Biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Texas: Patterns of diversity and threats

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 393-407

  Burlakova, Lyubov E ^a,b   Karatayev, Alexander Y ^a   Karatayev, Vadim A ^b   May, Marsha E ^c   Bennett, Daniel L ^c,d   Cook, Michael J ^d,e  

^a BUFFALO STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT   (United States)

^d STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SWCA Environmental Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Conservation; Diversity; Freshwater molluscs; Human population density; Unionidae

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIOGEOGRAPHY; BIVALVE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION STATUS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDEMIC SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVAPORATION; FOREST COVER; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; HABITAT CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RARE SPECIES; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WATERSHED;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

BIVALVIA; MOLLUSCA; UNIONIDAE;

EID: 79953788908     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00753.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Abell, R., Olson, D., Dinerstein, E., Hurley, P., Diggs, J., Eichbaum, W., Walters, S., Wettengel, W., Allnutt, T., Loucks, C. & Hedao, P. (2000) Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington D.C.
2. Aldridge, D.C., Fayle, T.M. & Jackson, N. (2007) Freshwater mussel abundance predicts biodiversity in UK lowland rivers. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17, 554-564.
3. Alig, R.J. (2007) U.S. land-use changes involving forests: trends and projections. Transactions of the 72nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference (ed. by J. Rahm), pp. 96-108. Portland, Oregon.
4. Alig, R.J. & Plantinga, A.J. (2004) Future forestland area: impacts from population growth and other factors that affect land values. Journal of Forestry, 102, 19-24.
5. Allan, J.D. (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 257-284.
6. Allan, J.D. & Flecker, A.S. (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience, 43, 32-43.
7. Allison, A.A., Hubbs, C., Winemiller, K. & Edwards, R.J. (1995) Texas freshwater fish assemblages following three decades of environmental change. The Southwestern Naturalist, 40, 314-321.
8. American Rivers (2006) America's most endangered rivers of 2006. Available at: (accessed 12 December 2009).
9. Arbuckle, K.E. & Downing, J.A. (2002) Freshwater mussel abundance and species richness: GIS relationships with watershed land use and geology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 310-316.
10. Athearn, H.D. (1970) Discussion of Dr. Heard's paper. Malacologia, 10, 28-31.
11. Bogan, A.E. (1993) Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Molusca: Unionidae): a search for causes. American Zoologist, 33, 599-609.
12. Brainwood, M., Burgin, S. & Byrne, M. (2006) Is the decline of freshwater mussel populations in a regulated coastal river in south-eastern Australia linked with human modification of habitat? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 501-516.
13. Bray, J.R. & Curtis, J.T. (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27, 326-349.
14. Brown, J.H. & Lomolino, M.V. (1998) Biogeography, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
15. Burlakova, L.E., Karatayev, A.Y., Karatayev, V.A., May, M.E., Bennett, D.L. & Cook, M.J. (2011) Endemic species: contribution to community uniqueness, effect of habitat alteration, and conservation priorities. Biological Conservation, 144, 155-165.
16. Burr, B.M. & Mayden, R.L. (1992) Phylogenetics and North American freshwater fishes. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes (ed. by R.L. Mayden), pp. 18-75. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, USA.
17. Clarke, K.R. (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 117-143.
18. Clarke, K.R. & Ainsworth, M. (1993) A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 92, 205-219.
19. Clarke, K.R. & Green, R.H. (1988) Statistical design and analysis for a 'biological effects' study. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 46, 213-226.
20. Clarke, K.R. & Warwick, R.M. (1998) Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities. Oecologia, 113, 278-289.
21. Covich, A.P., Palmer, M.A. & Crowl, T.A. (1999) The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems - Zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. BioScience, 49, 119-127.
22. Cummings, K.S. & Mayer, C.A. (1992) Field guide to freshwater mussels of the Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 5.
23. Dahm, C.N., Edwards, R.J. & Gelwick, F.P. (2005) Gulf Coast rivers of the Southewestern United States. Rivers of North America (ed. by A.C. Benke and C.E. Cushing), pp. 180-228. Academic Press, Burlington.
24. Darwall, W.R.T. & Vie, J.-C. (2005) Identifying important sites for conservation of freshwater biodiversity: extending the species-based approach. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 12, 287-293.
25. Doll, P. & Zhang, J. (2010) Impact of climate change on freshwater ecosystems: a global-scale analysis of ecologically relevant river flow alterations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 783-799.
26. Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z.I., Knowler, D.J., Leveque, C., Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richard, A.H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J. & Sullivan, C.A. (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 81, 163-182.
