Social dominance orientation,ambivalent sexism, and abortion: Explaining pro-choice and pro-life attitudes

Personality Assessment: New Research

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 309-320

  Osborne, Danny ^a   Davies, Paul G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953662629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., and Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125
2. Bahr, S. J., and Marcos, A. C. (2003). Cross-cultural attitudes toward abortion: Greeks versus Americans. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 402-424
3. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1173-1182
4. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., Plessis, I., and Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93
5. Fried, A. (1988). Abortion politics as symbolic politics: An investigation into belief systems. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 137-154
6. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., and Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334
7. Glick, P., and Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512
8. Glick, P., and Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118
9. Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., and Auguiar de Souza, M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292-297
10. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., and John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93-104
11. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press
12. Jelen, T. G., Damore, D. F., and Lamatsch, T. (2002). Gender, Employment status, and abortion: A longitudinal analysis. Sex Roles, 47, 321-330
13. Jost, J. T., and Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1-27
14. Jost, J. T., and Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509
15. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., and Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763
16. Roberts, D. E. (1998). The future of reproductive choice for poor women and women of color. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women's bodies: Sexuality, appearance, and behavior (270-277). New York: Oxford University Press
17. Russell, B. L., and Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565-573
18. Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., and Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 296-302
19. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530
20. Sibley, C. G., and Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687-696
21. Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press
22. Strickler, J., and Danigelis, N. L. (2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17, 187-201
23. van Hiel, A., and Mervielde, I. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2323-2344
24. Viki, G. T., and Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289-293
25. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., and Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295-303
26. Wall, S. N., Frieze, I. H., Ferligoj, A., Jarosova, E., Paulknerova, D., Horvat, J., et al. (1999). Gender role and religion as predictors of attitude toward abortion in Croatia, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 443-465
27. Wang, G. (2004). Social and cultural determinants of attitudes toward abortion: A test of Reiss' hypotheses. The Social Science Journal, 41, 93-105