Competitive and allelopathic interference between soybean crop and annual wormwood (Artemisia annua L.) under field conditions

European Journal of Agronomy

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 211-221

  Morvillo, C M ^a,b   De la Fuente, E B ^a   Gil, A ^a   Martinez Ghersa M A ^a   Gonzalez Andujar J L ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b INSTITUTO DE AGRICULTURA SOSTENIBLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Allelochemicals; Crop weed interaction; Glycine max; Nodule biomass; Yield

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ALLELOCHEMICAL; ALLELOPATHY; BACTERIUM; CROP YIELD; DICOTYLEDON; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FIELDWORK; FLOWERING; GLYPHOSATE; GROWTH RATE; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; INTERFERENCE COMPETITION; NITROGEN FIXATION; NODULATION; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; PHYTOMASS; SOIL MICROORGANISM; SOYBEAN; SYMBIONT; YIELD RESPONSE;

ARTEMISIA; ARTEMISIA ANNUA; BRADYRHIZOBIUM JAPONICUM; GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 79953750827     PISSN: 11610301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aldrich R.J. Weed Crop Ecology: Principles in Weed Management 1984, Breton publishers, USA.
2. Azania A.A.P.M., Azania C.A.M., Alves P.L.C.A., Palaniraj R., Kadian H.S., Sati S.C., Rawat L.S., Dahiya D.S., Narwal S.S. Allelopathic plants. 7. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Allelopathy J. 2003, 11:1-20.
3. Barney J.N., Hay A.G., Weston L.A. Isolation and characterization of allelopathic volatiles from mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris). J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31:247-265.
4. Batish R.D., Lavanya K., Singh H.P., Kohli R.K. Phenolic allelochemicals released by Chenopodium murale affect the growth, nodulation and macromolecule content in chickpea and pea. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 51:119-128.
5. Blanco J.A. The representation of allelopathy in ecosystem-level forest models. Ecol. Modell. 2007, 209:65-77.
6. Callaway R.M. Facilitative and interfering effects of Arthrocnemum Subterminale on winter annuals. Ecology 1994, 75:681-686.
7. Callaway R.M. Positive interactions among plants. Bot. Rev. 1995, 61:306-349.
8. Callaway R.M. The detection of neighbors by plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:104-105.
9. Canner S.R., Wiles L.J., McMaster G.S. Weed reproduction model parameters may be estimated from crop yield loss data. Weed Sci. 2002, 50:763-772.
10. Chen P., Leather G.R. Plant growth regulatory activities of artemisinin and its related compounds. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16:1867-1876.
11. Cousens R. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 1991, 5:664-673.
12. de la Fuente E.B., Suárez S.A., Ghersa C.M., Leon R.J.C. Soybean weed communities: relationships with cultural history and crop yield. Agron. J. 1999, 91:234-241.
13. de la Fuente E.B., Suárez S.A., Ghersa C.M. Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 115:229-236.
14. de la Fuente E.B., Perelman S., Ghersa C.M. Weed and arthropod communities in soyabean as related to crop productivity and land use in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. Weed Res. 2010, 50:561-571.
15. de Wit C.T. On competition. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz. 1960, 66:1-82.
16. Delabays N., Simonnet X., Gaudin M. The genetics of artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L. and the breeding of high yielding cultivars. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8:1795-1801.
17. Duke S.O., Vaughn K.C., Croom E.M., Elsohly N.H. Artemisinin, a constituent of annual wormwood (Artemisia annua), is a selective phytotoxin. Weed Sci. 1987, 35:499-505.
18. Einhellig F.A. Interactions involving allelopathy in cropping systems. Agron. J. 1996, 88:886-893.
19. Einhellig F.A. An integrated view of allelochemicals and multiple stresses. Principles and practices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical Interactions 1999, 479-494. CRC Press. Inderjit, K.M.M. Dakshini, C.L. Foy (Eds.).
20. Facelli J.M., Pickett S.T.A. Plant litter: light interception and effects on an old-field plant community. Ecology 1991, 72:24-1031.
21. Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E. Stages of soybean development. Special Report 80 1977, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
22. Harborne J.B. Biochemical plant ecology. Plant Biochemistry 1997, 503-516. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. P.M. Dey, J.B. Harborne (Eds.).
