A pilot study of the epidemiology and associations of pulse pressure variation in cardiac surgery patients

Critical Care and Resuscitation

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 17-23

  Kim, In Byung ^a   Bellomo, Rinaldo ^b   Fealy, Nigel ^b   Baldwin, Ian ^b  

^a Catholic Kwandong University   (South Korea)

^b AUSTIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APACHE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HEART VALVE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE RATE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; APACHE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEART VALVES; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULSE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79953749129     PISSN: 14412772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7.
2. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-8.
3. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-28.
4. Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 487-97.
5. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8.
6. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 782-8.
7. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 64-8.
8. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126: 1563-8.
9. Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, et al. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1511-7.
10. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23.
11. Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 678-84.
12. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 513-7.
13. Aboy M, Crespo C, Austin D. An enhanced automatic algorithm for estimation of respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure during regions of abrupt hemodynamic changes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009; 56: 2537-45.
14. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, et al. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008; 12: R82.
15. Aboy M, McNames J, Thong T, et al. A novel algorithm to estimate the pulse pressure variation index deltaPP. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51: 2198-203.
16. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8.
17. Auler JO Jr, Galas F, Hajjar L, et al. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1201-6.
18. Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, et al. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 407-13.
19. Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E, et al. Influence of systolicpressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 194-9.
20. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11: R100.
21. Haase M, Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R, et al. Sodium bicarbonate to prevent increases in serum creatinine after cardiac surgery: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 39-47.