supplement, 38, pp. 49-69.
11. BRANDEIS, L. (1933) Dissent: Liggett v Lee, 288 U.S. 517.
12. BRYANT, R. L. and GOODMAN, M. K. (2004) Consuming narratives: the political ecology of 'alternative' consumption, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, pp. 344-366.
13. BUTLER, H. N. (1985) Nineteenth century jurisdictional competition in the granting of corporate privileges, The Journal of Legal Studies, 14, pp. 129-166.
14. CARY, W. (1974) Federalism and corporate law: reflections on Delaware, Yale Law Journal, 83(4), pp. 663-705.
15. CASTELLS, M. (1989) The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban Regional Process. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
16. CASTREE, N. (2004) The geographical lives of commodities: problems of analysis and critique, Social and Cultural Geography, 5, pp. 21-35.
17. CLARK, G. (1981) Law, the state, and the spatial integration of the United States, Environment and Planning A, 13, pp. 1197-1232.
18. CLARK, G. (1989) Unions and Communities under Siege. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. CLINARD, M. B. (1990) Corporate Corruption: The Abuse of Power. New York: Praeger.
20. COOK, I. (2004) Follow the thing: papaya, Antipode, 36, pp. 642-664.
21. COOKE, P. (1989) Locality-theory and the poverty of spatial variation, Antipode, 23, pp. 261-273.
22. COX, K. R. and MAIR, A. (1991) From localised social structures to localities as agents, Environment and Planning A, 23, pp. 197-213.
23. CRAY, C. and DRUTMAN, L. (2005) Corporations and the public purpose: restoring the balance, Seattle Journal of Social Justice, 4, pp. 305-361.
24. DEWEY, J. (1926) The historic background of corporate legal personality, Yale Law Journal, 35, pp. 655-673.
25. DINAPOLI, T. P. (2009) New York needsWall Street to swim, Los Angeles Times, National News, 6 February.
26. DUNCAN, S. and SAVAGE, M. (1989) Space, scale and locality, Antipode, 23, pp. 179-206.
27. FOSTER, J.W. (2005) The trinational alliance against NAFTA: sinews of solidarity, in: J. BANDYand J. SMITH (Eds) Coalitions across Borders, pp. 209-230. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
28. FRUG, G. (1980) The city as a legal concept, Harvard Law Review, 93, pp. 1057-1154.
29. FRUG, G. and BARRON, D. (2008) City Bound. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. Georgetown Law Journal (1972) Federal chartering of corporations: a proposal, Georgetown Law Journal, 61, pp. 89-121.
31. GIBSON-GRAHAM, J. K. (1996) The End of Capitalism (AsWe Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
32. GIBSONGRAHAM, J. K. (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
33. GOODMAN, M. (2004) Reading Fair Trade: political ecological imaginary and the moral economy of Fair Trade foods, Political Geography, 23, pp. 891-915.
34. GORDON, C. (1994) New Deals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. GOSS, J. (2006) Geographies of consumption: the work of consumption, Progress in Human Geography, 30, pp. 237-249.
36. GRANDY, C. J. (1987) The economics of multiple governments: New Jersey corporate chartermongering, 1875-1929. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.
37. HAGER, M. (1989) Bodies politic: the progressive history of organizational 'real entity' theory, The University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 50, pp. 575-654.
38. HAMILTON, T. (2009) Power in numbers: a call for analytical generosity toward new political strategies, Environment and Planning A, 41, pp. 284-301.
39. HARTMANN, T. (2002) Unequal Protection. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
40. HARVEY, D. (1982) The Limits to Capital. London: Verso.
41. HARVEY, D. (1989) The Urban Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
42. HAWLEY, E. (1966) The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43. HENDERSON, G. (1918) The Position of Foreign Corporations in American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. HEROD, A. (1991) Local political practice in response to a manufacturing plant closure: how geography complicates class analysis, Antipode, 23, pp. 385-402.
45. HORWITZ, M. J. (1985) Santa Clara revisited: the development of corporate theory, West Virginia Law Review, 88, pp. 173-224.
46. HUGHES, A. and REIMER, S. (2004) Introduction: geographies of commodity chains, in: A. HUGHES and S. REIMER (Eds) Geographies of Commodity Chains, pp. 1-16. London: Routledge.
47. HURST, J. W. (1970) The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780-1970. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.
48. KIENINGER, E. M. (2004) The legal framework of regulatory competition based on company mobility: E.U. and U.S. compared, German Law Journal, 6(4), pp. 741-770.
49. KOLKO, G. (1965) Railroads and Regulation: 1877-1916. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50. LABATON, S. (1999) Congress passes wide ranging bill easing bank laws, The New York Times, Business, 5 November.
