Overview chapter 6: The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe

Demographic Research

Volumn 19, Issue , 2008, Pages 171-224

  Sobotka, Tomáš ^a  

^a VIENNA INSTITUTE OF DEMOGRAPHY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849096732     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8     Document Type: Review

References (132)

1. Adsera, A. 2004. "Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labour market institutions." Journal of Population Economics 17(1): 1-27.
2. Ariès, P. 1980. "Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West." Population and Development Review, 6(4): 645-650.
3. Avdeev A. and A. Monnier. 1995. "A survey of modern Russian fertility". Population: An English selection 7: 1-38,
4. Baizán, P., A. Aassve, and F. C. Billari. 2003. "Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain". European Journal of Population 19 (2): 147-169.
5. Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge.
6. Beets, G., E. Dourleijn, A. Liefbroer, and K. Henkens. 2001. De timing van het eerste kind in Nederland en Europa. Raport No. 59, NIDI, Den Haag.
7. Billari, F. C. and C. Wilson. 2001. "Convergence towards diversity? Cohort dynamics in the transition to adulthood in contemporary Western Europe". MPIDR Working paper WP, 2001-39, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/ Working/WP-2001-039.pdf
8. Binyon, M. 1983. Life in Russia. New York: Pantheon Books.
9. Bourdelais, P. and V. Gourdon. 2006. "Demographic categories revisited. Age categories and the age of the categories." In.: C. Sauvain-Dugerdil, H. Leridon, and N. Mascie-Taylor (eds.) Human Clock. The Bio-cultural Meanings of Age. Vol. 5, Population, Family, and Society. Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 245-269.
10. Bracher, M. and G. Santow.. 1998. "Economic independence and union formation in Sweden." Population Studies 52: 275-294.
11. Bumpass, L. and H.-H. Lu. 2000. "Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family context in the United States." Population Studies 54(1): 29-41.
12. Bumpass, L. L. and J. A. Sweet. 1989. "National estimates of cohabitation." Demography 26(4): 615-625.
13. Cliquet, R. L. 1991. The second demographic transition: fact or fiction? Population Studies, Vol. 23. Council of Europe, Strasbourg
14. Coale, A. J. 1973. "The demographic transition reconsidered." In: IUSSP, Proceedings of the International Piqpulation Conference, Liège, Editions Ordina, Vol. 1, pp. 53-72.
15. Coleman, D. 2004. "Why we don't have to believe without doubting in the "Second demographic transition" - some agnostic comments." Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2004: 11-24.
16. Council of Europe. 2006. Recent demographic developments in Europe 2005. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
17. CZSO. 1996. Pohyb obyvatelstva v Ceské republice v roce 1995 [Population movement in the Czech Republic in 1995]. Český statistický úřad/Czech Statistical Office, Prague.
18. CZSO. 2006. Demografická ročenka: České republiky 2005 [Demographic yearbook of the Czech Republic 2005], Český statistický úřad/Czech Statistical Office, Prague. http://www.czso.cz/csu/2006edicniplan.nsf/ p/4019-06
19. Dalla Zuanna, G., A. De Rose, and F. Racioppi. 2005. "Low fertility and limited diffusion of modern contraception in Italy during the second half of the twentieth Century." Journal of Population Research 22(1): 21-48.
20. de Beer, J., M. Corijn and F. Deven. 2000. "Summary and discussion." In: J. De Beer and F. Deven (eds.) Diversity in Family Formation. The 2nd Demographic Transition in Belgium and in the Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 115-130.
21. De Rose, A., Racioppi, F., and Zanatta, A-L. 2008. Italy: Delayed adaptation of social institutions to changes in family behaviour, Demographic Research 19(19). http://www.demographic-research.org/ Volumes/Vol19/19/
22. de Feijter, H. 1991. Voorlopers bij demografische veranderingen. NIDI Reports No. 22, NIDI, The Hague.
23. de Graaf, A. and C. Van Duin. 2007. "Bevolkingsprognose 2006-2050: veronderstellingen over de geboorte." Bevolkingstrends, le kwartaal 2007: 45-55. www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/bevolking/publicaties/ artikelen/archief/2007/2007-kl-b15-p45-art.htm
24. Delgado, M., Meil, G., and Zamora López, F. 2008. Spain: Short on children and short on family policies, Demographic Research 19(27). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/27/
25. Dorbritz, J. 2008. Germany: Family diversity with low actual and desired fertility, Demographic Research 19(17). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/17/
26. Drakulić, S. 1996. Café Europa. Life after Communism. London: Abacus.
27. Ekert-Jaffé, O., H. Joshi, K. Lynch, R. Mougin, and M. Rendall. 2002. "Fertility, timing of births and socio-economic status in France and Britain". Population-E 57 (3): 475-508.
28. Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.
30. Eurostat. 2006. Population statistics. 2006 edition. Luxembourg: Office for official Publications of the European Communities.
31. Ferge, Z. 1997. "Women and social transformation in Central-Eastern Europe". Czech Sociological Review 5 (2): 159-178.
32. Fokkema, T. and I. Esveldt. 2008. "Motivation to have children in Europe" In:.Ch. Höhn, D. Avramov, and I. Kotowska (Eds.) People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study - Volume 1. Berlin: Springer, pp. 141-155.
33. Frejka, T. and J.-P. Sardon. 2007. "Cohort birth order, parity progression ratio and parity distribution trends in developed countries." Demographit Research 16, Article 11 pp. 315-374. www.demographic-research.org
34. FSO. 1991. Pohyb obyvatelstva v České a Slovenské Federativní republice v roce 1990: část 1. Federální statistický úřad (Federal Statistical Office), Český statistický úřad, Slovenský statistický úřad, Praha.
35. Fux, B. 2008. "Pathways of welfare and population-related policies. Towards a multidimensional typology of welfare state regimes in Eastern and Western Europe". In: Ch. Höhn, D. Avramov, and I. Kotowska (Eds.) People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study - Volume 1. Berlin: Springer, pp. 59-90.
36. Gerber, T. P. and D. Berman. 2006. "Economic Crisis or Second Demographic Transition? Trends and Correlates of Union Formation in Russia, 1985-2001." Updated version, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America 2005, Philadelphia.
37. Gerber, T. P. and E. B. Cottrell. 2006. "Fertility in Russia, 1985-2001. Insights from individual fertility histories." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, March 2006.
38. Giddens, A. 1992. The transformation of intimacy. Sexuality, love & eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press, Cambridge.
39. Goldin, C. 2006. "The quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family." American Economic Review 96(2): 1-21.
40. GUS. 2004. Rocznik demograficzny. Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2004. Główny urzad statystyczny/Central Statistical Office, Warsaw.
41. Hajnal, J. 1965. "European marriage patterns in perspective". In.: D. V. Glass and D. Eversley (eds.) Population in history. London, pp. 101-143.
42. Halman, L. 2001. The European Values Study. A third wave. Source book of the 1999/2000 European Values Study surveys. WORC, Tilburg University.
43. Härkönen, J. and J. Dronkers. 2006. "Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce. A comparison of seventeen countries." European Sociological Review 22(5): 501-517.
44. Heuveline, P. and J. M. Timberlake. 2004. "The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective." Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1214-1230.
45. Hoem, J. 1986. "The impact of education on modern family initiation." European Journal of Population 2: 113-133.
46. Hoem, J., A. Jasilioniene, D. Kostova, and C. Muresan. 2007. "The second demographic transition in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation." Research note, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
47. Hoem, J., G. Neyer, and G. Andersson. 2006. "Education and childlessness: the relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955-59." Demographic Research 14, Article 15: 331-380. http://www.demographic-research.org
48. Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
49. Kalmijn, M. 2007. "Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe." Population Studies 61(3): 243-263.
50. Katus, K., A. Puur, A. Põldma, and L. Sakkeus. 2007. "First union formation in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania: Patterns across countries and gender." Demographic Research 17, Article 10: 247-360. http://www.demographic-research.org
51. Keitzer, D. K., M. W. White, L. Bernardi, and G. G. Gabrielli. 2006. "Italy's path to very low fertility. The adequacy of economic and second demographic transition theories." MPIDR Working Paper WP-2006-049, Max Planck Instittue for demographic research, Rostock. http://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2006-049.pdf.
52. Keyfitz, N. 1986. "The family that does not reproduce itself" In.: Below-Replacement Fertility in Industrial Societies: Causes, Consequences, Policies. Supplement to Vol. 12, Population and Development Review, pp. 139-154
53. Kiernan, K. 2004. "Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe". Law & Policy 26(1): 33-55.
54. Kiernan, K. 1999. "Childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe." Population Trends 98 (Winter 1999): 11-20.
55. Kohler, H.-P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. 2002. "The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s". Population and Development Review 28 (4): 641-680.
