A method for three-dimensional evaluation and computer aided treatment of femoroacetabular impingement

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 143-148

  Audenaert, E ^a   Vigneron, L ^b   Pattyn, C ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b Orthopaedic Department   (Belgium)

Author keywords

computer assisted diagnosis; customized treatment; femoroacetabular impingement; Hip; navigated surgery

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMORACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79953838801     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2011.557856     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P. The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: A survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Acta Radiol 2008;49(4):436-441. (Pubitemid 351598799)
2. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: Femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(7):1012-1018. (Pubitemid 40984279)
3. Chegini S, Beck M, Ferguson SJ. The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: A finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 2007;27(2):195-201.
4. Arbabi E, Chegini S, Boulic R, Tannast M, Ferguson SJ, Thalmann D. Penetration depth method - novel real-time strategy for evaluating femoroacetabular impingement.J Orthop Res 2010;28(7):880-886.
5. Johnston TL, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ.Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 2008;24(6):669-675.
6. Zebaze RM, Jones A, Welsh A, Knackstedt M, Seeman E.Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: Clinical and biomechanical implications. Bone 2005;37(2):243-252. (Pubitemid 40962433)
7. Howe WG. Two-sided tolerance limits for normal populations - some improvements. J Am Statist Assoc 1969;64:610-620.
8. Thornberry RL, Hogan AJ. The combined use of simulation and navigation to demonstrate hip kinematics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(Suppl 1):144-152.
9. Arbabi E, Boulic R, Thalmann D. Fast collision detection methods for joint surfaces. J Biomech 2009;42(2):91-99.
10. Crawford MJ, Dy CJ, Alexander JW, Thompson M, Schroder SJ, Vega CE, Patel RV, Miller AR, McCarthy JC, Lowe WR, et al. The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;465:16-22. (Pubitemid 350306489)
11. Audenaert EA, Mahieu P, Pattyn C. Three-dimensional assessment of cam engagement in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 2010;Oct 15 [Epub ahead of print].
12. Audenaert EA, Baelde N, Huysse W, Vigneron L, Pattyn C. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol 2010;Aug 18 [Epub ahead of print].
13. Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog RF. Evaluation of a computed tomography-based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement. Arthroscopy 2009;25(4):382-391.
14. Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Fu FH. Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: Role in the treatment of sports-related injuries. Sports Med 2002;32(13):809-818. (Pubitemid 35305845)