A novel modification for removal of the polyethylene core in artificial disc retrieval using a transpsoas minimally invasive technique: Technical note

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 466-469

  Cheng, Wayne K ^a   Jadhav, Vikram ^a   Palmer, Daniel K ^a  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial disc retrieval; Polyethylene core; Transpsoas minimally invasive approach

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CASE REPORT; CLAMP; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT POSITIONING; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPINE FRACTURE; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLITIS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 79953887423     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE09429     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bertagnoli R, Zigler J, Karg A, Voigt S: Complications and strategies for revision surgery in total disc replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 36:389-395, 2005 (Pubitemid 40805100)
2. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS: Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:411-415, 2006 (Pubitemid 44197592)
3. Freeman BJC, Davenport J: Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15 (3 Suppl 3):S439-S447, 2006
4. Kostuik JP: Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty. Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):289S-291S, 2004
5. Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, Aunoble S, Hoste D, Bley B, et al: Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 36:315-322, 2005 (Pubitemid 40805092)
6. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583, 2005 (Pubitemid 41022418)
7. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS, Moore SV, Regan JJ, Guyer RD, et al: Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Spine 31:1217-1226, 2006
8. Pimenta L, Díaz RC, Guerrero LG: Charité lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 5:556-561, 2006 (Pubitemid 47325346)
9. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan- Klostermann C, et al: Charité total disc replacement - clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183-195, 2006
10. Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A: Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine 31:1923-1932, 2006
11. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ: Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369-383, 2003 (Pubitemid 43027020)
12. van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, Noten H, van Rhijn L: Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients. Spine 32:223-229, 2007 (Pubitemid 46105809)