Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High-Andes wetlands

Ecography

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 296-305

  Declerck, Steven A J ^a,b   Coronel, Jorge S ^c   Legendre, Pierre ^d   Brendonck, Luc ^b  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSIDAD MAYOR DE SAN SIMÓN   (Bolivia)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CRUSTACEAN; DISPERSAL; DIVERSITY INDEX; EPHEMERAL POOL; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HETEROGENEITY; METAPOPULATION; PARTITIONING; PATCHINESS; PROPAGULE; SCALE EFFECT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WETLAND; ZOOPLANKTON;

ANDES;

EID: 79953292482     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06462.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Beisner, B. E. et al. 2006. Environmental productivity and biodiversity effects on invertebrate community invasibility. Biol. Invasions 8: 655-664.
2. Blanchet, F. G. et al. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89: 2623-2632.
3. Bohonak, A. J. and Jenkins, D. G. 2003. Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecol. Lett. 6: 783-796.
4. Borcard, D. and Legendre, P. 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol. Model. 153: 51-68.
5. Borcard, D. et al. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
6. Borcard, D. et al. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85: 1826-1832.
7. Coronel, J. S. et al. 2004. Temporary shallow pools in high-Andes 'bofedal' peatlands: a limnological characterization at different spatial scales. Arch. Sci. 57: 85-96.
8. Cottenie, K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 8: 1175-1182.
9. Cottenie, K. and De Meester, L. 2004. Metacommunity structure: synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. Ecology 85: 114-119.
10. Cottenie, K. et al. 2003. Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84: 991-1000.
11. Diekotter, T. et al. 2008. Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9: 298-307.
12. Dray, S. et al. 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol. Model. 196: 483-493.
13. Dray, S. et al. 2007. Packfor: forward selection with permutation (Canoco p. 46). R package ver. 0.0-7 .
14. Dumbrell, A. J. et al. 2008. Changes in species diversity following habitat disturbance are dependent on spatial scale: theoretical and empirical evidence. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1531-1539.
15. Guelat, J. et al. 2008. Mass effects mediate coexistence in competing shrews. Ecology 89: 2033-2042.
16. Holyoak, M. et al. 2005. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Univ. of Chicago Press.
17. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press.
18. Jost, L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88: 2427-2439.
19. Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5-13.
20. Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd English ed. Developments in environmental modelling 20. Elsevier.
21. Legendre, P. and Gallagher, E. D. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271-280.
22. Legendre, P. et al. 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 435-450.
23. Legendre, P. et al. 2009. PCNM. R package ver. 1.9 .
24. Legendre, P. et al. 2010. Community surveys through space and time: testing the space-time interaction in the absence of replication. Ecology 91: 262-272.
25. Leibold, M. A. and Norberg, J. 2004. Biodiversity in metacommunities: plankton as complex adaptive systems?. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49: 1278-1289.
26. Leibold, M. A. et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7: 601-613.
27. Lindo, Z. and Winchester, N. N. 2008. Scale dependent diversity patterns in arboreal and terrestrial oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) communities. Ecography 31: 53-60.
28. Loeuille, N. and Leibold, M. A. 2008. Evolution in metacommunities: on the relative importance of species sorting and monopolization in structuring communities. Am. Nat. 171: 788-799.
29. Louette, G. and De Meester, L. 2007. Predation and priority effects in experimental zooplankton communities. Oikos 116: 419-426.
30. Menge, B. A. and Olson, A. M. 1990. Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 52-57.
31. Ng, I. S. Y. et al. 2009. Hierarchical zooplankton metacommunities: distinguishing between high and limiting dispersal mechanisms. Hydrobiologia 619: 133-143.
32. Oksanen, J. et al. 2005. vegan: community ecology package. R package ver. 1.6-10 .
33. Pagui, J. C. 1995. Crustacea-Cladocera. - In: Lopretto, E. C. and Tell, G. (eds), Ecosistemas de aguas continentales: metodologias para su estudio. Ediciones Sur, pp. 909-951.
34. Pandit, S. N. et al. 2009. Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. Ecology 90: 2253-2262.
35. Peres-Neto, P. R. et al. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614-2625.
36. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna .
37. Shurin, J. B. et al. 2009. Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organisms. Oecologia 159: 151-159.
38. Smirnov, N. N. 1996. Cladocera: the Chydoridae and Sayciinae (Chydoridae) of the world. SPB/Academic Publ.
39. Stendera, S. E. S. and Johnson, R. K. 2005. Additive partitioning of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol. 50: 1360-1375.
40. Vandekerkhove, J. et al. 2004. Use of ephippial morphology to assess richness of anomodpods: potentials and pitfalls. J. Limnol. 63: 75-84.
41. Vandekerkhove, J. et al. 2005a. Uncovering hidden species: hatching diapausing eggs for the analysis of cladoceran species richness. Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 3: 399-407.
42. Vandekerkhove, J. et al. 2005b. Dormant propagule banks integrate spatio-temporal heterogeneity in cladoceran communities. Oecologia 142: 109-116.
43. Vanschoenwinkel, B. et al. 2007. The role of metacommunity processes in shaping invertebrate rock pool communities along a dispersal gradient. Oikos 116: 1255-1266.
44. Vanschoenwinkel, B. et al. 2008. Dispersal of freshwater invertebrates by large terrestrial mammals: a case study with wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Mediterranean wetlands. Freshwater Biol. 53: 2264-2273.
45. Veech, J. A. and Crist, T. O. 2009. PARTITION: software for hierarchical partitioning of species diversity, version 3.0 .
46. Veech, J. A. et al. 2002. The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99: 3-9.