27. Estaville, L.E. & Earl, R.A. (2008) Texas Water Atlas. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX, USA.
28. Falk, D.A. (1990) Endangered forest resources in the United States - integrated strategies for conservation of rare species and genetic diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 35, 91-117.
29. Feaster, D.M. (1998) Lotic freshwater mussels (family Unionidae) of the Angelina and Davy Crockett National Forests of East Texas. Texas Journal of Science, 50, 163-170.
30. Flather, C.H., Knowles, M.S. & Kendall, I.A. (1998) Threatened and endangered species geography. BioScience, 48, 365-376.
31. Fontaine, B., Bouchet, P., Van Achterberg, K. et al. (2007) The European union's 2010 target: putting rare species in focus. Biological Conservation, 139, 167-185.
32. Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
33. Gaston, K.J. (1998) Rarity as double jeopardy. Nature, 394, 229-230.
34. Gleick, P.H. (2006) The World's water: the Biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press, Washington.
35. Grabarkiewicz, J. & Davis, W. (2008) An introduction to freshwater mussels as biological indicators. EPA-260-R08-015. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Washington, DC. Available at: (accessed 12 March 2010).
36. Haag, W.R. (2010) A hierarchical classification of freshwater mussel diversity in North America. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 12-26.
37. Higgins, J.V., Bryer, M.T., Khoury, M.L. & Fitzhugh, T.W. (2005) A freshwater classification approach for biodiversity conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 19, 432-445.
38. Hornbach, D.J. & Deneka, T. (1996) A comparison of a qualitative and a quantitative collection method for examining freshwater mussel assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15, 587-596.
39. Howells, R.G., Neck, R.W. & Murray, H.D. (1996) Freshwater mussels of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Press, Austin, TX, USA.
40. Hubbs, C. (1957) Distributional patterns of Texas fresh-water fishes. The Southwestern Naturalist, 2, 89-104.
41. Jackson, R.B., Carpenter, S.R., Dahm, C.N., McKnight, D.M., Naiman, R.J., Postel, S.L. & Running, S.W. (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecological Applications, 11, 1027-1045.
42. Johnson, R.I. (1998) A new mussel, Potamilus metnecktayi (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the Rio Grande system, Mexico and Texas with notes on Mexican Disconaias. Occasional Papers on Mollusks, 5, 427-455.
43. Kenkel, N.C. & Orlóci, L. (1986) Applying metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies: some new results. Ecology, 67, 919-928.
44. Kuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., Heikkinen, R.K., Helm, A., Krauss, J., Lindborg, R., Öckinger, E., Pärtel, M., Pino, J., Rodà, F., Stefanescu, C., Teder, T., Zobel, M. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2009) Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 564-571.
45. Lawler, J.J., White, D., Sifneos, J.C. & Master, L.L. (2003) Rare species and the use of indicator groups for conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 17, 875-882.
46. Legendre, P. (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659-1673.
47. Lydeard, C., Clark, S.A., Perez, K.E., Cowie, R.H., Ponder, W.F., Bogan, A.E., Bouchet, P., Gargominy, O., Cummings, K.S., Frest, T.J., Herbert, D.G., Hershler, R., Roth, B., Seddon, M., Strong, E.E. & Thompson, F.G. (2004) The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. BioScience, 54, 321-330.
48. McKinney, M.L. & Lockwood, J.L. (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 450-453.
49. McMahon, R.F. & Bogan, A.E. (2001) Mollusca: Bivalvia. Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates (ed. by J.H. Thorp and A.P. Covich), pp. 331-430. Academic Press Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
50. McRae, S.E., Allan, J.D. & Burch, J.B. (2004) Reach- and catchment-scale determinants of the distribution of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in south-eastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology, 49, 127-142.
51. Milly, P.C.D., Dunne, K.A. & Vecchia, A.V. (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature, 438, 347-350.
52. Morris, T.D. & Corkum, L.D. (1996) Assemblage, structure of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in rivers with grassy and forested riparan zones. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15, 576-586.
53. Naiman, R.J. & Turner, M.G. (2000) A future perspective on North America's freshwater ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 10, 958-970.
54. NatureServe (2009) NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life. Available at: (accessed 14 May 2009).
55. Neck, R.W. (1982) Preliminary analysis of the ecological zoogeography of the freshwater mussels of Texas. Symposium on recent benthological investigations in Texas and adjacent states (ed. by J.R. Davis), pp. 33-42. Texas Academy of Sciences, Austin, TX, USA.
56. Neck, R.W. (1984) Restricted and declining nonmarine molluscs of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, TX, USA.
57. Newton, T.J., Woolnough, D.A. & Strayer, D.L. (2008) Using landscape ecology to understand and manage freshwater mussel populations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 27, 424-439.
58. Oesch, R. (1995) Missouri Naiades: a guide to the mussels of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
59. Palmer, M.A. (1997) Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in freshwater sediments. AMBIO, 26, 571-577.
60. Parmalee, P.W. & Bogan, A.E. (1998) The freshwater mussels of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN, USA.
