Cue utilization and strategy application in stable and unstable dynamic environments

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 355-364

  Osman, Magda ^a,b   Speekenbrink, Maarten ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL TASK; DYNAMIC DECISION MAKING; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; MONITORING AND CONTROL; ON DYNAMICS; UNSTABLE DYNAMICS;

DECISION MAKING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 79953212176     PISSN: 13890417     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berry D.C., Broadbent D.E. Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology 1988, 79:251-272.
2. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. NeuroReport 2001, 12:1879-1884.
3. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:635-640.
4. Brehmer B. Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica 1992, 81:211-241.
5. Broadbent D., Ashton B. Human control of a simulated economic system. Ergonomics 1978, 78:1035-1043.
6. Burns B.D., Vollmeyer R. Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55:241-261.
7. Cohen M.S., Freeman J.T., Wolf S. Meta-cognition in time stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing and correcting. Human Factors 1996, 38:206-219.
8. Diehl E., Sterman J.D. Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 62:198-215.
9. Dienes Z., Fahey R. Role of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:848-862.
10. Funke J. Microworlds based on linear equation systems: A new approach to complex problem solving and experimental results. The cognitive psychology of knowledge 1993, 313-330. Elsevier, Amsterdam. G. Strube, K.-F. Wender (Eds.).
11. Gibson F.P. Learning and transfer in dynamic decision environments. Computational and Mathematical Organizational Theory 2007, 13:39-61.
12. Gonzales C. Decision support for real-time, dynamic decision making tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2005, 96:142-154.
13. Gonzales C., Lerch J.F., Lebiere C. Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:591-635.
14. Hagmayer Y., Meder B., Osman M., Mangold S., Lagnado D. Spontaneous causal learning while controlling a dynamic system. Open Psychology Journal 2010, 3:145-162.
15. Kerstholt J.H. The effect of information cost on strategy selection in dynamic tasks. Acta Psychologica 1996, 94:273-290.
16. Kerstholt J.H., Raaijmakers J.G.W. Decision making in dynamic task environments. Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations 1997, 205-217. Rutledge, New York, NY. R. Ranyard, R.W. Crozier, O. Svenson (Eds.).
17. Lipshitz R., Strauss O. Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997, 69:149-163.
18. Lipshitz R., Klein G., Orasanu J., Salas E. Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2001, 14:332-351.
19. Osman M. Controlling uncertainty: A review of human behavior in complex dynamic environments. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:65-86.
20. Osman M. Controlling uncertainty: Learning and decision making in complex worlds 2010, Wiley-Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
21. Osman M., Wilkinson L., Beigi M., Parvez C., Jahanshahi M. The striatum and learning to control a complex system?. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2355-2363.
22. Osman, M., & Speekenbrink, M. (submitted for publication). Learning to predict vs. learning to control a dynamic environment.
23. Tschirgi J.E. Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development 1980, 51:1-10.
24. Vollmeyer R., Burns B.D., Holyoak K.J. The impact of goal specificity and systematicity of strategies on the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science 1996, 20:75-100.