Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual-spatial attention?

Biological Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 58-65

  Schankin, Andrea ^a   Hagemann, Dirk ^a   Schubö, Anna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Contextual cueing; Event related potentials; N2pc

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTEXTUAL CUEING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; VISUAL SPATIAL ATTENTION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953309656     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chun M.M., Jiang Y.H. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:28-71.
2. Chun M.M., Wolfe J.M. Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 30:39-78.
3. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
4. Dukewich K.R., Klein R.M. Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 63:1-7.
5. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96:433-458.
6. Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1996, 99:225-234.
7. Eimer M., Mazza V. Neural correlates of conscious change detection. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:328-342.
8. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
9. Hopf J.M., Boelmans K., Schoenfeld A.M., Heinze H.J., Luck S.J. How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision? Evidence from magnetoencephalographic recordings. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 15:17-29.
10. Hopf J.M., Boelmans K., Schoenfeld A.M., Luck S.J., Heinze H.J. Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24:1822-1832.
11. Johnson J.S., Woodman G.F., Braun E., Luck S.J. Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:834-839.
12. Kunar M.A., Flusberg S.J., Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2007, 33:816-828.
13. Lleras A., Von Mühlenen A. Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision 2004, 17:465-482.
14. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-related Potential Technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1994, 20:1000-1014.
16. Olson I.R., Chun M.M. Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 2001, 27:1299-1313.
17. Olson I.R., Chun M.M., Allison T. Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. Brain 2001, 124:1417-1425.
18. Schankin A., Schubö A. Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:668-679.
19. Schankin A., Schubö A. Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:717-727.
20. Schubö A., Wykowska A., Müller H.J. Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity: investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Brain Research 2007, 23:136-147.
21. Wascher E., Wauschkuhn B. The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1996, 99:149-162.
22. Wolber M., Wascher E. Visual search strategies are indexed by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Biological Psychology 2003, 63:79-100.
23. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:202-238.
24. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 1999, 400:867-869.
25. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2003, 29:121-138.