Iron porphyrin dications with neutral axial ligands: DFT calculations delineate similarities with heme protein compound II intermediates

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 115, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 3642-3647

  Chamberlin, Adam C ^a   Ikezaki, Akira ^b   Nakamura, Mikio ^b,c   Ghosh, Abhik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^b TOHO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; ANTIFERROMAGNETISM; IRON COMPOUNDS; PORPHYRINS; PROTEINS;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC COUPLING; AXIAL LIGAND; CHLOROPEROXIDASE; DFT CALCULATION; DICATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS; HEME PROTEINS; IRON PORPHYRIN; LATTER COMPLEXES; LOW ENERGIES; MODEL COMPLEXES; OXO LIGANDS; TETRAPHENYL PORPHYRINS; THIOLATES;

LIGANDS;

EID: 79953277377     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: 15205207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp111109e     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 932-948
2. Groves, J. T. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 434-447
3. Shaik, S.; Cohen, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Kumar, D.; Thiel, W. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 949-1017
4. Conradie, J.; Wasbotten, I.; Ghosh, A. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 502-506
5. For the possibility of a noninnocent porphyrin in a minor species of chloroperoxidase compound II, see: Lai, W.; Chen, H.; Shaik, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 7912-7917
6. Groves, J. T.; Quinn, R.; McMurry, T. J.; Nakamura, M.; Lang, G.; Boso, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 354-360
7. Green, M. T.; Dawson, J. H.; Gray, H. B. Science 2004, 304, 1653-1656
8. Stone, K. L.; Hoffart, L. M.; Behan, R. K.; Krebs, C.; Green, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6147-6153
9. Behan, R. K.; Hoffart, L. M.; Stone, K. L.; Krebs, C.; Green, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11471-11474
10. Horner, O.; Oddou, J. L.; Mouesca, J. M.; Jouve, H. M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 477-479
11. Rovira, C. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 1820-1826
12. Hersleth, H. P.; Ryde, U.; Rydberg, P.; Görbitz, C. H.; Andersson, K. K. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 460-476
13. The compound I intermediates provide the best known examples of noninnocent porphyrin ligands in biology. For a review of the classic literature, see: Terner, J.; Palaniappan, V.; Gold, A.; Weiss, R.; Fitzgerald, M. M.; Sullivan, A. M.; Hosten, C. M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 480-501
14. The long sought-after Compound I of cytochrome P450 has just been reported: Rittle, J.; Green, M. T. Science 2010, 330, 933-937
15. Goff, H. M.; Philippi, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7567-7571
16. Nakamura, M.; Kawasaki, Y. Chem. Lett. 1996, 25, 85-86
17. Ikezaki, A.; Tukada, H.; Nakamura, M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2257-2259
18. Ghosh, A.; Taylor, P. R. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 113-124
19. Ghosh, A. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 712-724
20. DFT calculations provide an excellent description of metal- versus ligand-centered reduction in nickel hydroporphyrins: Ryeng, H.; Gonzalez, E.; Ghosh, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 15158-15173
21. DFT calculations appear to provide a good description of singlet - triplet splittings of ruthenium(IV) porphyrins: Gonzalez, E.; Brothers, P. J.; Ghosh, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 15380-15388
22. The OPTX exchange functional: Handy, N. C.; Cohen, A. J. Mol. Phys. 2001, 99, 403-412
23. The LYP correlation functional: Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. 1988, B37, 785-789
24. Conradie, J.; Ghosh, A. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 689-702
25. Swart, M. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 2057-2066
26. Conradie, M. M.; Conradie, J.; Ghosh, A. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 84-91
27. For a description of the methods used in ADF, see: Velde, G. T.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Baerends, E. J.; Guerra, C. F.; Van Gisbergen, S. J. A.; Snijders, J. G.; Ziegler, T. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 931-967
28. Walker, F. A. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M.; Smith, K. M.; Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 2000; Vol. 5, Chapter 36, pp 81 - 183.
29. Simmoneaux, G.; Hindre, F.; Le Plouzennec, M. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 823-825
30. Walker, F. A.; Nasri, H.; Turowska-Tyrk, I.; Mohanrao, K.; Watson, C. T.; Shokhirev, N. V.; Debrunner, P. G.; Scheidt, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12109-12118
31. Ghosh, A.; Gonzalez, E.; Vangberg, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 1363-1367
32. In an earlier PW91 study of this dication, we found this state to be among the lowest in energy. A plausible explanation is that the classic pure functional PW91 favors a high-valent Fe(IV) state, relative to OLYP, which may favor a more noninnocent description: Conradie, J.; Ghosh, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 6486-6490
33. Krebs, C.; Fujimori, D. G.; Walsh, C. T.; Bollinger, J. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 484-492
34. Que, L., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 493-500
35. Nam, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 522-531
36. For a review, see: Wilmot, C. M.; Davidson, V. L. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 469-474
37. Li, X.; Fu, R.; Lee, S.; Krebs, C.; Davidson, V. L.; Liu, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 8597-8600
38. Ling, Y.; Davidson, V. L.; Zhang, Y. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2936-2939
39. For a study of the low-energy spin states of FeCl corrole, see: Roos, B. O.; Veryazov, V.; Conradie, J.; Taylor, P. R.; Ghosh, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 14099-14102