A component system for broadcasting sound for research and management

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 463-466

  Farrell, Shannon L ^a   Campomizzi, Andrew J ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bird song; Broadcast system; Conspecific attraction; Heterospecific attraction; Noise; Vocal cues

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CUE; CONSPECIFIC; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HABITAT SELECTION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NOISE; RESEARCH WORK; SONG; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALIA; AVES; PASSERI;

EID: 79953235545     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.45     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ahlering, M. A., and J. Faaborg. 2006. Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: if you build it, will they come? Auk 123:301-312. (Pubitemid 43726148)
2. Betts, M. G., A. S. Hadley, N. Rodenhouse, and J. J. Nocera. 2008. Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275:2257-2263.
3. Celis-Murillo, A., J. L. Deppe, and M. F. Allen. 2009. Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition. Journal of Field Ornithology 80:64-78.
4. Dooling, R. J. 1980. Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds. Pages 261-288 in A. N. Popper & R. R. Fay, editors. Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
5. Dooling, R. J. 1982. Auditory perception in birds. Pages 95-130. in D. E. Kroodsma & E. H.Miller, editors. Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
6. Fletcher, J. R. J. 2008. Social information and community dynamics: non-arget effects from simulating social cues for management. Ecological Applications 18:1764-1773.
7. Griffith, G. E., S. A. Bryce, J. M. Omernik, J. A. Comstock, A. C. Rogers, B. Harrison, S. L. Hatch, and D. Bezanson. 2004. Ecoregions of Texas (color poster with map, descriptive text, and photographs). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA.
8. Hahn, B. A., and E. D. Silverman. 2006. Social cues facilitate habiat selection: American redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song. Biology Letters 2:337-340.
9. Hahn, B. A., and E. D. Silverman. 2007. Managing breeding forest songbirds with conspecific song playbacks. Animal Conservation 10:436-441.
10. Simons, T. R., M. W. Alldredge, K. H. Pollock, and J. M. Wettroth. 2007. Experimental analysis of the auditory detection process of avian point counts. Auk 124:986-999.
11. Ward, M. P., and S. Schlossberg. 2004. Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial songbirds. Conservation Biology 18:519-525. (Pubitemid 38459117)
12. U.S. Census Bureau 2005. 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/ 48/48099lk.html〉. Accessed 1 Sep 2006.