51. LABATON, S. (2008) The reckoning: agency's '04 rule lets banks pile up debt, The New York Times,Business, 2 October.
52. LINZEY, T. (1995) Awakening a sleeping giant: creating a quasi-private cause of action for revoking corporate charters in response to environmental violations, Pace Environmental Law Review, 13, pp. 219-280.
53. LLEWELLYN, J. (2007) Regulation: government, business, and the self in the United States, in: S. MAY, G. CHENEY and J. ROPER (Eds) The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 177-189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. MACHEN, A. W. (1911) Corporate personality, Harvard Law Review, 24, pp. 253-267.
55. MAITLAND, F. W. (1911) The Collected Papers of William Frederic Maitland, ed. by H. A. L. FISHER. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. MARK, G. A. (1987) The personification of the business corporation in American law, University of Chicago Law Review, 54, pp. 1441-1483.
57. MARK, G. A. (1997) The court and the corporation: jurisprudence, localism, and federalism, The Supreme Court Review, 1997, pp. 403-437.
58. MASSEY, D. (1984) Spatial Divisions of Labour. New York: Routledge.
59. MAYER, C. J. (1990) Personalizing the impersonal: corporations and the bill of rights, Hastings Law Journal, 41, pp. 577-667.
60. MCCRAW, T. K. (1984) Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
61. MILLON, D. (1990) Theories of the corporation,Duke Law Journal, April, pp. 201-262.
62. MITCHELL, D. (1997) State restructuring and the importance of 'rights-talk, in: L. STAEHELI, J. KODRAS and C. FLINT (Eds) State Devolution in America, pp. 118-140. New York: Sage.
63. NACE, T. (2005) Gangs of America. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
64. NADER, R., GREEN, M. and SELIGMAN, J. (1976) Constitutionalizing the corporation: the case for the federal chartering of giant corporations. The Corporate Accountability Research Group.
65. O'CONNOR, M. (1990) Restructuring the corporation's nexus of contracts: recognizing a fiduciary duty to protect displaced workers, North Carolina Law Review, 69, pp. 1189-1260. Paul v. Virginia (1868) 75 U.S. 168.
66. PENDRAS, M. (2009) Urban politics and the production of capital mobility in the United States, Environment and Planning A, 41, pp. 1691-1706.
67. PENDRAS, M. (2010) Confronting capital mobility, Urban Geography, 31, pp. 479-497.
68. Pensacola Telegraph Company v. Western Union Telegraph Company (1877) 96 U.S. 1.
69. POLANYI, K.(1944/2001) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
70. RANIS, P. (2006) Factories without bosses: Argentina's experience with worker-run enterprises, Labor, 3(1), pp. 11-24.
71. SADLER, D. (2004) Anti-corporate campaigning and corporate 'social' responsibility: towards alternative spaces of citizenship, Antipode, 36, pp. 851-870.
72. SADLER, D. and LLOYD, S. (2009) Neo-liberalising corporate social responsibility: a political economy of corporate citizenship, Geoforum, 40, pp. 613-622.
73. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) 118 U.S. 394.
74. SCHANE, S. A. (1987) The corporation is a person: the language of a legal fiction, Tulane Law Review, 61, pp. 563-610.
75. SCHWARTZ, D. E. (1972) Federal chartering of corporations: an introduction, Georgetown Law Journal, 61, pp. 71-88.
76. SEEGER, M. W. and HIPFEL, S. J. (2007) Legal versus ethical arguments: contexts for corporate social responsibility, in: S. MAY, G. CHENEY and J. ROPER (Eds) The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 155-166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. SEIDMAN, G. W. (2005) Monitoring multinationals: corporate codes of conduct, in: J. BANDY and J. SMITH (Eds) Coalitions across Borders, pp. 163-186. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
78. SINGER, W. J. (1988) The reliance interest in property, Stanford Law Review, 40, pp. 611-751.
79. SKOCPOL, T. and FINEGOLD, K. (1982) State capacity and economic intervention in the early new deal, Political Science Quarterly, 97, pp. 255-278.
80. SMITH, N. (1984) Uneven Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
81. SMITH, N. (1993) Homeless/global: scaling places, in: J. BIRD, B.CURTIS, T. PUTNAM et al. (Eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, pp. 87-119. London: Routledge.
82. STMARTIN, K. (2007) The difference that class makes: neoliberalization and non-capitalism in the fishing industry of New England, Antipode, 39(3), pp. 527-549.
83. SWYNGEDOUW, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: 'glocalization' and the politics of scale, in K. COX (Ed.) Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, pp. 137-166. London: Guilford Press.
84. The Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) 17 U.S. 518.
85. WEINSTEIN, J. (1968) The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State: 1900-1918. Boston, MA: Beach Press.
86. WILLIAMSON, T., IMBROSCIO, D. and ALPEROVITZ, G. (2002) Making a Place for Community. New York: Routledge.