Relative contributions of strain-dependent permeability and fixed charged density of proteoglycans in predicting cervical disc biomechanics: A poroelastic C5-C6 finite element model study

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 438-445

  Hussain, Mozammil ^a   Natarajan, Raghu N ^b,c   Chaudhary, Gulafsha ^d   An, Howard S ^b   Andersson, Gunnar B J ^b  

^a LOGAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

^d Medical Residency Applicant   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical disc biomechanics; Fixed charged density of proteoglycans; Poroelastic finite element; Strain dependent permeability and porosity; Tissue swelling

Indexed keywords

CERVICAL DISC BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL DISCS; CHARGED DENSITY; DEGENERATIVE CHANGES; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; IN-VIVO; MATRIX DEFORMATION; MINIMUM VALUE; MOMENT LOAD; MOTION BEHAVIOR; PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING; POROELASTIC; PROTEOGLYCANS; RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION; STANDARD DEVIATION; STRAIN-DEPENDENT; STRAIN-DEPENDENT PERMEABILITY AND POROSITY; STRESS TRANSFER; SWELLING BEHAVIOR; SWELLING PRESSURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; THREE MODELS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; SWELLING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE;

GLYCOPROTEINS;

PROTEOGLYCAN;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELASTIC TISSUE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT STIFFNESS; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MOVEMENT; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PROTEOGLYCANS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 79953294301     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Urban J.P. The role of the physicochemical environment in determining disc cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans 2002, 30:858-864.
2. Maroudas A. Physicochemical properties of cartilage in the light of ion exchange theory. Biophys J 1968, 8:575-595.
3. Maroudas A., Bullough P. Permeability of articular cartilage. Nature 1968, 219:1260-1261.
4. Urban J.P., McMullin J.F. Swelling pressure of the intervertebral disc: influence of proteoglycan and collagen contents. Biorheology 1985, 22:145-157.
5. Urban J.P., McMullin J.F. Swelling pressure of the lumbar intervertebral discs: influence of age, spinal level, composition, and degeneration. Spine 1988, 13:179-187.
6. Broberg K. Slow deformation of intervertebral disc. J Biomech 1993, 26:501-512.
7. Sivan S., Merkher Y., Wachtel E., Ehrlich S., Maroudas A. Correlation of swelling pressure and intrafibrillar water in young and aged human intervertebral discs. J Orthop Res 2006, 24:1292-1298.
8. Armstrong C.G., Mow V.C. Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982, 64:88-94.
9. Weidenbaum M., Foster R.J., Best B.A., Saed-Nejad F., Nickoloff E., Newhouse J., et al. Correlating magnetic resonance imaging with the biochemical content of the normal human intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1992, 10:552-561.
10. Mow V.C., Mansour J.M. The nonlinear interaction between cartilage deformation and interstitial fluid flow. J Biomech 1977, 10:31-39.
11. Iatridis J.C., Setton L.A., Foster R.J., Rawlins B.A., Weidenbaum M., Mow V.C. Degeneration affects the anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of human anulus fibrosus in compression. J Biomech 1998, 31:535-544.
12. Natarajan R.N., Williams J.R., Andersson G.B. Recent advances in analytical modeling of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2004, 29:2733-2741.
13. Pooni J.S., Hukins D.W., Harris P.F., Hilton R.C., Davies K.E. Comparison of the structure of human intervertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine. Surg Radiol Anat 1986, 8:175-182.
14. Mercer S., Bogduk N. The ligaments and annulus fibrosus of human adult cervical intervertebral discs. Spine 1999, 24:619-626.
15. Skrzypiec D.M., Pollintine P., Przybyla A., Dolan P., Adams M.A. The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry. Eur Spine J 2007, 16:1701-1709.
16. Edwards W.T., Ordway N.R., Zheng Y., McCullen G., Han Z., Yuan H.A. Peak stresses observed in the posterior lateral anulus. Spine 2001, 26:1753-1759.
17. Przybyla A.S., Skrzypiec D., Pollintine P., Dolan P., Adams M.A. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending. Spine 2007, 32:1612-1620.
18. Lanir Y. Biorheology and fluid flux in swelling tissues. I. Bicomponent theory for small deformations, including concentration effects. Biorheology 1987, 24:173-187.
19. Lanir Y. Biorheology and fluid flux in swelling tissues. II. Analysis of unconfined compressive response of transversely isotropic cartilage disc. Biorheology 1987, 24:189-205.
