Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of filtration models for non-Fickian transport and hyperexponential deposition

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 635-648

  Yuan, Hao ^a   Sin, Gürkan ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Deep bed filtration; Elliptic equation; Median heterogeneity; Particle heterogeneity; Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

DEEP BED FILTRATION; ELLIPTIC EQUATION; MEDIAN HETEROGENEITY; PARTICLE HETEROGENEITY; UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

COLLOID CHEMISTRY; COLLOIDS; EFFLUENTS; FORECASTING; GEOMETRY; GROUNDWATER; LAPLACE EQUATION; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POROUS MATERIALS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER FILTRATION;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 79953295110     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.051     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Elimelech M., Gregory J., Williams R., Jia X. Particle Deposition & Aggregation: Measurement, Modelling and Simulation (Colloid & Surface Engineering) 1998, Butterworth-Heinemann.
2. Civan F. Reservoir Formation Damage-Fundamentals, Modeling, Assessment, and Mitigation 2000, Gulf Professional Publishing.
3. Herzig J.P., Leclerc D.M., Goff P.L. Flow of suspensions through porous media-application to deep filtration. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1970, 62:8-35.
4. Cortis A., Berkowitz B. Anomalous transport in " classical" soil and sand columns. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2004, 68:1539-1548.
5. Fourar M., Radilla G. Non-Fickian description of tracer transport through heterogeneous porous media. Transport in Porous Media 2009, 80:561-579.
6. Levy M., Berkowitz B. Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2003, 64:203-226.
7. Yuan H., Shapiro A.A. Modeling non-Fickian transport and hyperexponential deposition for deep bed filtration. Chemical Engineering Journal 2010, 162:974-988.
8. Tufenkji N., Elimelech M. Breakdown of colloid filtration theory: role of the secondary energy minimum and surface charge heterogeneities. Langmuir 2005, 21:841-852.
9. Tufenkji N., Elimelech M. Deviation from the classical colloid filtration theory in the presence of repulsive DLVO interactions. Langmuir 2004, 20:10818-10828.
10. Tufenkji N., Redman J.A., Elimelech M. Interpreting deposition patterns of microbial particles in laboratory-scale column experiments. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37:616-623.
11. Bradford S.A., Simunek J., Walker S.L. Transport and straining of E. coli O157:H7 in saturated porous media. Water Resources Research 2006, 42:W12S12.
12. Yuan H., Shapiro A.A. A mathematical model for non-monotonic deposition profiles in deep bed filtration systems. Chemical Engineering Journal 2011, 166:105-115.
13. Shapiro A.A., Bedrikovetsky P.G. A stochastic theory for deep bed filtration accounting for dispersion and size distributions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2010, 389:2473-2494.
14. Cortis A., Ghezzehei T.A. On the transport of emulsions in porous media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2007, 313:1-4.
15. Cortis A., Knudby C. A continuous time random walk approach to transient flow in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resources Research 2006, 42:W10201.
16. Berkowitz B., Scher H. The role of probabilistic approaches to transport theory in heterogeneous media. Transport in Porous Media 2001, 42:241-263.
17. Dentz M., Berkowitz B. Transport behavior of a passive solute in continuous time random walks and multirate mass transfer. Water Resources Research 2003, 39:1111.
18. Shapiro A.A. Elliptic equation for random walks. Application to transport in microporous media. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2007, 375:81-96.
19. Shapiro A.A., Bedrikovetsky P.G. Elliptic random-walk equation for suspension and tracer transport in porous media. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2008, 387:5963-5978.
20. Li X., Scheibe T.D., Johnson W.P. Apparent decreases in colloid deposition rate coefficients with distance of transport under unfavorable deposition conditions: a general phenomenon. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38:5616-5625.
21. Bradford S.A., Toride N. A stochastic model for colloid transport and deposition. Journal of Environmental Quality 2007, 36:1346-1356.
22. Bradford S.A., Simunek J., Bettahar M., Van Genuchten M.T., Yates S.R. Modeling colloid attachment, straining, and exclusion in saturated porous media. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37:2242-2250.
