The role of scientific advisory bodies in precaution-based risk governance illustrated with the issue of uncertain health effects of electromagnetic fields

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 451-466

  Van Dijk, Harrie F G ^a   Van Rongen, Eric ^a   Eggermont, Gilbert ^b   Lebret, Erik ^c,d   Bijker, Wiebe E ^e   Timmermans, Daniëlle R M ^f  

^a Health Council of the Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

electromagnetic fields; precaution; scientific advisory bodies

Indexed keywords

BELGIUM; COURSES OF ACTIONS; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION RULES; EXPOSURE REDUCTION; GOVERNMENTAL POLICIES; HEALTH EFFECTS; KEY MESSAGE; NETHERLANDS; POLICY OPTIONS; POLITICAL DECISION; POTENTIAL HEALTH; PRECAUTION; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; RISK GOVERNANCE; SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BODIES;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HEALTH; HEALTH RISKS; PUBLIC POLICY;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS;

EID: 79953798352     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.553729     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Agarwal, A., N.R. Desai, K. Makker, A. Varghese, R. Mouradi, E. Sabanegh, and R. Sharma. 2009. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An invitro pilot study. Fertility and Sterility 92: 1318-25.
2. Ahlbom, A., M. Feychting, A. Green, L. Kheifets, D.A. Savitz, and A.J. Swerdlow. 2009. Epidemiologic evidence on mobile phones and tumor risk: A review. Epidemiology 20, no. 5: 639-52.
3. Asveld, L. 2009. Trust and criteria for proof of risk: The case of mobile phone technology in the Netherlands. In The ethics of technological risk, ed. L. Asveld and S. Roeser, 220-34. London/Stirling, VA: Earthscan.
4. Barnett, J., L. Timotijevic, R. Shepherd, and V. Senior. 2007. Public responses to precautionary information from the Department of Health (UK) about possible health risks from mobile phones. Health Policy 82, no. 2: 240-50. (Pubitemid 46777063)
5. Belgische Regering. 2005. Koninklijk Besluit houdende de normering van zendmasten voor elektromagnetische golven tussen 10 MHz en 10 GHz, 10 augustus 2005. Belgisch Staatsblad 175, no. 291: 41189-93.
6. Bijker, W.E., R. Bal, and R. Hendriks. 2009. The paradox of scientific authority: The role of scientific advice in democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Board of NRPB. 2004. Mobile phones and health 2004. Chilton: National Radiological Protection Board.
8. Bolte, J.F.B., M.J.M. Pruppers, M.J.R. Pennders, and H.F.P.M. van Poll. 2005. Vooronderzoek naar bezorgheid over basisstations voor mobiele telefonie [People's concern about base stations for mobile telecommunication: An exploratory study]. Publication no. 300010003. Bilthoven: RIVM.
9. Brusselse Hoofdstedelijke Gewest. 2007. Ordonnantie betreffende de bescherming van het leefmilieu tegen de eventuele schadelijke effecten en hinder van niet-ioniserende stralingen, 1 maart 2007. Belgisch Staatsblad 177, no. 78: 13693-6.
10. De Luliis, G.N., R.J. Newey, B.V. King, and R.J. Aitken. 2009. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS ONE 4, no. 7: e6446.
11. De Vlaamse Regering. 2004. Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering houdende maatregelen tot bestrijding van de gezondheidsrisico's door verontreiniging van het binnenmilieu, 11 juni 2004. Belgisch Staatsblad 17, no. 369: 72552-6.
12. Divan, H.A., L. Kheifets, C. Obel, and J. Olsen. 2008. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 19, no. 4: 523-9.
13. Duchêne, A. 2008. The early developments in NIR protection. In 15 years on: Reviewing the past and looking forward. ICNIRP workshop on basic radiation protection principles, September 15-16, in Prague.
14. European Health Risk Assessment Network on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure. 2010. D3 - Report on the analysis of risks associated to exposure to EMF: In vitro and in vivo (animals) studies. Bordeau: IMS Laboratory.
15. European Union. 2008. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union 51, no. C115: 1-388.
16. Faure, M.G., and E. Vos, eds. 2003. Juridische afbakening van het voorzorgsbeginsel: mogelijkheden en grenzen. Publication no. A03/03. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
17. Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 9: 127-52.
