A comparison of Harris and oxford hip scores for assessing outcome after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: Can the patient tell us everything we need to know?

HIP International

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 453-459

  Parsons, Nick R ^a   de Souza, Ruth Mary ^b   Oni, Tofunmi ^b   Achten, Juul ^a   Krikler, Stephen J ^b   Costa, Mattew L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Correlation analysis; Harris hip score; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Oxford hip score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP LIFETIME; HIP PAIN; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OXFORD HIP SCORE; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REOPERATION; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953763718     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070001002000407     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51: 737-55.
2. Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. The Harriship score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty 2001; 5: 575-80.
3. Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 384: 189-97.
4. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess patients' perceptions in relation to total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 185-90.
5. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement sur-gery. Qual Health Care 1996; 5: 81-8.
6. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 1125-9.
7. Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E et al. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 801-8.
8. Field RE, Cronin MD, Singh PJ. The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 618-22.
9. Delaunay C, Epinette JA, Dawson J, Murray D, Jolles BM. Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol 2009; 95; 89-99.
10. Naal FD, Sieverding M, Impellizzeri FM, von Knoch F, Mannion AF, Leunig M. Reliability and validity of the cross-cul-turally adapted German Oxford hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 952-7.
11. Wylde V, Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 66.
12. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogen T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 228-41.
13. Tegner Y, Lysolm J. Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 198: 43-9.
14. Andrew JG, Palan J, Kurup HV, Gibson P, Murray DW, Beard DJ. Obesity in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 424-9.
15. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthropla- sties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 1037-41.
16. Dickinson HO, Hrisos S, Eccles MP, Francis J, Johnston M. Statistical considerations in a systematic review of proxy measures of clinical behaviour. Implementation Science 2010; 5: 20.