Movement kinematics of prepotent response suppression in aging during conflict adaptation

Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Volumn 66 B, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 185-194

  Trewartha, Kevin M ^a,b,c   Penhune, Virginia B ^a,b,c   Li, Karen Z H ^a,c  

^a Center for Research in Human Development   (Canada)

^b Centre for Clinical Research in Health   (Canada)

^c Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aging; Conflict monitoring; Movement kinematics; Response suppression

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953327946     PISSN: 10795014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbq090     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Band, G. P. H., & Kok, A. (2000). Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task. Biological Psychology, 5, 201-221. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00038-1. (Pubitemid 30109230)
2. Borella, E., Delaloye, C., Lacerf, T., Renaud, O., & De Ribaupierre, A. (2009). Do age differences between younger and older adults in inhibitory tasks depend on the degree of activation of information. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 445-472. doi:10.1080/09541440802613997.
3. Bosman, E. A. (1993). Age-related differences in the motoric aspects of transcription typing skill. Psychology and Aging, 8, 87-102. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.8.1.87.
4. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Re-view, 108, 624-652. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.624. (Pubitemid 33604139)
5. Braver, T. S., & Barch, D. M. (2002). A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 809-817. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00067-2. (Pubitemid 35430285)
6. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76-106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Educational Testing Service. (1976). Extended range vocabulary test: Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of target letters in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://app.psychonomic-journals.org/.
9. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.121.4. 480.
10. Haaland, K. Y., Harrington, D. L., & Grice, J. W. (1993). Effects of aging on planning and implementing arm movements. Psychology and Aging, 8, 617-632. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.8.4.617.
11. Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653-675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Kennedy, K. M., & Raz, N. (2005). Age, sex and regional brain volumes predict perceptual-motor skill acquisition. Cortex, 41, 560-569. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70196-5. (Pubitemid 40932319)
13. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026. doi:10.1126/science.1089910. (Pubitemid 38209708)
14. Ketcham, C. J., Seidler, R. D., Van Gemmert, A. W. A., & Stelmach, G. E. (2002). Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task diffi-culty, target size, and movement amplitude. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57, P54-P64. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.1.P54. (Pubitemid 34052887)
15. Ketcham, C. J., & Stelmach, G. E. (2001). Age-related declines in motor control. In J. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and aging (pp. 313-348). New York, NY: Academic Press.
16. Koch, I. (2007). Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. Human Movement Science, 26, 257-274. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.004. (Pubitemid 46444717)
17. Kolev, V., Falkenstein, M., & Yordanova, J. (2006). Motor-response gen-eration as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks. Neurobiology of Aging, 27, 1719-1730. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005. 09.027. (Pubitemid 44344846)
18. Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 684-700. doi:10.1037/h0080661.
19. Mathalon, D. H., Bennett, A., Askari, N., Gray, E. M., Rosenbloom, M. J., & Ford, J. M. (2003). Response-monitoring dysfunction in aging and Alzheimer's disease: An event-related potential study. Neurobiology of Aging, 24, 675-685 .doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00154-9. (Pubitemid 37288867)
20. Mathewson, K. J., Dywan, J., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2005). Brain bases of error-related ERPs as influenced by age and task. Biological Psychology, 70, 88-104. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.12.005. (Pubitemid 41306257)
21. Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96-109. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.16.1.96. (Pubitemid 32230558)
22. Mayr, U., & Liebscher, T. (2001). Is there an age deficit in the selection of mental sets? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 47-69. doi:10.1080/09541440042000214. (Pubitemid 32367201)
23. McDowd, J. M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1988). Effects of aging and task diffi-culty on divided attention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 267-280. doi:10.1037//0096- 1523.14.2.267.
24. Mutter, S. A., Naylor, J. C., & Patterson, E. R. (2005). The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance. Memory & Cognition, 33, 514-530. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://mc.Psychonomic-journals.org/ content/33/3/514.long (Pubitemid 46207077)
25. Nessler, D., Friedman, D., Johnson, R., Jr., & Bersick, M. (2007). ERPs suggest that age affects cognitive control but not response conflict detection. Neurobiology of Aging, 28, 1769-1782. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging. 2006.07.011. (Pubitemid 47384949)
26. Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Talsma, D., Coles, M. G. H., Holroyd, C. B., Kok, A., & van der Molen, M. W. (2002). A compu-tational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 19-36. doi:10.3758/CABN.2.1.19. (Pubitemid 38391249)
27. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophsiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type fre-quency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26. doi:10.3758/CABN.3.1.17. (Pubitemid 37517032)
28. O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., Bellgrove, M. A., Kelly, S. P., Hester, R., Garavan, H., . . . Foxe, J. J. (2007). The role of the cingulate cortex in the detection of errors with and without awareness: A high-density electrical mapping study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 2571-2579. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05477.x. (Pubitemid 46625913)
29. Pilar, A., Guerrini, C., Phillips, L. E., & Perfect, T. J. (2008). Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmen-tal Neuropsychology, 33, 101-123. doi:10.1080/87565640701884212. (Pubitemid 351431295)
30. Potter, L. M., & Grealy, M. A. (2006). Aging and inhibitory errors on a motor shift of set task. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 56-66. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0244-2.
31. Reitan, R. (1992). Trail making test: Manual for administration and scoring. South Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychological Laboratory.
32. Rekkas, P. V. (2006). Interference resolution in the elderly: Evidence suggestive of differences in strategy on measures of prepotent inhibition and dual task processing. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 341-365. doi:10.1080/138255890969302. (Pubitemid 44196004)
33. Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003). Executive func-tioning as a potential mediator of age-related decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 566-594. doi:10.1037/0096- 3445.132.4.566. (Pubitemid 37514234)
34. Seidler, R. D. (2006). Differential effects of age on sequence learning and sensorimotor adaptation. Brain Research Bulletin, 70, 337-346. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.06.008. (Pubitemid 44486556)
35. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (2001). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (pp. 213-218). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. doi:10.1037/h0054651.
37. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experi-mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345. (Pubitemid 36107178)
38. Trewartha, K. M., Endo, A., Li, K. Z. H., & Penhune, V. B. (2009). Exam-ining pre-potent response suppression in aging: A kinematic analysis. Psychology and Aging, 24, 450-461. doi:10.1037/a0015498.
39. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Verleger, R. (2002). Aging and the Simon task. Psychophysiology, 39, 100-110. doi:10.1017/S0048577202001221. (Pubitemid 34215363)
40. Verbruggen, F., Notebaert, W., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 328-333. Retrieved from http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/13/2/328.full.pdf (Pubitemid 44412018)
41. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adults Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
42. West, R., & Moore, K. (2005). Adjustments of cognitive control in younger and older adults. Cortex, 41, 570-581. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.13.2.206. (Pubitemid 40932320)
43. West, R. L., & Baylis, G. C. (1998). Effects of increased response domi-nance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13, 206-217. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08) 70197-7. (Pubitemid 28312315)