18. French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety. 2009. Opinion concerning the update of the expert appraisal relating to radiofrequencies. Maisons-Alfort Cedex: Afsset.
19. Gardiner, S.M. 2006. A core precautionary principle. Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 1: 33-60. (Pubitemid 43448596)
20. Gee, D. 2009. Late lessons from early warnings: Towards realism and precaution with EMF? Pathophysiology 16, nos. 2-3: 217-31.
21. Government of the Netherlands, V.N.G., and Telecom Operators. 2010. Convenant in het kader van het nationaal antennebeleid inzake de plaatsing van vergunningvrije antenneinstallaties voor mobiele communicatie. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers. Tweede Kamer Vergaderjaar 2010-2011 27561 no, 39 Annex.
22. Granger Morgan, M., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and C.J. Atman. 2002. Risk communication: A mental models approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hansson, S.O. 1999. Adjusting science practices to the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5, no. 5: 909-21. (Pubitemid 129725196)
24. Harremoës, P., D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, and B. Wynne. 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Environmental Issue report 22. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-issue-report-2001-22 (accessed November 1, 2010).
25. Health Council of the Netherlands. 2003. Health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: Recommendations for research. Publication no. 2003/03E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
26. Health Council of the Netherlands. 2005. Briefadvies mobiele telefoons en gezondheid. Publication no. 2005/03. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
27. Health Council of the Netherlands. 2008. Prudent precaution. Publication no. 2008/18E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
28. Health Council of the Netherlands. 2009. Advisory letter: Power lines and Alzheimer's disease. Publication no. 2009/05E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
29. Health Council of the Netherlands: Electromagnetic Fields Committee. 2000. GSM base stations. Publication No. 2000/16E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
30. Health Council of the Netherlands: Electromagnetic Fields Committee. 2002. Mobile telephones: A health-based analysis. Publication No. 2002/01E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
31. Health Council of the Netherlands: Electromagnetic Fields Committee. 2008. High-voltage power lines (letter report). Publication No. 2008/04. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
32. Health Council of the Netherlands: Electromagnetic Fields Committee. 2009. Electromagnetic fields: Annual update 2008. Publication no. 2009/02. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
33. Health Council of the Netherlands: ELF Electromagnetic Fields Committee. 2000. Exposure to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz-10 MHz). Publication no. 2000/06E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
34. Health Council of the Netherlands: Radiofrequency Radiation Committee. 1997. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (300 Hz-300 GHz). Publication no. 1997/01. Rijswijk: Health Council of the Netherlands.
35. Het Grondwettelijke Hof. 2009. Arrest in zake de beroepen tot vernietiging van de ordonnantie van het Brusselse Hoofdstedelijke Gewest van 1 maart 2007 betreffende de bescherming van het leefmilieu tegen de eventuele schadelijke effecten en hinder van niet-ioniserende stralingen, ingesteld door de nv en anderen, en door de Ministerraad. Arrest 2/2009. [Rolnummers 4277 en 4278], 1-39. 15-1-2009.
36. Huss, A., A. Spoerri, M. Egger, and M. Roosli. 2009. Residence near power lines and mortality from neurodegenerative diseases: Longitudinal study of the Swiss population. American Journal of Epidemiology 169, no. 2: 167-75.
37. Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones. 2000. Mobile phones and health ('Stewart report'). Chilton: National Radiological Protection Board.
38. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2010. Agents classified by the IARC monographs. 1-100 vols. Lyon: IARC. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/ Classification/ ClassificationsGroupOrder.pdf (accessed November 1, 2010).
39. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2009. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz- 300 GHz). Oberschleissheim: ICNIRP. http://www.icnirp.de/documents/RFReview.pdf (accessed November 1, 2010).
