Environmental scenarios and local-global level of community engagement: Environmental justice, jams, institutions and innovation

Futures

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 413-423

  Larsen, Katarina ^a   Gunnarsson Östling, Ulrika ^a   Westholm, Erik ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 79953162951     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Larsen K., Gunnarsson-Östling U. Climate change scenarios and citizen-participation: mitigation and adaptation perspectives in constructing sustainable futures. Habitat International 2009, 33(3):260-266.
2. Gunnarsson-Östling U., Larsen K. Climate change scenarios and behavioural change: navigating between heuristics of deliberative planning and astroturfing. Paper presented at the UK-Ireland Planning Research Conference 2008: Sustainability, Space and Social Justice 2008.
3. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-160.
4. Shove E. Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy 2003, 26(4):395-418.
5. Scott R.W. Institutions and Organizations 2001, Sage Publications.
6. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83(2):340-363.
7. Hertin J., Berkhout F. Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: the case of EU Enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 2003, 5(1):39-56.
8. Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications, Government Offices of Sweden Regional Growth Policy, Produced by the Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications, October 2007 Article No. N7035 2007, Also available online: http://www.sweden.gov.se/content/1/c6/09/09/41/6e723b7d.pdf, accessed 10 November 2009.
9. Owens S., Driffill L. How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy 2008, 36:4412-4418.
10. Shaw A., Shepard S., Burch S., Flanders D., Wiek A., Carmichael J., Robinson J., Cohen S. Making local futures tangible-synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:447-453.
11. UNFPA State of World Population 2007: Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth 2008, Online: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/presskit/pdf/sowp2007_eng.pdf, accessed 12 August 2008.
12. Myers D., Kitsuse A. Constructing the future in planning: a survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2000, 19:221-231.
13. Larsen K., Höjer M. Technological innovation and transformation perspectives in environmental futures studies for transport and mobility. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 2007, 3(1):95-115.
14. UNEP and UN-HABITAT Climate Change, The Role of Cities: Involvement, Influence, Implementation 2005, Online: http://www.unhabitat.org/list.asp?typeid=15&catid=550, accessed 15 August 2008.
15. Habitat Debate 12, No.4 A New Start: The Paradox of Crisis 2006.
16. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge.
17. C-CIARN Adapting to Climate Change, An introduction for Canadian Municipalities 2006, Online: http://waterresources.c-ciarn.ca/pdf/adaptations_e.pdf, accessed 15 August 2008.
18. ESPACE ESPACE-Planning in a Changing Climate: The Strategy & Supporting Evidence CD-ROM, Putting Adaptation at the Heart of Spatial Planning 2008, Online: http://www.espace-project.org/part1/publications/ESPACE%20Stategy%20Final.pdf, accessed 15 August 2008.
19. Agyeman J. Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice 2005, New York University Press, New York.
20. Harvey D. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference 1996, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
21. White R. Crimes Against Nature: Environmental Criminology and Ecological Justice 2008, Willan Publishing, Devon.
22. Turner R.L., Wu D.P. Environmental Justice and Environmental Racism: An Annotated Bibliography and General Overview, Focusing on U.S. literature, 1996-2002 2002, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley.
23. Haughton G. Environmental justice and the sustainable city. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1999, 18:233-243.
24. The Stockholm Environmental Programme 2008-2011, Online , accessed 12 November 2009. http://miljobarometern.stockholm.se/content/docs/mp/miljoprogram2008_eng.pdf.
25. Campbell H. Just planning: the art of situated ethical judgement. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2006, 26:92-106.
26. Bradley K., Gunnarsson-Östling U., Isaksson K. Exploring environmental justice in Sweden-how to improve planning for environmental sustainability and social equity in an " eco-friendly" context. Projections, MIT Journal of Planning 2008, 8:68-81.
27. Arrow K., Bolin B., Costanza R., Dasgupta P., Folke C., Holling C.S., Jansson B.-O., Levin S., Maler K.-G., Perrings C., Pimenteler D. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 1995, 268:520-521.
28. Jacobson M.Z., Delucchi M.A. Powering a green planet: sustainable energy, made interactive, a special rich-media presentation of the feature " A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030" November 2009 Issue of Scientific American 2009, Online: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-path-to-sustainable-energy-by-2030, accessed 6 November 2009.
29. Rockström J., et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461:472-475.
30. Hendriks C.M., Dryzek J.S., Hunold C. Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation. Political Studies 2007, 55:362-383.
31. van de Kerkhof M., Wieczorek A. Learning and stakeholder participation processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2005, 72:733-747.
32. Börjeson L., Höjer M., Dreborg K.-H., Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures 2006, 38:723-739.
