The bit in the middle and why it's important: A computational analysis of the linguistic features of body paragraphs

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 201-209

  Myers, John C ^a   McCarthy, Philip M ^a   Duran, Nicholas D ^a   McNamara, Danielle S ^a,b  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Coh metrix; Cohesion; Essay evaluation; NLP; Text difficulty; Writing ability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT; WRITING;

HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SEMANTICS; STUDENTS; WRITING;

EID: 79953680454     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-010-0021-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R (1st ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
2. College Board (2009). College Board Announces Scores for New SAT® with Writing Section. Retrieved from http://www. collegeboard. com/press/releases/150054. html on October 25, 2009.
3. Coltheart, M. (1981). MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 497-505.
4. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computationally assessing lexical differences in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 119-135.
5. Crossley, S. A., White, M. J., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). The effects of elaboration and cohesion on human evaluations of writing proficiency. Poster presentation at the, Society for Computers in Psychology Conference (SCiP). Boston: Massachusetts.
6. Duran, N., Bellissens, C., Taylor, R., & McNamara, D. (2007). Qualifying text difficulty with automated indices of cohesion and semantics. In D. S. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 233-238). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
7. Essay Info (2009). Five-paragraph Essay Writing. Retrieved from http://essayinfo. com/essays/5-paragraph essay. php on October 25, 2009.
8. Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words. Behaviour Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395-427.
9. Graesser, A. C. & McNamara, D. S. (in press). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science.
10. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2010). Theoretical and automated dimensions of text difficulty: How easy are the texts we read? Manuscript sumbitted for publication.
11. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193-202.
12. Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357-374.
13. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
14. Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Lightman, E. J., McCarthy, P. M., Dufty, D. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The structural organization of high school educational texts. In D. Wilson & G. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference (pp. 235-240). Menlo Park, California: The AAAI.
16. Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., McNamara, D. S., & Graesser, A. C. (2004). Variation in language and cohesion across written and spoken registers. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual cognitive science society (pp. 843-848). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. McCarthy, P. M., Guess, R. H., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). The components of paraphrase evaluations. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 682-690.
18. McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 381-392.
19. McCarthy, P. M., Lewis, G. A., Dufty, D. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2006). Analyzing writing styles with Coh-Metrix. In Proceedings of the Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society International Conference (FLAIRS) (pp. 764-770).
20. McCarthy, P. M., Renner, A. M., Duncan, M. G., Duran, N. D., Lightman, E. J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Identifying topic sentencehood. Behavioral Research Methods, 21, 364-372.
21. McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62.
22. McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2009). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57-86.
23. McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Coh-metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47, 292-330.
24. Meyer, B. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121-143.
25. Nunnally, T. E. (1991). Breaking the five paragraph theme barrier. English Journal, 80, 67-71.
26. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228-242.
27. Richter, T. (2006). What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes, 41, 221-250.
28. Smith, K. (2006). In defense of the five-paragraph essay. English Journal, 95, 16-17.
29. StatSoft, Inc. (2010). Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. Retrieved from http://www. statsoft. com/textbook/ on February 16, 2010.
30. Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
32. Wesley, K. (2000). The ill effects of the five paragraph theme. English Journal, 90, 57-60.
33. Wiley, M. (2000). The popularity of formulaic writing (and why we need to resist). English Journal, 90, 61-67.
34. Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183-209.