56. Kotowska, I., Jóźwiak, J., Matysiak, A., and Baranowska, A. 2008. Poland: Fertility decline as a response to profound societal and labour market changes?, Demographic Research 19(22). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/22/
57. Koytcheva, E., and Philipov, D. 2008. Bulgaria: Ethnic differentials in rapidly declining fertility, Demographic Research 19(13). http://www.demographic-researeh.org/Volumes/Vol19/13/
58. Kraaykamp, G. 2002. "Trends and countertrends in sexual permissiveness: Three decades of attitude change in thye Netherlands." Journal of Marriage and the Family 64: 225-239.
59. Kuijsten, A. C. 1996. "Changing family patterns in Europe: A case of divergence?" European Journal of Population 12(2): 115-143.
60. Lesthaeghe, R. 1995. "The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation". In.: K. O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen (eds.) Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 17-62.
61. Lesthaeghe, R. and K. Neels. 2002. "From the first to the second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland". European Journal of Population 18(4): 325-360.
62. Lesthaeghe, R. and L. Neidert. 2006. "The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example?" Population and Development Review 32(4): 669-698.
63. Lesthaeghe, R., L. Neidert and J. Surkyn. 2006. "Household formation and the 'Second demographic transition' in Europe and the U.S. Insights from middle range models." http://sdt.pse.isr.umich.edu/pubs/online/ rl_romantic_unions_paper.pdf
64. Lesthaeghe R. and J. Sukyn. 1988. "Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change." Population and Development Review 14(1): 1-45.
65. Lesthaeghe, R. and J. Surkyn. 2002. "New forms of household formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations?" In.: Economic Survey of Europe 2002/1. Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations, New York and Geneva, pp. 197-216.
66. Lesthaeghe, R. and J. Surkyn. 2004. "When history moves on: The foundations and diffusion of a second demographic transition" Paper presented at the seminar on "Ideational perspectives on international family change", Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research' (ISR), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. http://sdt.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/online/WhenHistoryMovesOn_final.pdf.
67. Lesthaeghe, R. and D. J. van de Kaa. 1986. "Twee demografische transities?" In.: D. J. van de Kaa and R. Lesthaeghe (eds.) Bevolking: groei en krimp. Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer, pp. 9-24.
68. Lesthaeghe, R and C Vanderhoeft. 2001. "Ready, willing, and able: a conceptualization of transitions to new behavioral forms." In.: J. B. Casterline (ed.) Diffusion processes and fertility transition. Selected perspectives,. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 240-264.
69. Liefbroer, A. C. 2005. "The impact of perceived costs and rewards of childbearing on entry into parenthood: Evidence from a panel study." European Journal of Population 21(4): 367-391.
70. Liefbroer, A. C. and T. Fokkema. 2008. "Recent developments in demographically relevant attitudes and behaviour: New challenges for a new era?" In.: J. Surkyn, P. Deboosere and J. van Bavel and (eds.) Demographic challenges for the 21st Century. A state of art in demography. Brussels: VUBPRESS, pp. 115-141.
71. Lundberg, S. and R. A. and Pollak. 2007. "The American family and family economics." Working Paper 12908, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12968.
72. Lutz, W. and T. Sobotka. 2008. "Misleading policy messages from the period TFR: Should we stop using it?" Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, 17-19 April 2008.
73. Lutz, W., V. Skirbekk, and M. R. Testa. 2006. "The low fertility trap hypothesis. Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe." Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 167-192.
74. Manning, N. 2004. "Diversity and change in pre-accession Central and Eastern Europe since 1989." Journal of European Social Policy 14(3): 211-232.
75. Matsuo, H. 2001. "Is Japan a second demographic transition country? Observations based on union, first birth status and values in the Netherlands and Japan." Paper presented at workshop "The Second Demographic Transition in Europe," Bad Herrenalb, Germany, 23-28 June 2001. http://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/workshops/010623_paper23.pdf.
76. McDonald, P. 2000. "Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility" Journal of Population Research 17 (1): 1-15.
77. McLanahan, S. 2004. "Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition?" Demography 41(4): 607-627.
78. Micheli, G. 2004. "On the verge of familistic interpretation. Familism, moods and other alchemies." In.: G. Dalla Zuanna and G. Micheli -(eds.) Strong family and low fertility: A paradox?" European Studies of Population, Vol. 14, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 127-160.
79. Mills, M. and H.-P. Blossfeld. 2005. "Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course. A. theoretical framework." In: H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills and K. Kurz (eds.) Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society. London/New York: Routledge Advances in Sociology Series, pp. 1-24
80. Možný, I. and T. Katrňák. 2005. "The Czech family". In.: B. N. Adams and J. Trost (eds.) Handbook of World Families. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc, pp. 235-261.
