Prosodic conditioning of phonetic detail in German plosives

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-155

  Kuzla, Claudia ^a,b   Ernestus, Mirjam ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953185678     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allen J.S., Miller J.L. Effects of syllable-initial voicing and speaking rate on the temporal characteristics of monosyllabic words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 106:2031-2039.
2. van Alphen P.M., Smits R. Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: The role of prevoicing. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:455-491.
3. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412.
5. Bates D.M. Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 2005, 5:27-30.
6. Bauer L. Lenition revisited. Journal of Linguistics 2008, 44:605-624.
7. Beckman M.E., Edwards J., Fletcher J. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. Papers in laboratory phonology II 1992, 68-86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.J. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
8. Berinstein A.E. A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 1979, 47:1-59.
9. Boersma P. PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001, 5:341-345.
10. Bombien L., Mooshammer C., Hoole P., Kühnert B. Prosodic and segmental effects on EPG contact patterns of word-initial German clusters. Journal of Phonetics 2010, 38:388-403.
11. Butcher A. Coarticulation in intervocalic voiceless plosives and fricatives in connected speech. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK) 1977, 8:154-212.
12. Byrd D., Choi S. At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics-The interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. Laboratory phonology 10 2010, 31-59. De Gruyter, Berlin. C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D'Imperio, N. Vallée (Eds.).
13. Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2000). Temporal marking of accents and boundaries (LOT series 32). Ph.D. dissertation, Amsterdam.
14. Chatterjee S., Hadi A.S., Price B. Regression analysis by example 2000, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
15. Cho T. Prosodically-conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:141-176.
16. Cho T. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a, i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 33:121-157.
17. Cho T., Jun S.-A. Domain-initial strengthening as featural enhancement: Aerodynamic evidence from Korean. Chicago Linguistic Society 2000, 36:31-44.
18. Cho T., Keating P. Articulatory and acoustic studies of domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 2001, 29:155-190.
19. Cho T., Keating P. Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:466-485.
20. Cho T., McQueen J.M. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 2005, 33:121-157.
21. Choi, H. (2003). Prosody-induced acoustic variation of English stop consonants. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 2661-2664), Barcelona, Spain.
22. Cole J., Kim H., Choi H., Hasegawa-Johnson M. Prosodic effects on acoustic cues to stop voicing and place of articulation: Evidence from Radio News speech. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:180-209.
23. Crystal T.H., House A.S. Segmental durations in connected speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 83:1553-1573.
24. Dalgaard P. Introductory statistics with R 2002, Springer, New York.
25. Ernestus M., Lahey M.F., Verhees F., Baayen R.H. Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 120:1040-1051.
26. Farnetani, E., & Vayra, M. (1996). The role of prosody in the shaping of articulation in Italian CV syllables. In Proceedings of the first ESCA workshop on speech production modeling, fourth speech production seminar, 9-12, 1996, Autrans, France.
27. Féry C. German intonation patterns 1993, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
28. Fischer-Jørgensen E. Some data on North German stops and affricates. Annual Report Institute for Phonetics University Copenhagen (ARIPUC) 1976, 10:149-200.
29. Fougeron, C. (1998). Variations articulatoires en début de constituants prosodiques de different niveaux en français. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris III.
30. Fougeron C. Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics 2001, 29:109-135.
31. Fougeron C., Keating P.A. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 101:3728-3740.
32. Fox A. The prosodic hierarchy in German. Das unsichtbare Band der Sprache. Studies in German Language and Linguistic History in Memory of Leslie Seiffert 1993, 455-481. Heinz, Stuttgart. J.L. Flood, P. Salmer, O. Sayce, C. Wells (Eds.).
33. Fuchs S. Articulatory correlates of the voicing contrast in alveolar obstruent production in German. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 2005, 41.
34. Grabe, E. (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. (MPI Series in Psycholinguistics, 7). Ph.D. dissertation, Nijmegen.
35. Halle M., Stevens K. A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly Progress Report 1971, 101:198-212.
36. Jessen M. Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German 1998, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
37. Jessen M. Phonetic implementation of the distinctive auditory features [voice] and [tense] in stop consonants. Distinctive feature theory 2001, 237-294. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. T.A. Hall (Ed.).
38. Jessen M., Ringen C. Laryngeal features in German. Phonology 2002, 19:189-218.
39. de Jong K. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97:491-504.
40. Jun S.-A. The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 1998, 15:189-226.
41. Keating P.A. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 1984, 60:286-319.
42. Keating P.A., Cho T., Fougeron C., Hsu C.-S. Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. Papers in laboratory phonology VI 2003, 145-163. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Local, R. Ogden, R. Temple (Eds.).
43. Kohler K.J. The production of plosives. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik der Universität Kiel (AIPUK) 1977, 8:30-110.
44. Kohler K.J. Dimensions in the perception of fortis and lenis plosives. Phonetica 1979, 36:332-343.
45. Kohler K.J. F0 in the production of lenis and fortis plosives. Phonetica 1982, 39:199-218.
46. Kohler K.J. Phonetic explanation in phonology. The feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica 1984, 41:150-174.
47. Kohler K.J. Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen 1995, Erich Schmidt, Berlin. 2nd edition.
48. Kuzla C., Cho T., Ernestus M. Prosodic strengthening of German fricatives in duration and assimilatory devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 2007, 35:301-320.
49. Kuzla C., Ernestus M., Mitterer H. Compensation for assimilatory devoicing and prosodic structure in German fricative perception. Laboratory phonology 10 2010, 731-757. De Gruyter, Berlin. C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D'Imperio, N. Vallée (Eds.).
50. Lisker L. "Voicing" in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 1986, 29:3-11.
51. Nakai S., Kunnari S., Turk A., Suomi K., Ylitalo R. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 2009, 37:29-45.
52. Nespor M., Vogel I. Prosodic phonology 1986, Foris, Dordrecht.
53. Peterson G., Lehiste I. Duration of syllabic nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1960, 32:693-703.
54. Pierrehumbert J., Talkin D. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. Papers in laboratory phonology II 1992, 90-117. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.J. Docherty, D.R. Ladd (Eds.).
55. de Pijper J.R., Sanderman A.A. On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 96:2037-2047.
56. Piroth H.G., Janker P.M. Speaker-dependent differences in voicing and devoicing of German obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:81-109.
57. Selkirk E. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure 1984, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. Selkirk E. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1986, 3:371-405.
59. Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Turk A.E. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1996, 25:193-247.
60. Slis I.H., Cohen A. On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction II. Language and Speech 1969, 12(80-102):137-155.
61. Tabain M. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: Acoustic results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:516-530.
62. Tabain M. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: Articulatory results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:2834-2849.
63. Turk A., Sawusch J.R. The domain of accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 1997, 25:25-41.
64. Turk A., Nakai S., Sugahara M. Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: A practical guide. Methods in empirical prosody research 2006, Vol. 3:1-28. De Gruyter (=Language, Context, and Cognition, Berlin, New York.
65. Ülzmann, N. (2007). Eine experimentalphonetische Analyse des intervokalischen /t-d/ Kontrastes im Norddeutschen. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Kiel University.
66. Wightman C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P.J. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91:1707-1717.