33. Adger W.N. Governing natural resources: institutional adaptation and resilience. Negotiating Environmental Change-New Perspectives from Social Science 2003, 193-208. Edward Elgar. F. Berkhout, M. Leach, I. Scones (Eds.).
34. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1973, 4:1-23.
35. Smit B., Wandel J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 2006, 16:282-292.
36. Folke C. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 2006, 16:253-267.
37. Connelly S., Richardson T. Effective policy-making in the uplands: a case study in the Peak District National Park. Drivers of Environmental Change in Uplands 2009, 376-392. Routledge, London. A. Bonn, T. Allott, K. Hubacek, J. Stewart (Eds.).
38. Healey P. New partnerships in planning and implementing future-oriented development in European metropolitan regions. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung Helft 2000, 11/12:745-750.
39. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review 1995, 20.3:571-610.
40. Andersson J. Choosing futures: Alva Myrdal and the construction of Swedish futures studies, 1967-1972. International Review of Social History 2006, 51:277-295.
41. Schöll R., Binder C. Comparing system visions of farmers and experts. Futures 2009, 41:631-649.
42. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Dreborg K.-H., Eenkhorn B.R., Engström R., Falkena H.J., Gatersleben B., et al. Images of Everyday Life in the Future Sustainable City: Experiences of Back-casting with Stakeholders in five European Cities, fms-report 182 2003, Division of Environmental Strategies Research, KTH-The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
43. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Eriksson B., Henriksson G. Stakeholders and Consumption in the Five Cities, Swedish National Report, Deliverable No. 6, ToolSust, Fms-report 173 September 2001.
44. Street P. Scenario workshops: a participatory approach to sustainable urban living?. Futures 1997, 29(2):139-158.
45. The Municipality of Finspång's Official Website, Online: , accessed 10 November 2009. http://www.finspong.se/templates/Page.aspx?id=5180.
46. Finspång Finspång-'ovanligt mycket energi', Förslag till energiplan för Finspångs kommun 2008, Online: http://www.finspong.se/upload/nyheter/finspong.se/energiplan-förslag-2008-01-29.pdf, accessed 10 November 2009.
47. Björklund, A., Finnveden, G., Dreborg, K.-H., Johansson, J., Mårtensson, A., Stenlund, J., Viklund, P., Wiklund, H. (2007) Energiplanering med strategisk miljöbedömning i Finspång, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Forskningsrapport nr 2007:05, Rapport nr 2 från MiST-programmet.
48. Wiklund H., Viklund P. Public deliberation in strategic environmental assessment: an experiment with citizens juries in energy planning. Effective Environmental Assessment Tools-Critical Reflections on Concept and Practice 2006, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Research report No. 2006:03, Report No 1 from the MiST-programme. L. Emmelin (Ed.).
49. Ernstson H., Sörlin S., Elmqvist T. Social movements and ecosystem services-the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 2008, 13(2):39. Online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39, accessed 11 November 2009.
50. Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2000, 14(3):137-158.
51. The Commons in the New Millennium, Politics, Science and the Environment Series 2003, The MIT Press. N. Dolsak, E. Ostrom (Eds.).
52. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity 2005, Princeton University Press.
53. Ernstson H., Sörlin S. Weaving protective stories: connective practices to articulate holistic values in the Stockholm National Urban Park. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41:1460-1479.
54. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Dreborg K.-H., Moll H.C., Padovan D. Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 2008, 40:34-46.
55. Chilvers J. Deliberating competence-theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Science, Technology & Human Values 2008, 33(3):421-451.
56. Stevenson T. Will our futures look different, now?. Futures 2000, 32:91-102.
57. Habitat Jam Knowledge Gallery at the Global Dialogue Center 2005, Online: http://www.globaldialoguecenter.com/exhibits/backbone/index.shtml, accessed 30 July 2009.
58. Westholm E. Internet får innovationerna att flöda (English translation: Internet makes innovation flow). Institute for Futures Studies newsletter Framtider 2008, 1:37-38.
59. Larsen K., Persson L.-O. Innovation Systems and the Periphery, ISP-Final report to the Nordic Innovation Centre-Case Studies from Region Dalarna in Sweden 2005.
60. Amcoff J., Westholm E. Understanding rural change-demography as a key to the future. Futures 2007, 39(4):363-379.
61. Jessop B. The Future of the Capitalist State 2002, Polity, Cambridge.
62. Brenner N. New State Spaces, Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
63. The Covenant of Mayors, Online: , accessed 10 November 2009. http://www.eumayors.eu/.
64. Monni S., Raes F. Multilevel climate policy: the case of the European Union, Finland and Helsinki. Environmental Science and Policy 2008, 11:743-755.
65. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968, 162(3859):1243-1248.
66. Giddens A. The Politics of Climate Change 2009, Polity Press.
67. Gertler M.S. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context-or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 2003, 3:75-99.
68. Wilsdon J., Willis R. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream 2004, Demos, London.
69. Stirling A. " Opening up" and " Closing down" power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 2008, 33(2):262-294.
70. Klein R.J.T., et al. Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 745-777. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).