Behavioural treatment programme contributes to normalization of contingent negative variation in children with migraine

Cephalalgia

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 562-572

  Siniatchkin, Michael ^a   Gerber Von Müller, Gabriele ^a   Darabaneanu, Stephani ^a   Petermann, Franz ^b   Stephani, Ulrich ^a   Gerber, Wolf Dieter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

behavioural therapy; children; contingent negative variation; habituation; Migraine

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AVERSIVE BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MIGRAINE; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PILOT STUDY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SCHOOL CHILD; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; CHILD; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 79953194820     PISSN: 03331024     EISSN: 14682982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0333102410388434     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Schoenen J., Ambrosini A., Sandor PS and Maertens de Noordhout A. Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance. Clin Neurophysiol 2003 ; 114: 955-972. (Pubitemid 36694753)
2. Schoenen J. Neurophysiological features of the migraineous brain. Neurol Sci 2006 ; 27 (Suppl 2): 77-81.
3. Birbaumer N., Elbert T., Canavan A. and Rockstroh B. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behaviour. Physiol Rev 1990 ; 70: 1-41. (Pubitemid 20037280)
4. Böcker KB, Timsit-Berthier M., Schoenen J. and Brunia CH Contingent negative variation in migraine. Headache 1990 ; 30: 604-609.
5. Kropp P. and Gerber WD Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine due to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation? Cephalalgia 1993 ; 13: 37-41. (Pubitemid 23056932)
6. Maertens de Noordhout A., Timsit-Berthier M., Timsit M. and Schoenen J. Contingent negative variation in headache. Ann Neurol 1986 ; 19: 78-80. (Pubitemid 16137984)
7. Siniatchkin M., Kirsch E., Kropp P., Stephani U. and Gerber WD Slow cortical potentials in migraine families. Cephalalgia 2000 ; 20: 881-892. (Pubitemid 32336715)
8. Siniatchkin M., Jonas A., Baki H., van Baalen A., Gerber WD and Stephani U. Developmental changes of the contingent negative variation in migraine and healthy children. J Headache Pain 2010 ; Epub ahead of print.
9. Kropp P. and Gerber WD Prediction of migraine attacks using a slow cortical potential, the contingent negative variation. Neurosci Lett 1998 ; 257: 73-76. (Pubitemid 28552891)
10. Siniatchkin M., Gerber WD, Kropp P. and Vein A. How the brain anticipates an attack: a study of neurophysiological periodicity in migraine. Funct Neurol 1999 ; 14: 69-77. (Pubitemid 29333832)
11. Siniatchkin M., Kropp P., Gerber WD and Stephani U. Migraine in childhood - are periodically occurring migraine attacks related to dynamic changes of cortical information processing? Neurosci Lett 2000 ; 279: 1-4. (Pubitemid 30026121)
12. Siniatchkin M., Gerber WD, Kropp P., Voznesenskaya T. and Vein A. Are the periodic changes of neurophysiological parameters during the pain-free interval in migraine related to abnormal orienting activity? Cephalalgia 2000 ; 20: 20-29. (Pubitemid 32250290)
13. Siniatchkin M., Averkina N., Andrasik F., Stephani U. and Gerber WD Neurophysiological reactivity before a migraine attack. Neurosci Lett 2006 ; 400: 121-124.
14. Siniatchkin M., Averkina N. and Gerber WD Relationship between precipitating agents and neurophysiological abnormalities in migraine. Cephalalgia 2006 ; 26: 457-465.
15. De Tommaso M., Guido M., Sardaro M., Serpino C., Vecchio E., De Stefano G., et al. Effects of topiramate and levetiracetam vs placebo on habituation of contingent negative variation in migraine patients. Neurosci Lett 2008 ; 442: 81-85.
16. Maertens de Noordhout A., Timsit-Berthier M., Timsit M. and Schoenen J. Effects of beta blockade on contingent negative variation in migraine. Ann Neurol 1987 ; 21: 111-112. (Pubitemid 17004156)
17. Siniatchkin M., Gerber WD and Vein A. Clinical efficacy and central mechanisms of cyclandelate in migraine: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Funct Neurol 1998 ; 13: 47-56. (Pubitemid 28194903)
18. Siniatchkin M., Andrasik F., Kropp P., Niederberger U., Strenge H., Averkina N., et al. Central mechanisms of controlled-release metoprolol in migraine: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 2007 ; 27: 1024-1032. (Pubitemid 47296024)
19. Siniatchkin M., Hierundar A., Kropp P., Kuhnert R., Gerber WD and Stephani U. Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in children with migraine: an exploratory study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2000 ; 25: 13-32. (Pubitemid 30331629)
20. Andrasik F. and Schwartz MS Behavioral assessment and treatment of pediatric headache. Behav Modification 2006 ; 30: 93-113. (Pubitemid 43075778)
21. Hermann C., Kim M. and Blanchard EB Behavioral and prophylactic pharmacological intervention studies of pediatric migraine: an exploratory metaanalysis. Pain 1995 ; 60: 239-256.
22. Penzien DB, Rains JC and Andrasik F. Behavioral management of recurrent headache: three decades of experience and empirism. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2002 ; 27: 163-181. (Pubitemid 34848001)
23. Gerber WD, Petermann F., Gerber-von Müller G., Niederberger U., Rentmeister B., Siniatchkin M. and Stephani U. MIPAS-family - Entwicklung und Evaluation eines verhaltensmedizini-schen Programms zur Behandlung kindlicher Kopfschmerzen. Verhaltenstherapie 2008 ; 18: 247-255.
