Time-frequency analyses of tide-gauge sensor data

Sensors

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 3939-3961

  Erol, Serdar ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cross wavelet transform; LSSA; Neural networks; Sea level; Spectral analysis; Tide gauge sensors; Time series; Time frequency analysis; Wavelet coherence; Wavelet transform

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMAN; SEA; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TSUNAMI; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ALGORITHMS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); OCEANS AND SEAS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; TIDAL WAVES; TURKEY;

EID: 79953883465     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s110403939     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Shankar, D. Seasonal cycle of sea level and currents along the coast of India. Curr. Sci. 2000, 78, 279-288.
2. URL1. Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL); Available online: http://www.psmsl.org/ (accessed on 21 February 2011).
3. Maraun, D.; Kurths, J. Cross wavelet analysis: Significance testing and pitfalls. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 2004, 11, 505-514.
4. Makarynskyy, O.; Makarynska, D.; Kuhn, M.; Featherstone, W.E. Predicting sea-level variations with artificial neural networks at Hillarys Boat Harbour, Western Australia. Estuari. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2004, 61, 351-360.
5. Li, Q. Periodicity and hemispheric phase relationship in high-latitude solar activity. Sol. Phys. 2008, 249, 135-145.
6. Vaniček, P. Approximate spectral analysis by least squares fit. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1969, 4, 387-391.
7. Vaniček, P. Further development and properties of the spectral analysis by least-squares. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1971, 12, 10-33.
8. Taylor, J.; Hamilton, S. Some tests of the Vaniček method of spectral analysis. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1972, 17, 357-367.
9. Maul, G.A.; Yanaway, A. Deep Sea Tides Determination from GEOS-3; NASA Contract Report 141435; NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories: Miami, FL, USA, 1978.
10. Press, W.H.; Teukolsky, S.A. Search algorithm for weak periodic signals in unevenly spaced data. Comput. Phys. 1988, 2, 77-82.
11. Hui, Y.; Pagiatakis, S.D. Least squares spectral analysis and its application to superconducting gravimeter data analysis. Geo Spatial Inform. Sci. 2004, 7, 279-283.
12. Steeves, R.R. Estimation of Gravity Tilt Response to Atmospheric Phenomena at the Fredericton Tiltimetric Station, Using a Least Squares Response Method; Technical Report 79; Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick: Fredericton, NB, Canada, 1981.
13. Merry, C.L.; Vaniček, P. The Zero Frequency Response of Sea Level to Meteorological Influences; Technical Report 82; Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick: Fredericton, NB, Canada, 1981.
14. Delikaraoglou, D. Adjustment and filtering of SEASAT altimetry with the least squares response technique. Mar. Geophys. Res. 1984, 7, 33-54.
15. Craymer, M.R. The Least Squares Spectrum, Its Inverse Transform and Autocorrelation Function: Theory and Some Applications in Geodesy. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1998.
16. Pagiatakis, S.D. Stochastic significance of peaks in the least-squares spectrum. J. Geodesy 1999, 73, 67-78.
17. Pagiatakis, S.D. Application of the least squares spectral analysis to superconducting gravimeter data treatment and analysis. ECGS 2000, 17, 103-113.
18. Erol, S.; Erol, B.; Çelik, R.N. Analysing and prediction of sea level variations for semi-enclosed seas: Case study over Turkey. In Proceedings of the First Symposium of International Gravity Field Service, Istanbul, Turkey, 28 August-1 September 2006.
19. Erol, B. Evaluation of high-precision sensors in structural monitoring. Sensors 2010, 10, 10803-10827.
20. Amerian, Y.; Voosoghi, B. Least squares spectral analysis for detection of systematic behaviour of digital level compensator. J. Geodetic Sci. 2011, 1, 35-40.
21. Lomb, N.R. Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1976, 39, 447-462.
22. Scargle, J.D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J. 1982, 263, 835-853.
23. Daubechies, I. The wavelet transform time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1990, 5, 961-1005.
24. Foufoula-Georgiou, E.; Kumar, P. Wavelets in Geophysics; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1994.
25. Daubechies, I. Ten lectures on wavelets. In CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1992.
26. Torrence, C.; Compo, G.P. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1998, 79, 61-78.
27. Torrence, C.; Webster, P.J. Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1999, 12, 2679-2690.
28. Zhou, Y.H.; Zheng, D.W.; Liao, X.H. Wavelet analysis of interannual LOD, AAM, and ENSO: 1997-98 El Niňo and 1998-99 La Niňo signals. J. Geodesy 2001, 75, 164-168.
29. Jevrejeva, S.; Moore, J.C.; Grinsted, A. Influence of the Arctic Oscillation and El Niňo-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 4677-4687.
30. Grinsted, A.; Moore, J.C.; Jevrejeva, S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 2004, 11, 561-566.
31. Domingues, M.O.; Mendes, O.J.; Da Costa, A.M. On wavelet techniques in atmospheric sciences. Adv. Space Res. 2005, 35, 831-842.
32. Erol, B.; Sideris, M.G.; Çelik, R.N. Comparison of global geopotential models from the CHAMP and GRACE missions for regional geoid modeling in Turkey. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 2009, 53, 419-441.
33. Salerno, F.; Tartari, G. A coupled approach of hydrological modelling and wavelet analysis for the base-flow components of river discharged in karst environments. J. Hydrol.2009, 376, 295-306.