23. Hernandez A., Garcia-Plazzola J.I., Becerril J.M. Glyphosate effects on phenolic metabolism of nodulated soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47:2920-2925.
24. Inderjit, Weiner J. Plant allelochemical interference or soil chemical ecology?. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2001, 4:3-12.
25. Inderjit, Kaur M., Foy C.L. On significance of fields studies in allelopathy. Weed Technol. 2001, 15:792-797.
26. Inderjit, Mallik A.U. Can Kalmia angustifolia interference to black spruce (Picea mariana) be explained by allelopathy?. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2002, 160:75-84.
27. Inderjit, Callaway R.M. Experimental designs for the study of allelopathy. Plant Soil 2003, 256:1-11.
28. Inderjit, Nilsen E.T. Bioassays and field studies for allelopathy in terrestrial plants: progress and problems. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22:221-238.
29. Inderjit Soil microorganisms: an important determinant of allelopathic activity. Plant Soil 2005, 274:227-236.
30. Lau J.A., Puliafico K.P., Kopshever J.A., Steltzer H., Jarvis E.P., Schwarzländer M., Hufbauner R.A. Inference of allelopathy is complicated by effects of activated carbon on plant growth. New Phytol. 2008, 178:412-423.
31. Lydon J., Teasdale J.R., Chen P.K. Allelopathic activity of annual wormwood (Artemisia annua) and the role of artemisinin. Weed Sci. 1997, 45:807-811.
32. Mahall B.E., Callaway R.M. Root communication among desert shrubs. Ecology 1991, 88:874-876.
33. Molish H. Der einfluss einer pflanze auf die andere-Allelopathie 1937, Fischer, Jena.
34. Moorman T.B., Becerril J.M., Lydon L., Duke S.O. Production of hydroxybenzoic acids by Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains after treatment with glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 1002(40):289-293.
35. Nilsson M.C. Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empethum hermaphroditum Hagerup. Oecologia 1994, 98:1-7.
36. Oreja F.H., Gonzalez-Andujar J.L. Modelling competition between large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and glyphosate-resistant soybean in the Rolling Pampas of Argentina. Commun. Biom. Crop Sci. 2007, 2:62-67.
37. Park S.E., Laurence R.B., Watkinson A.R. The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92:741-748.
38. Qian G.P., Yang Y.-W., Ren Q.-L. Determination of artemisinin in Artemisia annua L. by reversed phase HPLC. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2005, 28:705-712.
39. Reddy K.N. Effect of glyphosate on growth, chlorophyll content and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant soybeans (Glycine max) varieties. J. New Seeds 2000, 2:37-52.
40. Rice E.L. Allelopathy 1984, Academic Press, New York, Orlando, USA.
41. Ridenour W.M., Callaway R.M. The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 2001, 126:444-450.
42. Ryan M.R., Smith R.G., Mortensen D.A., Teasdale J.R., Curran W.S., Seidel R., Shumways D.L. Weed crop competition relationships differ between organic and conventional cropping systems. Weed Res. 2009, 49:572-580.
43. Seigler D.S. Chemistry and mechanisms of allelopathic interactions. Agron. J. 1996, 88:876-885.
44. Sinkkonen A. Density-dependent chemical interference-an extension of the biological response model. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27:1513-1523.
45. USDA Keys of Soil Taxonomy 1999, Pocahontas.Press, Blacksburg, VA. 8th ed.
46. Vila-Aiub M.M., Ghersa C.M. Building up resistance by recurrently exposing target plants to sublethal doses of herbicide. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22:195-207.
47. Wardle D.A., Nicholson K.S., Ahmed K.S., Rahman A. Interference effects of the invasive plant Carduus nutans L. against the nitrogen fixation ability of Trifolium repens L. Plant Soil 1994, 163:287-297.
48. Weidenhamer J., Hartnett D., Romeo J. Density-dependent phytotoxicity: distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants. J. Appl. Ecol. 1989, 26:613-624.
49. Weston L.A. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 1996, 88:860-866.
50. Weston L.A., Duke S.O. Weed and crop allelopathy. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22:367-389.
51. Wurst S., Van Beersum S. The impact of soil organism composition and activated carbon on grass-legume competition. Plant Soil 2009, 314:1-9.
52. Zablotowics R.M., Reddy K.N. Impact of glyphosate on the Bradyrhizobium japonicum symbiosis with glyphosate-resistant transgenic soybean: a minireview. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33:825-831.