Effective dose during needle interventions: Cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 455-461

  Braak, Sicco J ^a   Van Strijen, Marco J L ^a   Van Es, Hendrik W ^a   Nievelstein, Rutger A J ^b   Van Heesewijk, Johannes P M ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DOSIMETRY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL BIOPSY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG BIOPSY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEEDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; THORAX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BODY BURDEN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NETHERLANDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79953791097     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277-2284. (Pubitemid 350190758)
2. Stoker J, Kipp JBA, Geleijns K, van der Molen AJ, Venema HW. Radiation exposure in computed tomography in The Netherlands: risk-benefit analysis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2009; 153:348-352.
3. Schaefer PJ, Schaefer FKW, Heller M, Jahnke T. CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of small pulmonary and upper abdominal lesions: efficacy with a modified breathing technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18:1241-1248. (Pubitemid 47449751)
4. Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Wang SS. Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:637-644. (Pubitemid 29395283)
5. Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20(Suppl):S538-S544.
6. Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R, et al. Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189:W357-W364.
7. Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Leersum M, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JPM. Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194:W445-W451.
8. Khelassi-Toutaoui N, Berkani Y, Tsapaki V, et al. Experimental evaluation of PCXMC and prepare codes used in conventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008; 131:374-378.
9. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37:1-331.
10. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991; 21:1-201.
11. Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M. Organ dose calculation in medical x ray examinations by the program PCXMC. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1998; 80:213-219. (Pubitemid 29015526)
12. Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamaguchi I, et al. Effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging with a flat-panel detector angiography system. Radiology 2009; 250:545-550.
13. Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Triantopoulou C, Gorantonaki A, Papailiou J. CT-guided interventional procedures without CT fluoroscopy assistance: patient effective dose and absorbed dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:1479-1484. (Pubitemid 46866847)
14. Hirota S, Nakao N, Yamamoto S, et al. Cone-beam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: early experience in abdominal interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 29:1034-1038. (Pubitemid 44661954)
15. Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Obermann WR, van Persijn van Meerten EL. Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:720-726. (Pubitemid 32791546)
16. Joemai RMS, Zweers D, Obermann WR, Geleijns J. Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192:881-886.
17. Kirchner J, Kickuth R, Laufer U, Schilling EM, Adams S, Liebermann D. CT fluoroscopy-assisted puncture of thoracic and abdominal masses: a randomized trial. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:188-192.
18. Vetter S, Faulkner K, Strecker EP, Busch HP. Dose reduction and image quality in pulsed fluoroscopy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1998; 80:299-301. (Pubitemid 29015544)
19. Hohl C, Suess C, Wildberger JE, et al. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: Phantom study of angular beam modulation. Radiology 2008; 246:519-525.
20. Penzkofer T, Isfort P, Bruners P, et al. Robot arm based flat panel CT-guided electromagnetic tracked spine interventions: phantom and animal model experiments. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:2656-2662.