Transformative use of information technology in American literary writing: A pilot survey of literary community members

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 947-962

  Paling, Stephen ^a   Martin, Crystle ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; HUMAN ACTOR; PILOT SURVEYS; QUALITATIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SAMPLE SIZES;

SURVEYS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79953875324     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21514     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bourdieu, P., (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
2. Geyh, P., (2002). The literary magazine, the Web, and the changing of the avant-garde. In, L. Hurliman, & N., C. Kunakemakorn, (Eds.). Without Covers://literary-magazines@the-digital-edge. West Lafayette, IN: Notabell.
3. Giddens, A., (1976). New rules for sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
4. Giddens, A., (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California.
5. Harrell, J., &, Linkugel, W.A., (1978). On rhetorical genre: An organizing perspective. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 11 (4), 262-281.
6. Hoffman, F., Allen, C., &, Ulrich, C., (1946). The little magazine: A history and bibliography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
7. Kling, R., (1999). What is Social Informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib 5. Retrieved September 12, 2006;.
8. Kling, R., &, McKim, G., (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(14), 1306-1320. (Pubitemid 32074830)
9. Miller, C., (1994). Genre as social action. In, A. Freedman, &, P. Medway, (Eds.)., Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis. (Reprinted from the Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167, 1984).
10. Paling, S., (2008). Technology, genres, and value change: Literary authors and aesthetic use of information technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (8), 1238-1251.
11. Paling, S., (in press). Developing a metadata element set for organizing literary works: A survey of the American literary community. Knowledge Organization.
12. Paling, S., &, Nilan, M., (2006). Technology, values, and genre change: the case of little magazines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (7), 862-872. (Pubitemid 43734454)
13. Paré, A., &, Smart, G., (1994). Observing genres in action: Toward a research methodology. In, A. Freedman, &, P. Medway, (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 146-154). Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
14. Rettberg, S., (2009). Communitizing electronic literature. Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (1). Retrieved August 16, 2010, from.
15. Svennson, C., (1991). No horror of the blank sheet-the word processor in literary use. Poetics, 20 (1), 27-51.