Mathematically gifted adolescents have deficiencies in social valuation and mentalization

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Yun, Kyongsik ^a,b   Chung, Dongil ^b   Jang, Bosun ^b   Kim, Jin Ho ^b   Jeong, Jaeseung ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; GAME; GIFTED CHILD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; NORMAL HUMAN; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THEORY OF MIND;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD, GIFTED; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAME THEORY; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL VALUES; THEORY OF MIND;

EID: 79953720578     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018224     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gill H, O'Boyle M, Hathaway J, (1998) Cortical distribution of neural activity for component processes in mental rotation. Cortex 34: 707-718.
2. O'Boyle MW, Cunnington R, Silk TJ, Vaughan D, Jackson G, et al. (2005) Mathematically gifted male adolescents activate a unique brain network during mental rotation. Cognitive Brain Research 25: 583-587.
3. Rogers KB, (1986) Do the Gifted Think and Learn Differently? A Review of Recent Research and Its Implications for Instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 10: 17-39.
4. Geary DC, Brown SC, (1991) Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology 27: 398-406.
5. Gaultney JF, Bjorklund DF, Goldstein D, (1996) To be young, gifted, and strategic: Advantages for memory performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 61: 43-66.
6. Jin SH, Kim SY, Park KH, Lee KJ, (2007) Differences in EEG between gifted and average students: neural complexity and functional cluster analysis. International Journal of Neuroscience 117: 1167-1184.
7. Singh H, O'Boyle MW, (2004) Interhemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students. Neuropsychology-New York 18: 371-377.
8. Gross MUM, (2004) Exceptionally gifted children. London Routledge.
9. Lovecky DV, (1992) Exploring Social and Emotional Aspects of Giftedness in Children. Roeper Review 15: 18-25.
10. Neihart M, Reis SM, Robinson NM, Moon SM, (2002) The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What Do We Know? Austin, TX Prufrock Press, Inc.
11. Janos PM, Robinson NM, (1985) Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In: Horowitz FD, O'Brien M, editors. The gifted and talented: developmental perspectives Washington, DC American Psychological Association pp. 149-195.
12. Robinson A, Clinkenbeard PR, (1998) Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 117-139.
13. Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B, (1982) An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367-388.
14. Oosterbeek H, Sloof R, Van De Kuilen G, (2004) Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7: 171-188.
15. Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD, (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300: 1755-1758.
16. van't Wout M, Kahn RS, Sanfey AG, Aleman A, (2006) Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Experimental Brain Research 169: 564-568.
17. Xiao E, Houser D, (2005) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 7398-7401.
18. Rilling JK, Sanfey AG, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD, (2004) The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. Neuroimage 22: 1694-1703.
19. Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E, (2006) Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex. Science 314: 829.
20. Koenigs M, Tranel D, (2007) Irrational Economic Decision-Making after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 951.
21. Lee KH, Choi YY, Gray JR, Cho SH, Chae JH, et al. (2006) Neural correlates of superior intelligence: stronger recruitment of posterior parietal cortex. Neuroimage 29: 578-586.
22. Jausovec N, (1996) Differences in EEG alpha activity related to giftedness. Intelligence 23: 159-173.
23. Alexander JE, O'Boyle MW, Benbow CP, (1996) Developmentally advanced EEG alpha power in gifted male and female adolescents. International Journal of Psychophysiology 23: 25-31.
24. Jausovec N, Jausovec K, (2000) Correlations between ERP parameters and intelligence: a reconsideration. Biological Psychology 55: 137-154.
25. Jausovec N, Jausovec K, (2003) Spatiotemporal brain activity related to intelligence: a low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography study. Cognitive Brain Research 16: 267-272.
26. Swiatek MA, (1995) An empirical investigation of the social coping strategies used by gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly 39: 154.
27. Wechsler D, (1992) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: WISC-III: Psychological Corporation London.
28. Khatena J, Torrance EP, (1976) Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory.
29. Brody LE, Benbow CP, (1986) Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 15: 1-18.
30. Dauber SL, Benbow CP, (1990) Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly 34: 10.
31. Murnighan JK, Saxon MS, (1998) Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults. Journal of Economic Psychology 19: 415-445.
32. Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K, (2000) Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289: 1773-1775.
33. Slembeck T, (1999) Reputations and fairness in bargaining-experimental evidence from a repeated ultimatum game with fixed opponents. Discussion Paper.