Assessing reliability of cellulose hydrolysis models to support biofuel process design-Identifiability and uncertainty analysis

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1385-1392

  Sin, Gürkan ^a   Meyer, Anne S ^a   Gernaey, Krist V ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Cellulose hydrolysis; Design; Identifiability; Modeling; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; CORRELATED PARAMETERS; IDENTIFIABILITY; IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS; KINETIC EXPRESSION; MICHAELIS-MENTEN; MODEL PREDICTION; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; MODELING; MODELING UNCERTAINTIES; MONTE CARLO PROCEDURES; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT;

BIOFUELS; CELLULOSE; DESIGN; HYDROLYSIS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS; CELLULOSE; DESIGN; ENGINEERING; HYDROLYSIS; PROCESSES; RELIABILITY;

EID: 77953914735     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alvarado-Morales M., Terra J., Gernaey K.V., Woodley J.M., Gani R. Biorefining: Computer aided tools for sustainable design and analysis of bioethanol production. Chemical Engineering Research & Design 2009, 87:1171-1183.
2. Andersen N. (2007). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose-Experimental and modelling studies. PhD thesis. BioCentrum, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
3. Brun R., Kuhni M., Siegrist H., Gujer W., Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters-Systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Research 2002, 36:4113-4127.
4. Cardona Alzatea C.A., Sanchez Toroa O.J. Energy consumption analysis of integrated flowsheets for production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy 2006, 31:2447-2459.
5. Dochain D., Vanrolleghem P.A. Dynamical modelling and estimation in wastewater treatment processes 2001, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
6. Gan Q., Allen S.J., Taylor G. Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: An overview, an experimental study and mathematical modeling. Process Biochemistry 2003, 38:1003-1018.
7. Hayes D.J. An examination of biorefining processes, catalysts and challenges. Catalysis Today 2009, 145:138-151.
8. Helton J.C., Davis F.J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2003, 81:23-69.
9. Hoch P.M., Espinosa J. Conceptual design and simulation tools applied to the evolutionary optimization of a bioethanol purification plant. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Reasearch 2008, 47:7381-7389.
10. Holmberg A. On the practical identifiability of microbial growth models incorporating Michaelis-Menten type nonlinearities. Mathematical Biosciences 1982, 62:23-43.
11. Iman L.R., Conover W.J. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 1982, 11:311-334.
12. Kadam K.L., Rydholm E.C., McMillan J.D. Development and validation of a kinetic model for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnology Progress 2004, 20:698-705.
13. Karuppiah R., Peschel A., Grossmann I.E., Martin M., Martinson W., Zullo L. Energy optimization for the design of corn-based ethanol plants. AIChE Journal 2008, 54:1499-1525.
14. Levine S.E., Fox J.M., Blanch H.W., Clark D.S. A detailed kinetic modeling study of the kinetic slowdown of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Proceedings: AIChE 2009 Annual Meeting 2009.
15. NSF Breaking the chemical and engineering barriers to lignocellulosic biofuels: Next generation hydrocarbon biorefineries 2008, University of Massachusetts Amherst. National Science Foundation. Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Division, Washington D.C., 180 pp. G.W. Huber (Ed.).
16. Ochoa, S., Repke, J. U., Wozny, G. (in press). Integrating real-time optimization and control for optimal operation: Application to the bio-ethanol process. Biochemical Engineering Journal. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2009.01.005.
17. Okazaki M., Moo-Young M. Kinetics of enzymatic-hydrolysis of cellulose - analytical description of a mechanistic model. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1978, 20:637-663.
18. Rosgaard L., Pedersen S., Meyer A.S. Comparison of different pretreatment strategies for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat and barley straw. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2007, 143:284-296.
19. Ruano M.V., Ribes J., De Pauw D.J.W., Sin G. Parameter subset selection for the dynamic calibration of activated sludge models (ASMs): Experience versus systems analysis. Water Science and Technology 2007, 56(8):107-115.
20. Seber G., Wild C. Nonlinear regression 1989, Wiley, New York.
21. Shao X., Lynd L., Wyman C., Bakker A. Kinetic modeling of cellulosic biomass to ethanol via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Part I. Accommodation of intermittent feeding and analysis of staged reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2009, 102:59-65.
22. Sin G., Vanrolleghem P.A. Extensions to modeling aerobic carbon degradation using combined respirometric-titrimetric measurements in view of activated sludge model calibration. Water Research 2007, 41:3345-3358.
23. Sin G., Ödman P., Petersen N., Eliasson Lantz A., Gernaey K.V. Matrix notation for efficient development of first-principles models within PAT applications: Integrated modeling of antibiotic production with Streptomyces coelicolor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2008, 101:153-171.
24. Sin G., Eliasson Lantz A., Gernaey K.V. Good modelling practice (GMoP) for PAT applications: Propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Biotechnology Progress 2009, 25:1043-1053.
25. Sin G., Gernaey K.V., Neumann M.B., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Gujer W. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: A critical discussion using an example from design. Water Research 2009, 43:2894-2906.
26. Wald S., Wilke C.R., Blanch H.W. Kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1984, 26:221-230.
27. Zhang Y.-H.P., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2004, 88:797-824.