Using numerical data in explicitly interpretive, contextual inquiry: A “practical discourse” framework and examples from Engeström—s research on activity systems

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 179-199

  Yanchar, Stephen C ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

activity theory; practical discourse; qualitative methods; quantitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953771294     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354310393777     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bensimon, E.M., Polkinghorne, D.E., Bauman, G.L., & Vallejo, E. (2004). Doing research that makes a difference. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 104-126.
2. Danziger, K. (1990). Deconstructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Davidson, D. (1984). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 183-198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Heidegger's hermeneutic realism. In D.R. Hiley, J.F. Bohman, & R. Shusterman (Eds.), The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture (pp. 25-41). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243-259.
7. Engeström, Y. (1996). The tensions of judging: Handling cases of driving under the influence of alcohol in Finland and California. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 199-232). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
9. Engeström, Y., & Engeström, R. (1984). Siivoustyön hallinta ja siivoojien ladullinen koulutustarve [The mastery of cleaning work and the cleaners qualitative need for training]. Helsinki, Finland: ServiSystems.
10. Engeström, Y., & Engeström, R. (1986). Developmental work research: The approach and an application in cleaning work. Nordisk Pedagogik, 6, 2-15.
11. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle-school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211-224). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Engeström, Y., Hakkarainen, P., & Hedegaard, M. (1984). On the methodological basis of research in teaching and learning. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Learning and teaching on a scientific basis (pp. 119-183). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitat Psykologisk Institut.
13. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamåki, R.L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Ethnography: Step by step (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Fleming, V., Gaidys, U., & Robb, Y. (2003). Hermeneutic research in nursing: Developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry, 10, 113-120.
16. Gadamer, H.G. (1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans., 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
17. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
19. Heller, F. (2004). Action research and research action: A family of methods. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 349-360). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21. Hornstein, G.A. (1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas, and implications. In J.G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 1-34). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Laming, D. (1997). A critique of a measurement-theoretic critique: Commentary on Michell, quantitative science, and the definition of measurement in psychology. The British Journal of Psychology, 88, 398-391.
23. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Martin, J. (2003). Positivism, quantification, and the phenomena of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 33-38.
25. Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naïve realism, and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 5-31.
27. Pike, K.L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (2ndrev. ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
28. Slife, B.D., & Williams, R.N. (1995). What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Smith, J.A., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1995). Rethinking methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Stam, H.J. (2006). Pythagoreanism, meaning, and the appeal to number. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(3), 240-251.
31. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
34. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Wertsch, J.V. (Ed.). (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
36. Westerman, M.A. (2006). Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: The mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive quantitative investigations. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(3), 189-211.
37. Williams, R.N. (1990). The metaphysic of things and discourse about them. In J.E. Faulconer & R.N. Williams (Eds.), Reconsidering psychology: Perspectives from continental philosophy (pp. 136-150). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
38. Yanchar, S.C. (2006). On the possibility of contextual-quantitative inquiry. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(3), 212-228.
39. Yanchar, S.C., & Williams, D.D. (2006). Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for method use. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 3-12.