20. Khalsa P.S., Eisenberg S.R. Compressive behavior of articular cartilage is not completely explained by proteoglycan osmotic pressure. J Biomech 1997, 30:589-594.
21. Olsen S., Oloyede A., Adam C. A finite element formulation and program to study transient swelling and load-carriage in healthy and degenerate articular cartilage. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2004, 7:111-120.
22. Simon B.R., Wu J.S., Carlton M.W., Evans J.H., Kazarian L.E. Structural models for human spinal motion segments based on a poroelastic view of the intervertebral disk. J Biomech Eng 1985, 107:327-335.
23. Laible J.P., Pflaster D.S., Krag M.H., Simon B.R., Haugh L.D. A poroelastic-swelling finite element model with application to the intervertebral disc. Spine 1993, 18:659-670.
24. Iatridis J.C., Laible J.P., Krag M.H. Influence of fixed charge density magnitude and distribution on the intervertebral disc: applications of a poroelastic and chemical electric (PEACE) model. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125:12-24.
25. Argoubi M., Shirazi-Adl A. Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. J Biomech 1996, 29:1331-1339.
26. Lee K.K., Teo E.C. Poroelastic analysis of lumbar spinal stability in combined compression and anterior shear. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004, 17:429-438.
27. Adams M.A., Hutton W.C. The effect of posture on the fluid content of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 1983, 8:665-671.
28. Simunic D.I., Broom N.D., Robertson P.A. Biomechanical factors influencing nuclear disruption of the intervertebral disc. Spine 2001, 26:1223-1230.
29. Kraemer J., Kolditz D., Gowin R. Water and electrolyte content of human intervertebral discs under variable load. Spine 1985, 10:69-71.
30. Panjabi M.M., Oxland T.R., Parks E.H. Quantitative anatomy of cervical spine ligaments. Part II. Middle and lower cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 1991, 4:277-285.
31. Yoganandan N., Kumaresan S., Pintar F.A. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122:623-629.
32. Riches P.E., Dhillon N., Lotz J., Woods A.W., McNally D.S. The internal mechanics of the intervertebral disc under cyclic loading. J Biomech 2002, 35:1263-1271.
33. Moroney S.P., Schultz A.B., Miller J.A., Andersson G.B. Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments. J Biomech 1988, 21:769-779.
34. Closkey R.F., Parsons J.R., Lee C.K., Blacksin M.F., Zimmerman M.C. Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area. Spine 1993, 18:1011-1015.
35. Patwardhan A.G., Havey R.M., Ghanayem A.J., Diener H., Meade K.P., Dunlap B., et al. Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load. Spine 2000, 25:1548-1554.
36. Keller T.S., Nathan M. Height change caused by creep in intervertebral discs: a sagittal plane model. J Spinal Disord 1999, 12:313-324.
37. Kimura S., Hesselink J.R., Garfin S.R., Kawaji Y., Hasegaa K., Hargens A.R. Axial load-dependent cervical spinal alterations during simulated upright posture: a comparison of healthy controls and patients with cervical degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 2:137-144.
38. McGill S.M., Jones K., Bennett G., Bishop P.J. Passive stiffness of the human neck in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Clin Biomech 1994, 9:193-198.
39. Miura T., Panjabi M.M., Cripton P.A. A method to simulate in vivo cervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload. Spine 2002, 27:43-48.
40. Penning L. Normal movements of the cervical spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978, 130:317-326.
41. Dvorák J., Froehlich D., Penning L., Baumgartner H., Panjabi M.M. Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension. Spine 1988, 13:748-755.
42. Lind B., Sihlbom H., Nordwall A., Malchau H. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989, 70:692-695.
43. White A.A., Panjabi M.M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine 1990, Philadelphia, PA, J.B. Lippincott Co. 2nd ed.
44. Dvorák J., Panjabi M.M., Novotny J.E., Antinnes J.A. In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res 1991, 9:828-834.
45. Dvorák J., Panjabi M.M., Grob D., Novotny J.E., Antinnes J.A. Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine 1993, 18:120-127.
46. Holmes A., Wang C., Han Z.H., Dang G.T. The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Spine 1994, 19:2505-2510.
47. Penning L., Wilmink J.T. Rotation of the cervical spine. A CT study in normal subjects. Spine 1987, 12:732-738.
48. Mimura M., Moriya H., Watanabe T., Takahashi K., Yamagata M., Tamaki T. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine with special reference to the axial rotation. Spine 1989, 14:1135-1139.
49. Iai H., Moriya H., Goto S., Takahashi K., Yamagata M., Tamaki T. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the upper cervical spine during axial rotation. Spine 1993, 18:2388-2392.
