-
1
-
-
48849085621
-
Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies:Theory and empirical tests
-
Ajjan, H. and Hartshorne, R. (2008), “Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests”, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 71-80.
-
(2008)
The Internet and Higher Education
, vol.11
, Issue.2
, pp. 71-80
-
-
Ajjan, H.1
Hartshorne, R.2
-
3
-
-
33745060768
-
-
2005 Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning, EDUCAUSE, Boulder, CO
-
Caruso, J.B. and Kvavik, R.B. (2005), “ECAR study of students and information technology”, 2005 Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning, EDUCAUSE, Boulder, CO.
-
(2005)
ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology
-
-
Caruso, J.B.1
Kvavik, R.B.2
-
4
-
-
47949111685
-
-
EDUCAUSE, Boulder, CO
-
Caruso, J.B. and Salaway, G. (2008), The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, EDUCAUSE, Boulder, CO.
-
(2008)
Theecarstudyofundergraduatestudentsand Information Technology
-
-
Caruso, J.B.1
Salaway, G.2
-
5
-
-
84892394552
-
-
comScore, Inc, (accessed 09 October 2009)
-
comScore (2009), “Online usage in Malaysia”, comScore, Inc, available at: www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/8/Maybank_Leads_as_the_Most_Visited_Local_Site_in_Malaysia (accessed 09 October 2009).
-
(2009)
Online Usage in Malaysia
-
-
-
6
-
-
55249087535
-
Perceivedusefulness,perceivedeaseof use,and useracceptance of information technology
-
Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
-
(1989)
MIS Quarterly
, vol.13
, Issue.3
, pp. 319-340
-
-
Davis, F.D.1
-
7
-
-
84940109649
-
-
(accessed 11 September 2009)
-
GreyReview (2008), “Social media marketing and Malaysia’s biggest brands”, available at: www.greyreview.com/2008/10/20/social-media-marketing-and-malaysias-biggest-brands/ (accessed 11 September 2009).
-
(2008)
Social Media Marketing and Malaysias Biggest brands”
-
-
-
8
-
-
84871000801
-
The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings
-
Atkinson, R., Mcbeath, C., Kit, A.S.S. and Cheers, C
-
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K.L., Bishop, A. and Chang, R. (2007), “The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: preliminary findings”, in Atkinson, R., Mcbeath, C., Kit, A.S.S. and Cheers, C. (Eds), Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007, pp. 517-25.
-
(2007)
Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore
, vol.2007
, pp. 517-525
-
-
Kennedy, G.1
Dalgarno, B.2
Gray, K.3
Judd, T.4
Waycott, J.5
Bennett, S.6
Maton, K.7
Krause, K.L.8
Bishop, A.9
Chang, R.10
-
9
-
-
43649099425
-
First year studentsexperiences with technology: Are they really digital natives”
-
Kennedy, G.E., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A., Gray, K. and Krause, K.L. (2008), “First year students’ experiences with technology: are they really digital natives”, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 108-22.
-
(2008)
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
, vol.24
, Issue.1
, pp. 108-122
-
-
Kennedy, G.E.1
Judd, T.S.2
Churchward, A.3
Gray, K.4
Krause, K.L.5
-
10
-
-
34249655989
-
-
Washington, DC, (accessed 2 July 2008)
-
Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. (2005), Teen Content Creators and Consumers, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC, available at: www.pewinternet.org/media/Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Teens_Content_Creation.pdf (accessed 2 July 2008).
-
(2005)
Teen Content Creators and Consumers, Pew Internet Andamerican Life Project
-
-
Lenhart, A.1
Madden, M.2
-
11
-
-
77956189060
-
“Are digital natives a myth or reality?
-
(accessed 4 June2009)
-
Margaryan, A. and Littlejohn, A. (2008), “Are digital natives a myth or reality?: Students’ use of technologies for learning”, available at: www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/anoush/documents/DigitalNativesMythOrReality-MargaryanAndLittlejohn-draft-111208.pdf (accessed 4 June 2009).
-
(2008)
Students’ Use of technologiesforlearning”
-
-
Margaryan, A.1
Littlejohn, A.2
-
12
-
-
73449149291
-
Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions ofadopting an information technology innovation
-
Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1991), “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, p. 192.
-
(1991)
Information Systems Research
, vol.2
, Issue.3
, pp. 192
-
-
Moore, G.C.1
Benbasat, I.2
-
13
-
-
38149142177
-
Participation inequality: Encouragingmore users to contribute
-
(accessed 13 August 2009)
-
Nielsen, J. (2006), “Participation inequality: encouraging more users to contribute”, Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox: Participation Inequality in Social Design, available at: www.useit.com/aletbox/participation_inequality.html (accessed 13 August 2009).
-
(2006)
Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox: Participation Inequality in Social Design
-
-
Nielsen, J.1
-
14
-
-
73549120882
-
Understanding information technology usage: A test ofcompeting models
-
Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995), “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, p. 144.
-
(1995)
Information Systems Research
, vol.6
, Issue.2
, pp. 144
-
-
Taylor, S.1
Todd, P.A.2
-
15
-
-
1542382496
-
User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view
-
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 425-78.
-
(2003)
MIS Quarterly
, vol.27
, Issue.3
, pp. 425-478
-
-
Venkatesh, V.1
Morris, M.G.2
Davis, G.B.3
Davis, F.D.4
|