81. Muresan, C. 2007. "Family dynamics in pre- and post-transition Romania: a life-table description." MPIDR Working paper WP 2007-18, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock. www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/Working/WP-2007-018.pdf
82. Muresan, C., Hãrãgus, P.T., Hãrãgus, M., and Schröder, C. 2008. Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context, Demographic Research 19(23). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/23/
83. Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler, and F. C. Billari. "Human development and low fertility." Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New, Orleans, 17-19 April 2008.
84. Neels, K. 2006. Reproductive strategies in Belgian fertility. NIDI/CBGS Publications No. 38, Brussels: CBGS.
85. OECD. 2005. Education at a glance 2005. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
86. Oláh, L., and Bernhardt, E. 2008. Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality. Demographic Research 19(28). http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/Vol19/28/
87. Pagnini, D. L. and R. R. Rindfuss. 1993. "The divorce of marriage and childbearing: Changing attitudes and behaviour in the United States." Population and Development Review 19(2): 331-347.
88. Perelli-Harris, B. 2008. Ukraine: On the border between old and new in uncertain times, Demographic Research 19(29). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/29/
89. Philipov, D. 2003. "Fertility in times of discontinuous societal change." In.: I. Kotowska, and J. Jóźwiak (eds.) Population of Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities. Statistical Publishing Establishment, Warsaw, pp. 665-689.
90. Philipov, D. 2006. "Portrait of the family in Europe." Chapter 2 in.: L. Hantrais, D. Philipov, and F. C. Billari (eds.) Policy implications of changing family formation. Population Studies, No. 49, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
91. Philipov, D. and A. Jasilioniene. 2007. "Union formation and fertility in Bulgaria and Russia: a life table description of recent trends." MPIDR. Working paper WP 2007-05, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock. www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/ Working/WP-2007-005.pdf
92. Pongrácz, M. 2002. "Birth out of wedlock." Working Papers on Population, Family and Welfare. Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Demographic research Institute, Budapest.
93. Pongrácz, M. and Z. Spéder. 2008. "Attitudes towards forms of partnership." In: Ch, Höhn, D. Avramov, and I. Kotowska (Eds.) People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study - Volume 1. Berlin: Springer, pp. 93-112.
94. Potančoková, M. 2007. "Konštrukcia plánovaného rodičovstva v období štátneho socializmu v bývalom Československu." [Construction of family planning in the era of state socialism in former Czechoslovakia]. Gender-rovné příležitosti-výzkum 8(2/2007). www.genderonline.cz.
95. Potančoková, M., Vaňo, B., Pilinská, V., and Jurčová, D. 2008. Slovakia: Fertility between tradition and modernity, Demographic Research 19(25). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/25/
96. Prioux, F. 2006. "Recent demographic developments in France." Population-E 61(4): 323-364.
97. Ravanera, Z. R. and F. Rajulton. 2004. "Social status polarization in the timing and trajectories to motherhood." Discussion Paper No. 04-06, Population Studies Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
98. Reher, S. D. 1998. "Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts". Population and Development Review 24 (2): 203-234.
99. Rendall, M. S. and S. Smallwood. 2003. "Higher qualifications, first-birth timing, and further childbearing in Englands and Wales". Population Trends 111 (Spring 2003): 18-26.
100. RHS. 2005. Reproductive Health Survey, Romania 2004. Summary Report. Ministry of Health, World Bank, UNFPA, USAID, UNICEF.
101. Rindfuss, R. R., M. K. Choe, L. L. Bumpass, and N. O. Tsuya. 2004. "Social networkds and fertility change in Japan." American Sociological Rewiew 69: 838-861.
102. Rosina, A. and R. Fraboni. 2004. "Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy?" Demographic Research 11 (Article 6): 149-172. [www.demographic-research.org]
103. Rotariu, T. 2006. "Romania and the Second Demographic Transition. The traditional value system and low fertility rates." International Journal of Sociology 36(1):10-27.
104. Salles, A. 2006. "The effects of family policy in the former GDR on nuptiality and births outside marriage." Population-E 2006, 61(1-2): 141-152.
105. Smock, P. J. 2000. "Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications." Annual Review of Sociology 26: 1-20
106. Sobotka, T. 2003. "Re-emerging diversity: Rapid fertility changes in Central and Eastern Europe after the collapse of the communist regimes". Population-E 2003, 58 (4-5): 451-486.
107. Sobotka, T. 2004. Postponement of childbearing and low fertility in Europe. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
108. Sobotka, T. 2005. "Childless societies? Trends and projections of childlessness in Europe and the Unites States" Paper presented at the 2005 PAA Annual Meeting Meeting, Philadelphia, 31 March-2 April 2005.