24. Gerber WD, Gerber von-Müller G., Stephani U. and Petermann F. Kopfschmerzen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Das MIPAS-Family-Programm. Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2010.
25. Gerber WD, Petermann F., Gerber-von Müller G., Dollwet M., Darabaneanu S., Niederberger U., et al. MIPAS-Family - evaluation of a new multi-modal behavioral program for pediatric headaches: clinical effects and the impact on quality of life. J Headache Pain 2010 ; 11: 215-225.
26. IHS. The International Classification of Headache Disorders (2nd edn). Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 2004 ; 24: 1-160.
27. Gerber WD and Gerber-von Müller G. Chronische Kopfschmerzen. In: Petermann F, Vaitl D (eds) Ent spannungsverfahren. Das Praxishandbuch, 4th edn. Weinheim Beltz, 2005, pp. 380-393.
28. McGrath PJ, Cunningham SJ, Lascelles MA and Humphreys P. Help yourself. A treatment for migraine headaches. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1990.
29. Siniatchkin M., Kirsch E., Arslan S., Stegemann S., Gerber WD and Stephani U. Migraine and asthma in childhood: evidence for specific asymmetric parent-child interactions in migraine and asthma families. Cephalalgia 2003 ; 23: 790-802. (Pubitemid 37255420)
30. Bruns T., Praun N. and Biofeedback. Ein Handbuch für die therapeutische Praxis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002.
31. Rief W. and Birbaumer N. (Hrsg). Biofeedback. Grundlagen, Indikationen, Kommunikation, praktisches Vorgehen in der Therapie, 2 nd edn. Stuttgart: Schatauer, 2006.
32. Gratton G., Coles MG and Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983 ; 55: 468-484. (Pubitemid 13112654)
33. Petrinovich L. and Widaman KF An evaluation of statistical strategies to analyse repeated-measures data. In: Peeke HVS, Petrinovich L (eds) Habituation, sensitization and behaviour. New York: Academic Press, 1984, pp. 156-204.
34. Gomez CM, Marco J. and Grau C. Preparatory visuomotor cortical network of the contingent negative variation estimated by current density. Neuroimage 2003 ; 20: 216-224. (Pubitemid 37188511)
35. Bender S., Weisbrod M., Resch F. and Oelkers-Ax R. Stereotyped topography of different elevated contingent negative variation components in children with migraine without aura points towards a subcortical dysfunction. Pain 2007 ; 127: 221-233. (Pubitemid 46073408)
36. Bender S., Weisbrod M., Bornfleth H., Resch F. and Oelkers-Ax R. How do children prepare to react? Imaging maturation of motor preparation and stimulus anticipation by late contingent negative variation. Neuroimaging 2005 ; 27: 737-752. (Pubitemid 41317244)
37. Nestoriuc Y., Rief W. and Martin A. Meta-analysis of biofeedback of tension-type headache: efficacy, specificity, and treatment moderators. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008 ; 76: 379-396. (Pubitemid 351822339)
38. Grazzi L., Andrasik F., D'Amico D., Leone M., Moschia F. and Bussone G. Electromyographic biofeedback-assisted relaxation training in juvenile episodic tension-type headache: clinical outcome at three-year follow-up. Cephalalgia 2001 ; 21: 798-803. (Pubitemid 34621524)
39. Bussone G., Grazzi L., D'Amico D., Leone M. and Andrasik F. Biofeedback-assisted relaxation training for young adolescents with tension-type headache: a controlled study. Cephalalgia 1998 ; 18: 463-467. (Pubitemid 28459462)
40. Passchier J. and Helm-Hylkema H. The effect of stress imagery on arousal and its implications for biofeedback of the frontalis muscles. Biofeedback Self Regul 1981 ; 6: 295-303.
41. Morrill B. and Blanchard EB Two studies of the potential mechanisms of action in the thermal biofeedback treatment of vascular headache. Headache 1989 ; 29: 169-176. (Pubitemid 20381934)
42. Nagai Y., Critchey HD, Rothwell JC, Duncan JS and Trimble MR Changes in cortical potential associated with modulation of peripheral sympathetic activity in patients with epilepsy. Psychosom Med 2009 ; 71: 84-92.
43. Arena JG, Blanchard EB, Andreasik F., Appelbaum K. and Myers PE Psychophysiological comparisons of three kinds of headache subjects during and between headache states: analysis of post-stress adaptation periods. J Psychosom Res 1985 ; 29: 427-441. (Pubitemid 15229889)
44. Ellertsen B., Nordby H., Hammerborg D. and Thorlacius S. Psychophysiologic response patterns in migraine before and after temperature biofeedback: prediction of treatment outcome. Cephalalgia 1987 ; 7: 109-124.
45. Jensen R., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A. and Olesen J. Quantitative surface EMG of pericranial muscles in headache. A population study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994 ; 93: 335-344. (Pubitemid 24314981)
46. Oksanen A., Pöyhönen T., Ylinen JJ, Metsähonkala L., Anttila P., Laimi K., et al. Force production and EMG activity of neck muscles in adolescent headache. Disabil Rehabil 2008 ; 30: 231-239. (Pubitemid 351167284)
47. Bartsch T. Migraine and the neck: new insights from basic data. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2005 ; 9: 191-196. (Pubitemid 40873172)
48. Wickramasekera I. How does biofeedback reduce clinical symptoms and do memories and beliefs have biological consequences? Toward a model of mind-body healing. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 1999 ; 24: 91-105. (Pubitemid 29529962)