Optimal detection strategies for an established invasive pest

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1129-1138

  Homans, Frances ^a   Horie, Tetsuya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Detection; Invasive species; Management over space

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DETECTION METHOD; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; INVASIVE SPECIES; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PEST CONTROL; POPULATION MODELING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SUBPOPULATION;

EID: 79953747748     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ameden H.A., Cash S.B., Zilberman D. Border enforcement and firm response in the management of invasive species. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2007, 39:35-46. (October).
2. BenDor T.K., Metcalf S.S., Fontenot L.E., Sangunett B., Hannon B. Modeling the spread of the Emerald Ash Borer. Ecol. Model. 2006, 197(1):221-236.
3. Blackwood J., Hastings A., Costello C. Cost-effective management of invasive species using linear-quadratic control. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:519-527.
4. Bogich T.L., Liebhold A.M., Shea K. To sample or eradicate? A cost minimization model for monitoring and managing an invasive species. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:1134-1142.
5. Bossenbroek J.M., Kraft C.E., Nekola J.C. Prediction of long-distance dispersal using gravity models: zebra mussel invasion of inland lakes. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11(6):1778-1788.
6. Bossenbroek J.M., Johnson L.E., Peters B., Lodge D.M. Forecasting the expansion of Zebra Mussels in the United States. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21(3):800-810.
7. Buchan L.A.J., Padilla D.K. Estimating the probability of long-distance overland dispersal of invading aquatic species. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9(1):254-265.
8. Buchan L.A.J., Padilla D.K. Predicting the likelihood of Eurasian watermilfoil presence in lakes, a macrophyte monitoring tool. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10(5):1442-1455.
9. Burnett K.M., Kaiser B.A., Roumasset J.A. Invasive species control over space and time: Miconia calvescens on Oahu, Hawaii. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2007, 39:125-132. (October).
10. Clinton W.J. Executive Order 13112. Fed. Regist. 1999, 64:6183-6185.
11. Costello C., McAusland C. Protectionism, trade, and measures of damage from exotic species introductions. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2003, 85(4):964-975.
12. Costello C., Springborn M., McAusland C., Solow A. Unintended biological invasions: does risk vary by trading partner?. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2007, 54(3):262-276.
13. Crooks J.A. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 2005, 12(3):316-329.
14. Eiswerth M.E., Johnson W.S. Managing nonindigenous invasive species: insights from dynamic analysis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2002, 23(3):319-342.
15. Epanchin-Niell R.S., Wilen J.E. Optimal control of spatial-dynamic processes: the case of biological invasions. Selected Paper, Agricultural & Applied Economics Association annual meeting 2010.
16. Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds (FICMNEW) A National Early Detection and Rapid Response System for Invasive Plants in the United States: Conceptual Design 2003, 24pp.
17. Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division, Michigan DNR Michigan Forest Health Highlights 2007, 20pp.
18. Hastings A., Cuddington K., Davies K.F., Dugaw C.J., Elmendorf S., Freestone A., Harrison S., Holland M., Lambrinos J., Malvadkar U., Melbourne B.A., Moore K., Taylor C., Thomson D. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8(1):91-101.
19. Higgins S., Richardson D., Cowling R. Using a dynamic landscape model for planning the management of alien plant invasions. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10:1833-1848.
20. Hof J. Optimizing spatial and dynamic population-based control strategies for invading forest pests. Nat. Res. Model. 1998, 11(3):197-216.
21. Horan R.D. Biological pollution prevention strategies under ignorance: the case of invasive species. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2002, 84(5):1303-1310.
22. Isaacson R.T., Allen K. Plant Information Online 2007, Regents of the University of Minnesota.
23. Kot M., Lewis M.A., Driessche P.V.D. Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 1996, 77:2027-2042.
24. Leung B., Lodge D.M., Finnoff D., Shogren J.F., Lewis M.A., Lamberti G. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. R. Soc. R. Soc. B 2002, 269(1508):2407-2413.
25. Liebhold A.M., Halversen J.A., Elmes G.A. Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis. J. Biogeogr. 1992, 19(5):513-520.
26. Mayo J.H., Straka T.J., Leonard D.S. The cost of slowing the spread of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2003, 96(5):1448-1454.
27. Mehta S.V., Haight R.G., Homans F.R., Polasky S., Venette R.C. Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61(2-3):237-245.
28. Menz K.M., Coote B.G., Auld B.A. Spatial aspect of weed control. Agric. Syst. 1980, 6:67-75.
29. Moody M.E., Mack R.N. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 1988, 25:1009-1021.
30. Neubert M.G., Kot M., Lewis M.A. Invasion speeds in fluctuating environments. Proc. R. Soc. R. Soc. B 2000, 267(1453):1603-1610.
31. Olson L.J., Roy S. Controlling a biological invasion: a non-classical dynamic economic model. Econ. Theor. 2008, 36(3):453-469.
32. Oude Lansink A.G.J.M. New Approaches to the Economics of Plant Health 2007, Springer, Dordrecht.
33. Peters W., Meyer M., Anderson N. Minnesota horticultural industry survey on invasive plants. Euphytica 2006, 148(1-2):75-86.
34. Petrice T.R., Haack R.A. Effects of cutting date, outdoor storage conditions, and splitting on survival of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in firewood logs. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99(3):790-796.
35. Poland T.M., McCullough D.G. Emerald Ash Borer: invasion of the urban forest and threat to North America's ash resource. J. Forest. 2006, 104(3):118-124.
36. Settle C., Shogren J.F. Modeling native-exotic species within Yellowstone Lake. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2002, 84(5):1323-1328.
37. Sharov A.A., Colbert J.J. A model for testing hypotheses of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L., population dynamics. Ecol. Model. 1996, 84(1-3):31-51.
38. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A.M. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol. Appl. 1998, 8:833-845.
39. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A.M., Roberts E.A. Optimizing the use of barrier zones to slow the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America. J. Econ. Entomol. 1998, 91(1):165-174.
40. Shigesada N., Kawasaki K. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
41. Taylor C.M., Hastings A. Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density-structured model for Spartina alterniflora. J. Appl. Ecol. 2004, 41:1049-1057.
42. Timar L., Phaneuf D.J. Modeling the human-induced spread of an aquatic invasive: the case of the zebra mussel. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(12):3060-3071.
43. Weinberger H.F. Long-time behavior of a class of biological models. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1982, 13(3):353-396.
44. Whittle A.J., Lenhart S., Gross L.J. Optimal control for management of an invasive plant species. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2007, 4:101-112.
45. Wilen J.E. Economics of spatial-dynamic processes. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2007, 89(5):1134-1144.
46. Wolfram S. The Mathematica Book 1999, Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press, Champaign/Cambridge. 4th ed.