109. Sobotka, T. 2008. "Does persistent low fertility threaten the future of European populations?" In: J. Surkyn, P. Deboosere and J. van Bavel and (eds.) Demographic challenges for the 21st Century. A state of art in demography. Brussels: VUBPRESS, pp. 27-89.
110. Sobotka, T., K. Zeman, and V. Kantorová 2003. "Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view". European Journal of Population 19 (3): 249-277.
111. Sobotka, T. and M. A. Testa. 2008. "Attitudes and intentions towards childlessness in Europe". In: Ch. Höhn, D. Avramov, and I. Kotowska (Eds.) People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study - Volume 1. Berlin: Springer, pp. 177-211.
112. Sobotka, T., Štastná, A., Zeman, K., Hamplová, D., aud Kantorová, V. 2008. Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism, Demographic Research 19(14). http://www.demographic-research.org/ Volumes/Vol19/14/
113. Spéder, Z. 2005. "The rise of cohabitation as first union and some neglected factors of recent demographic developments in Hungary." Demográfia, English Edition 48(2005): 77-103.
114. Stankuniene, V. and A. Maslauskaite. 2008. "Family transformations in the post-communist countries: Attitudes toward changes." In: Ch. Höhn, D. Avramov, and I. Kotowska (Eds.) People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study - Volume 1. Berlin: Springer, pp. 113-138.
115. Stankuniene, V., and Jasilioniene, A. 2008. Lithuania: Fertility decline and its determinants, Demographic Research 19(20). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/20/
116. Statistics Austria. 2006. Demographisches Jahrbuch Österreichs 2005. Vienna: Statistics Austria.
117. Statistics Austria. 1997. Demographisches Jahrbuch Österreichs 1996. Österreichisches Statistischen Zentralamt, Vienna.
118. Stropnik, N., and Šircelj, M. 2008. Slovenia: Generous family policy without evidence of any fertility impact, Demographic Research 19(26). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/ 26/
119. Thornton, A. and D. Philipov. 2007. "Developmental idealism and family and demographic change in Central and Eastern Europe." European Demographic Research Papers 3/2007. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography.
120. Thornton, A. and L. Young-deMarco. "Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s." Journal of Marriage and Family 63: 1009-1037.
121. Toulemon, L., Pailhé, A., Rossier, C. 2008. France: High and stable fertility, Demographic Research 19(16). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/16/
122. van Bavel, J. 2007. "Subreplacement fertility in the West before the baby boom (1900-1940). Current and contemporary perspectives." Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association, Chicago IL, November 18, 2007.
123. van de Kaa, D. J. 1987. "Europe's second demographic transition". Population Bulletin 42(1).
124. van de Kaa, D. J. 1994. "The second demographic transition revisited: Theories and expectations". In.: G. Beets et al. (eds.) Population and family in the Low Countries 1993: Late fertility and other current issues. NIDI/CBGS Publication, No. 30, Swets and Zeitlinger, Berwyn, Pennsylvania/Amsterdam, pp. 81-126.
125. van de Kaa, D. J. 1996. "Anchored narratives: The story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility." Population Studies 50(3): 389-432.
126. van de Kaa, D. J. 2001. "Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior". In.: R. A. Bulatao, J. B. Casterline (eds.) Global fertility transition. Supplement to Population and Development Review 27, New York, Population Council, pp. 290-338.
127. van de Kaa, D. J. 2002. "The idea of a Second Demographic Transition in industrialized countries." Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Tokyo, Japan, 29 January 2002. http://www.ipss.go.jp/ webj-ad/WebJournal.files/population/2003_4/Kaa.pdf.
128. van de Kaa, D. J. 2004a. "The true commonality: In reflexive societies fertility is a derivative". Population Studies 58(1): 77-80.
129. van de Kaa, D. J. 2004b. "Demographic revolutions or transitions. A foreword." In: T. Frejka, and J.-P. Sardon (eds.) Childbearing trends and prospects in low-fertility countries: A cohort analysis, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. x-xiv.
130. van Peer, C. and L. Rabušic. 2008. "Will we see an upturn in European fertility in the near future?" In: Ch. Höhn, D. Avramov, and I. Kotowska (Eds.) People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study - Volume 1. Berlin: Springer, pp. 215-241.
131. World Bank. 2007. World development Indicators. Database accessed at http://web.worldbank.org
132. Zakharov, S. 2008. Russian Federation: From the first to second demographic transition, Demographic Research 19(24). http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/24/