50. Ishii T., Mukai Y., Hosono N., Sakaura H., Nakajima Y., Sato Y., et al. Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 2006, 31:155-160.
51. Miyaoka S., Hirano H., Ashida I., Miyaoka Y., Yamada Y. Analysis of head movements coupled with trunk drift in healthy subjects. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005, 43:395-402.
52. Goel V.K., Clausen J.D. Prediction of load sharing among spinal components of a C5-C6 motion segment using the finite element approach. Spine 1998, 23:684-691.
53. Reilly T., Tyrrell A., Troup J.D. Circadian variation in human stature. Chronobiol Int 1984, 1:121-126.
54. Oloyede A., Broom N. Stress-sharing between the fluid and solid components of articular cartilage under varying rates of compression. Connective Tissue Res 1994, 30:127-141.
55. Wilson W., van Donkelaar C.C., Huyghe J.M. A comparison between mechano-electrochemical and biphasic swelling theories for soft hydrated tissues. J Biomech Eng 2005, 127:158-165.
56. Fujiwara A., Lim T.H., An H.S., Tanaka N., Jeon C.H., Andersson G.B., et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000, 25:3036-3044.
57. Nachemson A. Mechanical stresses on lumbar disks. Curr Pract Orthop Surg 1966, 3:208-224.
58. Linn F.C., Sokoloff L. Movement and composition of interstitial fluid of cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 1965.
59. Nissan M., Gilad I. The cervical and lumbar vertebrae-an anthropometric model. Eng Med 1984, 13:111-114.
60. Panjabi M.M., Duranceau J., Goel V., Oxland T., Takata K. Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 1991, 16:861-869.
61. Vasavada A.N., Danaraj J., Siegmund G.P. Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. J Biomech 2008, 41:114-121.
62. Kumaresan S., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A., Macias M., Cusick J.F. Morphology of young and old cervical spine intervertebral disc tissues. Biomed Sci Instrum 2000, 36:141-146.
63. Teo E.C., Ng H.W. Evaluation of the role of ligaments, facets and disc nucleus in lower cervical spine under compression and sagittal moments using finite element method. Med Eng Phys 2001, 23:155-164.
64. Kumaresan S., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A. Finite element modeling approaches of human cervical spine facet joint capsule. J Biomech 1998, 31:371-376.
65. Gu W.Y., Mao X.G., Foster R.J., Weidenbaum M., Mow V.C., Rawlins B.A. The anisotropic hydraulic permeability of human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Influence of age, degeneration, direction, and water content. Spine 1999, 24:2449-2455.
66. Best B.A., Guilak F., Setton L.A., Zhu W., Saed-Nejad F., Ratcliffe A., et al. Compressive mechanical properties of the human anulus fibrosus and their relationship to biochemical composition. Spine 1994, 19:212-221.
67. Iatridis J.C., Setton L.A., Weidenbaum M., Mow V.C. Alterations in the mechanical behavior of the human lumbar nucleus pulposus with degeneration and aging. J Orthop Res 1997, 15:318-322.
68. Iatridis J.C., Weidenbaum M., Setton L.A., Mow V.C. Is the nucleus pulposus a solid or a fluid? Mechanical behaviors of the nucleus pulposus of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 1996, 21:1174-1184.
69. Goel V.K., Clark C.R., McGowan D., Goyal S. An in-vitro study of the kinematics of the normal, injured and stabilized cervical spine. J Biomech 1984, 17:363-376.
70. Goel V.K., Clark C.R., Harris K.G., Schulte K.R. Kinematics of the cervical spine: effects of multiple total laminectomy and facet wiring. J Orthop Res 1988, 6:611-619.
71. Schulte K., Clark C.R., Goel V.K. Kinematics of the cervical spine following discectomy and stabilization. Spine 1989, 14:1116-1121.
72. Shea M., Edwards W.T., White A.A., Hayes W.C. Variations of stiffness and strength along the human cervical spine. J Biomech 1991, 24:95-107.
73. Panjabi M.M., Lydon C., Vasavada A., Grob D., Crisco J.J., Dvorak J. On the understanding of clinical instability. Spine 1994, 19:2642-2650.
74. Richter M., Wilke H.J., Kluger P., Claes L., Puhl W. Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro. Eur Spine J 2000, 9:104-108.
75. Panjabi M.M., Crisco J.J., Vasavada A., Oda T., Cholewicki J., Nibu K., et al. Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine 2001, 26:2692-2700.
76. Nightingale R.W., Carol Chancey V., Ottaviano D., Luck J.F., Tran L., Prange M., et al. Flexion and extension structural properties and strengths for male cervical spine segments. J Biomech 2007, 40:535-542.
77. Wheeldon J.A., Pintar F.A., Knowles S., Yoganandan N. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J Biomech 2006, 39:375-380.
78. Board D., Stemper B.D., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A., Shender B., Paskoff G. Biomechanics of the aging spine. Biomed Sci Instrum 2006, 42:1-6.