Reduced mortality with noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of shock

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 224.e1-224.e8

  Hata, J Steven ^a   Stotts, Corey ^b   Shelsky, Constance ^a   Bayman, Emine O ^a   Frazier, Anita ^a   Wang, Jenny ^a   Nickel, Ellen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Outcomes research; Pulmonary artery catheterization; Resuscitation; Shock

Indexed keywords

VASOACTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG ARTERY CATHETER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PULSE WAVE; SHOCK; SURVIVAL TIME;

EID: 79953780976     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Shah M.R., Hasselblad V., Stevenson L.W., et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically Ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2005, 294:1664-1670.
2. Richard C., Warszawski J., Anguel N., et al. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003, 290:2713-2720.
3. Harvey S., Harrison D.A., Singer M., et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366:472-477.
4. DePietro M., Esposito C., Eichacker P.Q. Complications of pulmonary artery catheterization. Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring 1998, 855-870. McGraw-Hill, New York. M.J. Tobin (Ed.).
5. Osman D., Ridel C., Ray P., et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:64-68.
6. Michard F., Teboul J.L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2009.
7. Raper R., Sibbald W.J. Misled by the wedge? the Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 1986, 89:427-434.
8. Pearse R.M., Ikram K., Barry J. Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output. Crit Care 2004, 8(3):190-195. [Epub 2004 May 5].
9. Compton F., Schafer J.H. Noninvasive cardiac output determination: broadening the applicability of hemodynamic monitoring. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009, 13:44-55.
10. Michard F., Boussat S., Chemla D., et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162(1):134-138.
11. Costa M.G., Della Rocca G., Chiarandini P., et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:257-263.
12. Tavernier B., Makhotine O., Lebuffe G., et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1313-1321.
13. Uchino S., Bellomo R., Morimatsu H., et al. Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care 2006, 10:R174.
14. Pearse R., Dawson D., Fawcett J., et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005, 9:R687-R693.
15. Dowdy D.W., Needham D.M., Mendez-Tellez P.A., et al. Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: the role of the cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:914-921.
16. Rothman K.J., Greenland S., Lash T.J. Design strategies to improve study accuracy. Modern epidemiology 2008, 168-182. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia. K.J. Rothman (Ed.).
17. de Wilde R.B., Schreuder J.J., van den Berg P.C., et al. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:760-768.
18. Della Rocca G., Costa M.G., Pompei L., et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002, 88:350-356.
19. Romano P.S., Chan B.K. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool?. Health Serv Res 2000, 34(7):1469-1489.
20. Nante N., De Marco M.F., Balzi D., et al. Prediction of mortality for congestive heart failure patients: results from different wards of an Italian teaching hospital. Eur J Epidemiol 2000, 16:1017-1021.
21. Averill R.F., Goldfield N., Hughes J.S., et al. All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups (APR-DRGs): methodology overview 2003, 1-91. 3M Health Information Systems, Wallingford (Conn).
22. Tabib A. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:1303-1310.
23. Harvey S., Young D., Brampton W., et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003408 2006.
24. Wheeler A.P., Bernard G.R., Thompson B.T., et al. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:2213-2224.
25. Iberti T.J., Fischer E.P., Leibowitz A.B., et al. A multicenter study of physicians' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group. JAMA 1990, 264:2928-2932.
26. Karimova A., Pinsky D.J. The endothelial response to oxygen deprivation: biology and clinical implications. Intensive Care Med 2001, 27:19-31.
27. Rivers E., Nguyen B., Havstad S., et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1368-1377.