40. Jasanoff, S. 2007. Technologies of humility. Nature 450: 33. (Pubitemid 350070552)
41. Jasanoff, S. 2008a. Speaking honestly to power. Review of The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics, by Roger A. Pielke Jr. American Scientist 96, no. 3: 240-43.
42. Jasanoff, S. 2008b. Trading uncertainties: The transatlantic divide in regulating biotechnology. CESifo DICE Report 6, no. 2: 36-43.
43. Lin, J.C. 2009. The multinational study of brain tumours in cell phone users' heads. IEEE Microwave Magazine 10, no. 4: 138-44.
44. Lin, J.C. 2010. Cell-phone popularity, addiction, and funding for biological effect research. IEEE Microwave Magazine 11, no. 5: 118-20.
45. Mailankot, M., A.P. Kunnath, H. Jayalekshmi, B. Koduru, and R. Valsalan. 2009. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8 GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics 64, no. 6: 561-5.
46. Minister van Volkshuisvesting Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer. 2009. Gezondheid en milieu. Brief van de Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers, Tweede Kamer Vergaderjaar 2008-2009, 28089, 23.
47. National Research Council. 1989. Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. Offit, P.A. 2007. Thimerosal and vaccines - A cautionary tale. New England Journal of Medicine 357, no. 13: 1278-9. (Pubitemid 47481449)
49. Pielke, R.A, Jr. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Renn, O. 2005. White paper on risk governance: Towards an integrative approach. International Risk Governance Council: White paper no. 1. http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC-WP-No-1-Risk-Governance-reprinted-version-.pdf (accessed November 1, 2010).
51. Renn, O., and D. Levine. 1991. Credibility and trust in risk communication. In Communicating risks to the public, ed. R.E. Kasperson and P.J.M. Stallen, 175-218. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
52. Rubin, G.J., R. Nieto-Hernandez, and S. Wessely. 2010. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): An updated systematic review of provocation studies 1. Bioelectromagnetics 31, no. 1: 1-11.
53. Ruediger, H.W. 2009. Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Pathophysiology 16, nos. 2-3: 89-102.
54. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2009. Health effects of exposure to EMF. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Health & Consumers.
55. Scientific Council for Government Policy. 2003. Naar nieuwe wegen in het milieubeleid. Report no. 67. The Hague: Scientific Council for Government Policy. http://www.wrr.nl/ content.jsp?objectid=2628 (accessed November 1, 2010).
56. Siegrist, M., T. Earle, and H. Gutscher. 2003. Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis 23: 705-16. (Pubitemid 36929566)
57. Slovic, P., M.L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. Macgregor. 2002. The affect heuristic. In Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement, ed. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 397-420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Soneryd, L. 2007. Deliberations on the unknown, the unsensed, and the unsayable? Public protests and the development of third-generation mobile phones in Sweden. Science Technology & Human Values 32, no. 3: 287-314.
59. Staatssecretaris van Volkshuisvesting Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer. Advies over hoogspanningslijnen aan gemeenten, provincies en netwerkbeheerders. Brief SAS/2005- 183118. 2005. Den Haag Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer.http://www.rijksoverheid. nl/documenten-en-publicaties?#ref-vrom (accessed November 1, 2010).
60. Steele, K. 2006. The precautionary principle: A new approach to public decision-making? Law Probablity and Risk 5: 19-31.
61. Stilgoe, J. 2007. The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks. Public Understanding of Science 16: 45-61. (Pubitemid 44893410)
62. Stirling, A. 2003. Risk, uncertainty and precaution: Some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In Negotiating environmental change: New perspectives from social science, ed. F. Berkhout, M. Leach, and I. Scoones, 33-76. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