34. Li, K.J.; Gao, P.X.; Zhan, L.S.; Shi, X.J.; Zhu, W.W. Relative phase analyses of long-term hemispheric solar flare activity. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2010, 401, 342-346.
35. Jwo, D.J.; Chin, K.P. Applying back-propagation neural networks to GDOP approximation. J. Navig. 2002, 55, 97-108.
36. Mičušík, D.; Stopjaková, V.; Beňušková, L. Application of feed-forward artificial neural networks to the identification of defective analog integrated circuit. Neural Comput. Appl. 2002, 11, 71-79.
37. Schuh, H.; Ulrich, M.; Egger, D.; Müller, J.; Schwegmann, W. Prediction of earth orientation parameters by artificial neural networks. J. Geodesy 2002, 76, 247-258.
38. Crone, S.F. Prediction of white noise time series using artificial neural networks and asymmetric cost functions. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN'03, Portland, OR, USA, July 2003,
39. Yildiz, H.; Demir, C. Digital and automatic tide gauges with acoustic sea level sensors and meteorological systems in Turkey. In Proceedings of Final Workshop of COST Action 40, Sea Level in Europe: Observation, Interpretation and Explotation, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 19-21 September 2001; pp. 21-24.
40. Demir, C.; Gürdal, M.A. Sea level monitoring activities in Turkey. In Proceedings of MedGloss Workshop, Haifa, Israel, May 2000.
41. IOC. Manual on Sea Level Measurement and Interpretation: Reappraisals and Recommendations as of the Year 2000; Manual and Guides UNESCO, IOC: Paris, France, 2000; p. 57.
42. Yildiz, H.; Demir, C.; Gürdal, M.A.; Akabali, O.A.; Demirkol, E.Ö.; Ayhan, M.E.; Türkoǧlu, Y. Analysis of sea level and geodetic measurements of Antalya-II, Bodrum-II, Erdek and Menteş tide gauges in the period of 1984-2002. J. Mapp. 2003, 17, 1-75.
43. IOC. Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS) Implementation Plan-1997; Manual and Guides UNESCO, IOC: Paris, France, 1997.
44. Aquatrak. User's Guide Model 4100/4110 Series; Aquatrak Corporation: Sanford, FL, USA, 2006; p. 53.
45. Pugh, D.T. Tides, Surges and Mean Sea-Level: A Handbook for Engineers and Scientists; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1998; p. 472.
46. Pytharouli, S.; Kontogianni, V.; Psimoulis P.; Stiros, S. Spectral analysis techniques in deformation analysis studies. In Proceedings of the INGEO 2004 and FIG Regional Central and Eastern European Conference on Engineering Surveying, Bratislava, Slovakia, 11-13 November 2004.
47. Li, K.J.; Gao, P.X.; Zhan, L.S. Synchronization of hemispheric sunspot activity revised: Wavelet transform analyses. Astrophys. J. 2009, 691, 537-546.
48. Chellali, F.; Khellaf, A.; Belouchrani, A. Wavelet spectral analysis of the temperature and wind speed data. Renew. Energ. 2009, 35, 1214-1219.
49. Kavzaoǧlu, T.; Saka, M.H. Modelling local GPS/levelling geoid undulations using artificial neural networks. J. Geodesy 2005, 78, 520-527.
50. Abrahart, R.J.; See, L.; Kneal, P.E. Investigating the role of saliency analysis with neural network rainfall-runoff model. Comput. Geosci. 2001, 27, 921-928.
51. Hilbert, D.W.; Ostendorf, B. The utility of artificial neural networks for modelling the distribution of vegetation in past, present and future climates. Ecol. Model. 2001, 146, 311-327.
52. Mackay, D.S.; Robinson, V.B. A multiple criteria decision support system for testing integrated environmental models. Fuzzy Set Syst. 2000, 113, 53-67.
53. Roske, F. Sea level forecasts using neural networks. Ger. J. Hydrography 1997, 49, 71-99.
54. Huang, W.; Murray, C.; Kraus, N.; Rosati, J. Development of a regional neural network for coastal water level predictions. Ocean Eng. 2003, 30, 2275-2295.
55. Makarynskyy, O.; Kuhn, M.; Makarynska, D.; Featherstone, W.E. The use of artificial neural networks to retrieve sea-level information from remote data sources. In Proceedings of International Association of Geodesy International Symposium: Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions (GGSM2004), Porto, Portugal, 30 August-3 September 2004.
56. Wenzel, M.; Schröter, J. Reconstruction of regional mean sea level anomalies from tide gauges using neural networks. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, C08013:1-C08013:15.
57. Laguna, P.; Moody, G.B.; Mark, R.G. Power spectral density of unevenly sampled data by least-square analysis: Performance and application to heart rate signals. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 45, 698-715.
58. Vaniček, P.; Krakiwsky, E.J. Geodesy: The Concepts, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Science Pub. Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986.
59. Wells, D.E.; Vaniček, P.; Pagiatakis, S.D. Least Squares Spectral Analysis Revisited; Technical Report 84; Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick: Fredericton, Canada, 1985.
60. El-Diasty, M.; El-Rabbany, A.; Pagiatakis, S. Temperature variation effects on stochastic characteristics for low-cost MEMS-based inertial sensor error. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 3321-3328.
61. Jenkins, G.M.; Watts, D.G. Spectral Analysis and Its Applications; Holden-Day: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1968.
62. Blamire, P.A. The influence of relative sample size in training artificial neural networks. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1996, 17, 223-230.
63. Rumelhart, D.E.; McClelland, J.L. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986.
64. Suratgar, A.A.; Tavakoli, M.B.; Hoseinabadi, A. Modified Levenberg-Marquart method for neural networks training. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2005, 6, 46-48.
65. Kaiser, G. A Friendly Guide to Wavelets; Birkhauser: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 44-45.
66. URL2. Time-Frequency Analysis of EEG Using the Wavelet Transform; Homepage of André Mouraux; Available online: http://amouraux.webnode.com/research-interests/ (accessed on 21 February 2011).
67. Haykin, S. Neural Networks; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999.