Analyzing the degree of technology use occurring in pre-service teacher education

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-157

  Stobaugh, Rebecca Ruth ^a   Tassell, Janet Lynne ^a  

^a WKU College of Education and Behavioral Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Teacher education; Teacher work sample; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953718035     PISSN: 18748597     EISSN: 18748600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-011-9118-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bannister, S., & Ross, C. (2005). From high school to college: how prepared are teacher candidates for technology integration? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22, 75-79.
2. Beckett, E., Wetzel, K., Buss, R., Marquez-Chisholm, I., & Midobuche, E. (2001). Preservice and inservice teachers collaborate to integrate technology into K-8 classrooms. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001(1), 1858-1863. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
3. Benson, L. F., Farnsworth, B. J., Damon, B., Lewis, V. K., & Shara, S. L. (2004). The impact of training in technology assisted instruction on skills and attitude of pre-service teachers. Education, 124(4), 649-663.
4. Denner, P., Norman, A. D., Salzman, S., Pankratz, R., & Evans, S. (2004). The Renaissance Partnership teacher work sample: Evidence supporting score generalizability, validity, and quality of student learning assessment. ATE Yearbook XII, pp 23-56.
5. Duhaney, D. C. (2001). Teacher education: preparing teachers to integrate technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(1), 23-30.
6. Education Market Research. (2009). The complete K-12 report: Market facts and segment analyses, 2009. New York.
7. Finley, L., & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319-337.
8. Hadley, N., Eisenwine, M. J., Hakes, J. A., & Hines, C. (2002). Technology infusion in the curriculum: thinking outside the box. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 4(1), 5-13.
9. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). The national educational technology standards for students. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
10. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). The national educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
11. International Society for Technology Education. (2009). Retrieved May 13, 2009, from the International Society of Technology Education Web site: http://www. iste. org/AM/Template. cfm?Section=NETS.
12. Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
13. Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education program for initial licensure (NCES 2008-040). National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education: Washington, D. C.
14. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure: Statistical analysis report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Education.
15. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Teacher Preparation Institutions. Washington, D. C.
16. Norman, A. D. (2008). WKU professional education unit: Assessment report-Initial preparation program (abridged). Retrieved November 14, 2008 from http://edtech. wku. edu/peu/documents/Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0708_Abridged. pdf.
17. Norman, A. D., Evans, S., & Pankratz, R. (2009). Using TWS methodology to establish credible evidence for quality teacher preparation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Pankratz, R. (1999). Improving teacher quality through partnerships that connect teacher performance to student learning. Unpublished manuscript, Western Kentucky University.
19. Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M., & Girod, G. (1997). Teacher work sample methodology as used at Western Oregon State College. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 15-45). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
20. The Renaissance Partnership for Improving Teacher Quality. (2001). Teacher work sample: Performance prompt, teaching process standards, scoring rubrics. Retrieved on July 1, 2009 from http://fp. uni. due/itq/ProjectActivities/index. htm.
21. U. S. Department of Education. (2008). National educational technology trends study: Local-level data summary. U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service: Washington, D. C.
22. Vannatta, R. A., & Beyerback, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 132-148.
23. Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Increasing computer use in early childhood teacher education: The case of a "computer muddler". Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 2(4). Retrieved January 25, 2005, from http://www. citejournal. org/vol2/iss4/general/article1. cfm.