63. Stirling, A. 2006. Precaution, foresight and sustainability: Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology. In Reflexive governance for sustainable development, ed. J.-P. Vos, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, 225-72. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64. Superior Health Council. 2000. Advies van de HGR betreffende het Ontwerp van Koninklijk Besluit houdende de normering van zendmasten voor elektromagnetische golven tussen 10 MHz en 10 GHz. ed. Superior Health Council. Report no. 6605. Brussels: Superior Health Council [in Dutch].
65. Superior Health Council. 2004. Aanbevelingen 12 maart 2004 van de HGR met betrekking tot het gebruik van mobiele telefoontoestellen (GSM) door de algemene bevolking. Report no. 6605/5. Brussels: Superior Health Council.
66. Superior Health Council. 2008a. Publicatie van de Hoge Gezondheidsraad nr. 8081 - Aanbevelingen betreffende de blootstelling van de bevolking aan magnetische velden van elektrische installaties 1780. ed. Superior Health Council. Report no. 8081. Brussels: Superior Health Council [in Dutch].
67. Superior Health Council. 2008b. Publicatie van de Hoge Gezondheidsraad nr. 8194 - Mogelijke biologische effecten van gemoduleerde microgolven. ed. Superior Health Council. Report no. 8194. Brussels: Superior Health Council [in Dutch].
68. Superior Health Council. 2009. Advies van de Hoge Gezondheidsraad nr. 8519 - Advies betreffende de normering voor zendmasten. ed. Superior Health Council. Report no. 8519. Brussels: Superior Health Council [in Dutch].
69. Superior Health Council Onderafdeling III-4 Stralingen. 2002. De GSM, veilig mobiel telefoneren? Gebundelde adviezen 2002, Version November 2002. Brussels: Superior Health Council.
70. Timmermans, D.R.M. 1994. The role of experience and domain of expertise in using numerical and verbal probability terms in medical decisions. Medical Decision Making 14: 146-56.
71. United Nations Environment Programme. 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development of United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. http:// www.unep.org/Documents/Default.asp?DocumentID= 78&ArticleID=1163 (accessed November 1, 2010).
72. van Asselt, M., W. Passchier, and M. Krayer von Kraus. 2009. Uncertainty assessment: An analysis of regulatory science on wireless communication technology, RF EMF and cancer risks. Report for the IMBA project. Work Package 1. Epidemiological research & Animal studies (rev. version). Maastricht: Maastricht University.
73. van Rongen, E., R. Croft, J. Juutilainen, I. Lagroye, J. Miyakoshi, R. Saunders, R. de Seze, et al. 2009. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on the human nervous system. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health B 12: 572-97.
74. Vecchia, P., R. Matthes, M. Feychting, A. Green, K. Jokela, J. Lin, A. Peralta, et al. 2009. ICNIRP statement on the 'guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)'. Health Physics 97, no. 3: 257-8.
75. Verschaeve, L. 2009. Genetic damage in subjects exposed to radiofrequency radiation. Mutation Research 681, nos. 2-3: 259-70.
76. Verschaeve, L., J. Juutilainen, I. Lagroye, J. Miyakoshi, R. Saunders, R. de Seze, T. Tenforde, E. van Rongen, B. Veyret, and Z. Xu. 2010. In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of radiofrequency fields. Mutation Research 705, no. 3: 252-68.
77. Viel, J.F., S. Clerc, C. Barrera, R. Rymzhanova, M. Moissonnier, M. Hours, and E. Cardis. 2009. Residential exposure to radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations, and broadcast transmitters: A population-based survey with personal meter. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 66, no. 8: 550-6.
78. Vlek, C., and P.J. Stallen. 1981. Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 28: 235-71.
79. Wertheimer, N., and E. Leeper. 1979. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology 109, no. 3: 273-84. (Pubitemid 10209603)
80. WHO (World Health Organization). 2007. Extremely low frequency fields. Geneva: World Health Organization.
81. Wiedemann, P.M., A.T. Thalmann, M.A. Grutsch, and H. Schütz. 2006. The impacts of precautionary measures and the disclosure of scientific uncertainty on EMF risk perception and trust. Journal of Risk Research 9, no. 4: 361-72. (Pubitemid 43982800)
82. Wiwanitkit, V. 2010. Cellular phone and germ cell: A comment. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 3, no. 1: 52.
83. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. 2005. The Precautionary Principle. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0013/ 001395/139578e.pdf (accessed November 1, 2010).