23. Bradford S.A, Simunek J., Bettahar M., van Genuchten M.T., Yates S.R. Significance of straining in colloid deposition: evidence and implications. Water Resources Research 2006, 42:W12S15.
24. Bradford S.A., Torkzaban S., Leij F., im J., nek M.T., van Genuchten Modeling the coupled effects of pore space geometry and velocity on colloid transport and retention. Water Resources Research 2009, 45:W02414.
25. Leij F.J., Bradford S.A. Combined physical and chemical nonequilibrium transport model: analytical solution, moments, and application to colloids. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2009, 110:87-99.
26. McKay M.D, Morrison J.D., Upton S.C. Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models. Computer Physics Communications 1999, 117:44-51.
27. Helton J.C. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1993, 42:327-367.
28. Iman R.L., Helton J.C. An investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Risk Analysis 1988, 8:71-90.
29. R.L. Iman, J.C. Helton, Comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, Other information: p, 1985, pp. Medium: X; Size: Pages: 116.
30. Dawson R., Lantz R.B., CO E.P.R. Inaccessible pore volume. Polymer Flooding SPE Journal 1972, 12:448-452.
31. Bradford S.A., Bettahar M., Simunek J., Genuchten M.T.V. Straining and attachment of colloids in physically heterogeneous porous media. Vadose Zone Journal 2004, 3:384-394.
32. Sin G., Gernaey K.V., Lantz A.E. Good modeling practice for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Biotechnology Progress 2009, 25:1043-1053.
33. Sin G., Gernaey K.V., Neumann M.B., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Gujer W. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design. Water Research 2009, 43:2894-2906.
34. Helton J.C. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1997, 57:3-76.
35. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Saisana M., Tarantola S. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer 2008, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
36. Berkowitz B., Cortis A., Dentz M., Scher H. Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Reviews of Geophysics 2006, 44:RG2003.
37. Bradford S.A., Torkzaban S., Walker S.L. Coupling of physical and chemical mechanisms of colloid straining in saturated porous media. Water Research 2007, 41:3012-3024.
38. Sin G., Guisasola A., De Pauw D.J.W., Baeza J.A., Carrera J., Vanrolleghem P.A. A new approach for modelling simultaneous storage and growth processes for activated sludge systems under aerobic conditions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2005, 92:600-613.
39. Omlin M., Reichert P. A comparison of techniques for the estimation of model prediction uncertainty. Ecological Modelling 1999, 115:45-59.
40. Bates D.M., Watts D.G. Nonlinear Regression Analysis & Applications 2003, Wiley-Interscience, USA.
41. Seber G.A.F., Wild C.J. Nonlinear Regression 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Canada.
42. Steinberg H.A. GENERALIZED QUOTA SAMPLING. Nuclear Science and Engineering (U.S.) 1963, 15. Other information: Orig. Receipt Date: 31-DEC-63, (1963) Medium: X; Size: Pages: 142-145.
43. Mckay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 2000, 42:55-61.
44. Helton J.C., Davis F.J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2003, 81:23-69.
45. Iman R.L., Conover W.J. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation B 1982, 11:311-314.
46. Brun R., Kuehni M., Siegrist H., Gujer W., Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters-systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Research 2002, 36:4113-4127.
47. Brun R., Reichert P., Kuensch H.R. Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resources Research 2001, 37:1015-1030.
48. Sin G., Meyer A.S., Gernaey K.V. Assessing reliability of cellulose hydrolysis models to support biofuel process design-identifiability and uncertainty analysis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2010, 34:1385-1392.
49. Golub G.H., Loan C.F.V. Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins Studies in Mathematical Sciences) 1996, The Johns Hopkins University Press, USA.
50. Shah V., Gilbert J. Sparse matrices in Matlab *P: design and implementation. High Performance Computing-HiPC 2004 2005, 144-155.
51. de Hoog F.R., Knight J.H., Stokes A.N. An improved method for numerical inversion of laplace transforms. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1982, 3:357-366.
52. Silliman S.E., Simpson E.S. Laboratory evidence of the scale effect in dispersion of solutes in porous media. Water Resources Research 1987, 23:1667-1673.