61. Poff, N.L., Olden, J.D., Merritt, D.M. & Pepin, D.M. (2007) Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 5732-5737.
62. Régnier, C., Fontaine, B. & Bouchet, P. (2009) Not knowing, not recording, not listing: numerous unnoticed mollusk extinctions. Conservation Biology, 23, 1214-1221.
63. van der Schalie, H. (1945) The value of mussel distribution in tracing stream confluence. Papers. Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, 30, 355-373.
64. Schwartz, M.W., Thorne, J.H. & Viers, J.H. (2006) Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. Biological Conservation, 187, 282-291.
65. Sepkoski, J.J. Jr & Rex, M.A. (1974) Distribution of freshwater mussels: coastal rivers as biogeographic islands. Systematic Zoology, 23, 165-188.
66. Stallings, C.D. (2009) Fishery-independent data reveal negative effect of human population density on caribbean predatory fish communities. PLoS ONE, 4, e5333.
67. Stansbery, D.H. (1971) Rare and endangered mollusks in eastern United States. Proceedings of a Symposium on Rare and Endangered Mollusks (Naiads) of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife (ed. by S.E. Jorgensen and R.W. Sharpe), pp. 5-18. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
68. Stein, B.A. (2002) States of the union: ranking America's biodiversity. NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA.
69. Strayer, D. (1983) The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology, 13, 253-264.
70. Strayer, D.L. (1999) Statistical power of presence-absence data to detect population declines. Conservation Biology, 13, 1034-1038.
71. Strayer, D.L. (2008) Freshwater mussel ecology: a multifactor approach to distribution and abundance. University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles, CA, USA.
72. Strayer, D.L. & Dudgeon, D. (2010) Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29, 344-358.
73. Strayer, D.L. & Jirka, K.J. (1997) The pearly mussels of New York state. The New York State Education Department, Albany, NY, USA.
74. Strayer, D.L., Claypool, S. & Sprague, S.J. (1997) Assessing unionid populations with quadrats and timed searches. Conservation and Managenment of Freshwater Mussels II (Initiatives for future): Proceedings of an Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee (UMRCC) Symposium (ed. by K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer and T.J. Naimo), pp. 163-169. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, IL, USA.
75. Strayer, D.L., Downing, J.A., Haag, W.R., King, T.L., Layzer, J.B., Newton, T.J. & Nichols, S.J. (2004) Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America's most imperiled animals. BioScience, 54, 429-439.
76. Strecker, J.K. (1931) The distribution of the Naiades or pearly fresh-water mussels of Texas. Baylor University Museum, Baylor, TX, USA.
77. Texas Register 35, (2010) Threatened and endangered nongame species. Chapter 65. Wildlife Subchapter G. 31 TAC §65.175. Adopted rules. Texas Register 35, January 8, 2010: 249-251. Texas Secretary of State. Available at.
78. Thompson, J. (2006) Society's choices: land use changes, forest fragmentation, and conservation. Science Findings. Pacific Northwest Research Station, 88, 1-5. Available at: (accessed 24 August 2010).
79. Tilman, D., May, R.M., Lehman, C.L. & Nowak, M.A. (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65-66.
80. TPWD (2010) Land and water resources conservation and recreation plan. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, TX, USA. PWD PL E0100-867 (1/10).
81. Troia, M. & Ford, N. (in press) Notes on the southern hickorynut (Obovaria jacksoniana) in the upper Neches River in east Texas. Texas Journal of Science.
82. Ugland, K.I., Gray, J.S. & Ellingsen, K.E. (2003) The species-accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 888-897.
83. Underwood, E.C., Viers, J.H., Klausmeyer, K.R., Cox, R.L. & Shaw, M.R. (2009) Threats and biodiversity in the mediterranean biome. Diversity & Distributions, 15, 188-197.
84. USDA (2008) USDA urban forest data for Texas. Available at: (accessed 24 August 2010).
85. USDA (2010) USDA economic research service. Available at: (accessed 24 August 2010).
86. USFWS (2010) Species reports for Texas. Available at: (accessed 20 January 2010).
87. Vaughn, C.C., Taylor, C.M. & Eberhard, K.J. (1997) A comparison of the effectiveness of timed searches vs. quadrat sampling in mussel surveys. Proceedings of an Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee (UMRCC) symposium, 16-18 October 1995 (ed by K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer and T.J. Naim), pp. 157-162. St. Louis, MO, USA.
88. Watters, T.G. (2000) Freshwater mussels and water quality: a review of the effects of hydrologic and instream habitat alterations. Proceedings of the first freshwater mollusk concervation society symposium (ed by P.D. Johnson and R.S. Butler), pp. 261-274. Ohio Biological Survey.
89. White, E.M., Alig, R.J., Stein, S.M., Mahal, L.G. & Theobald, D.M. (2009) A sensitivity analysis of 'Forests on the Edge: Housing Development on America's Private Forests', p. 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon.
90. Whittaker, R.J., Araújo, M.B., Paul, J., Ladle, R.J., Watson, J.E.M. & Willis, K.J. (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity & Distributions, 11, 3-23.
91. Williams, J.D., Warren, M.L. Jr, Cummings, K.S., Harris, J.L. & Neves, R.J. (1993) Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries, 18, 6-22.
92. Wong, C.M., Williams, C.E., Pittock, J., Collier, U. & Schelle, P. (2007) World's top 10 rivers at risk. Executive summary. WWF International, Gland, Switzerland.
93. Woodward, G., Perkins, D.M. & Brown, L.E. (2010) Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365, 2093-2106.