Nonmarital childbearing in russia: second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage?

Demography

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 317-342

  Perelli Harris, Brienna ^a   Gerber, Theodore P ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohabitation; Fertility; Nonmarital childbearing; Russia; Single mothers

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953698421     PISSN: 00703370     EISSN: 15337790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13524-010-0001-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Brien, M. J., Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1999). Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage, and nonmarital conception. Demography, 36, 535-51.
4. Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-55.
5. Brown, S., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668-78.
6. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.
7. Carlson, E., & Klinger, A. (1987). Partners in life: Unmarried couples in Hungary. European Journal of Population, 3, 85-99.
8. Cartwright, K. (2000). Shotgun weddings and the meaning of marriage in Russia: An event history analysis. The History of the Family, 5, 1-23.
9. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Gerber, T. P. (2002). Structural change and post-socialist stratification: Labor market transitions in contemporary Russia. American Sociological Review, 67, 629-59.
11. Gerber, T. P., & Berman, D. (2008). Heterogeneous condom use in Russia. Studies in Family Planning, 39, 1-17.
12. Gerber, T. P., & Berman, D. (2010). Entry to marriage and cohabitation in Russia, 1985-2000: Trends, correlates, and explanations. European Journal of Population, 26, 3-31.
13. Gerber, T. P., & Hout, M. (1998). More shock than therapy: Employment and income in Russia, 1991-1995. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1-50.
14. Gibson-Davis, C., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301-12.
15. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506-19.
16. Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214-30.
17. Hoem, J. (1986). The impact of education on modern family-union initiation. European Journal of Population, 2, 113-33.
18. Hoem, J. M., Kostova, D., Jasilioniene, A., & Muresan, C. (2009). Traces of the second demographic transition in central and eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation. European Journal of Population, 25, 239-55.
19. Houle, R., & Shkolnikov, V. (2005). Low response rates in the cities of Moscow and Sankt-Peterburg and GGS-census comparisons of basic distributions. Working document provided with the GSS data file for Russia. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
20. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Kenney, C. T., & McLanahan, S. S. (2006). Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages? Demography, 43, 127-40.
22. Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: Here to stay? European perspectives. In D. P. Moynihan, T. Smeeding, & L. Rainwater (Eds.), The future of the family (pp. 66-95). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Klugman, J., & Motivans, A. (Eds.). (2001). Single parents and child welfare in the New Russia. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Kon, I. S. (1995). The sexual revolution in Russia: From the age of the Czars to today. Translated by J. Riordan. New York: Free Press.
25. Kostova, D. (2007). The emergence of cohabitation in a transitional socio-economic context: Evidence from Bulgaria and Russia. Demografia, 50(5), 135-62.
26. Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32, 669-98.
27. Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (2002). New forms of household formation in central and eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations? Interuniversity papers in demography. Brussels, Belgium: Interface Demography (SOCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
28. Lichter, D., Roempke Graefe, D., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50, 60-86.
29. Maleva, T., & Sinyavskaya, O. (2007). Roditeli i Deti, Myzhchini i Zhenschini v Semye i Obschestve [Parents and children, men and women in family and society], vol. 1. Moscow: IISP.
30. Manning, W. D. (1993). Marriage and cohabitation following premarital conception. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 839-50.
31. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607-27.
32. Mroz, T., & Popkin, B. V. (1995). Poverty and the economic transition in the Russian federation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 22, 2-31.
33. Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing and the marriage process. Demographic Research, 16, article 9:249-86. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol16/9.
34. Muszynska, M. (2008). Women's employment and union dissolution in a changing socio-economic context in Russia. Demographic Research, 18, article 6:181-204. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol18/6.
35. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men's career-development process. Demography, 40, 127-49.
36. Perelli-Harris, B. (2005). The path to lowest-low fertility in Ukraine. Population Studies, 59, 55-70.
37. Perelli-Harris, B. (2006). The influence of informal work and subjective well-being on childbearing in post-Soviet Russia. Population and Development Review, 32, 729-53.
38. Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Lappegard, T, Jasilioniene, A., Di Giulio, P., Keizer, R., & Koeppen, K. (2009). Examining nonmarital childbearing in Europe: Does childbearing change the meaning of cohabitation? Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Detroit, April 30-May 2.
39. Philipov, D., & Jasiloniene, A. (2008). Union formation and fertility in Bulgaria and Russia: A life table description of recent trends. Demographic Research, 19, article 62:2057-14. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol19/62.
40. Raley, R. K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: Evidence for the second demographic transition? Demography, 38, 59-66.
41. Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Offutt, K. (1996). Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963-1989. Demography, 33, 277-90.
42. Roussel, L. (1989). La famille incertaine [The uncertain family]. Paris: Odile Jacob.
43. Smith, H. L., Morgan, S. P., & Koropeckyj-Cox, T. (1996). A decomposition of trends in the nonmarital fertility ratios of blacks and whites in the United States, 1960-1992. Demography, 33, 141-51.
44. Sobotka, T. 2008. "The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe." Demographic Research, 19, article 8:171-224. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol19/8.
45. Sobotka, T, Zeman, K., & Kantorová, V. (2003). Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population, 19, 249-77.
46. Steele, F., Joshi, H., Kallis, C, & Goldstein, H. (2006). Changing compatibility of cohabitation and childbearing between young British women born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies, 60, 137-52.
47. Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in northern, western, and southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research, Special Collection 3, article 3:45-86. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/3/3.
48. Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39, 311-29.
49. Van de Kaa, D. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review, 27(Suppl.), 290-331.
50. Ventura, S. (2009). Changing patterns of nonmarital childbearing in the United States (NCHS Data Brief No. 18). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
51. Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Beets, G., Billari, F. C., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., et al. (2007). Generations and gender survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research, 17, article 14):389-440. Available online at http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol17/14.
52. Vishnevsky, A. G (1996). Family, fertility, and demographic dynamics in Russia: Analysis and forecast. In J. Da Vanzo (Ed.), Russia's demographic "crisis" (pp. 1-35). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for Russia and Eurasia.
53. Weakliem, D. L. (2002). The effects of education on political opinions: An international study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 141-57.
54. Wu, L. L., Bumpass, L. L., & Musick, K. (2001). Historical and life course trajectories of nonmarital childbearing. In L. L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility (pp. 3-48). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55. Wu, L. L., & Wolfe, B. (Eds.). (2001). Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Zakharov, S. V (2008). The first and second demographic transition in Russia: Recent trends in the context of historic experience. In T. Frejka, T. Sobotka, J. Hoem, & L. Toulemon (Eds.), Childbearing trends and policies: Country case studies (pp. 907-72). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
57. Zakharov, S. V, Vishnevskii, A. G, & Sakevich, V I. (2005). Brachnost i rozhdaemost [Marriage and fertility]. In A. G Vishnevskii (Ed.), Naselenie Rossii [Population of Russia] (pp. 40-130). Moscow: Higher School of Economics.