Generating complex clinical documents using structured entry and reporting

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 683-687

  Rosenbloom, S Trent ^a   Kiepek, Wendy ^a   Belletti, John ^b   Adams, Perry ^a   Johnson, Kevin B ^a   Shuxteau, Kiki ^a   Elkin, Peter L ^c   Shultz, Edward K ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized; Efficiency; Medical Records Systems; Structured Entry and Reporting

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COMPUTERIZED; INHERENT COMPLEXITY; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS; PATIENT HISTORY; REPORTING TOOLS; STRUCTURED ENTRY AND REPORTING; COMPARATIVES STUDIES; REPORTING; STRUCTURED ENTRY; SUB-SECTIONS;

EFFICIENCY;

ADOPTION; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOCUMENTATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL HISTORY; MEDICAL RECORD; PHYSICIAN;

EID: 79953086046     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-683     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Using Information Technology. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: IOM;2001.
2. Committee on Improving the Patient Record. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care, 2 ed. Washington, D.C.: IOM; 1991.
3. Use of a data-based approach by a health maintenance organization to identify and address physician barriers to pediatric vaccination-California, 1995; 1996.
4. Tsui FC, Espino JU, Wagner MM, Gesteland P, Ivanov O, Olszewski RT, et al. Data, network, and application: technical description of the Utah RODS Winter Olympic Biosur-veillance System. ProcAMIA Symp 2002:815-9.
5. Kahn CE, Jr., Huynh PN. Knowledge representation for platform-independent structured reporting. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:478-82.
6. Yoder JW, Schultz DF, Williams BT. The MEDIGATE graphical user interface for entry of physical findings: design principles and implementation. Medical Examination Direct Iconic and Graphic Augmented Text Entry System. J MedSyst 1998;22(5):325-37.
7. CORI: Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative. In. p. http://www.cori.org.
8. Lum F, Schein O, Schachat AP, Abbott RL, Hoskins HD, Jr., Steinberg EP. Initial two years of experience with the AAO National Eyecare Outcomes Network (NEON) cataract surgery database. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(4):691-7.
9. Stead WW, Brame RG, Hammond WE, Jelovsek FR, Estes EH, Parker RT. A computerized obstetric medical record. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49(4):502-9.
10. Slack WV, Hicks GP, Reed CE, Van Cura LJ. A computer-based medical-history system. N Engl J Med 1966;274(4): 194-8.
11. Johnson KB, Cowan J. dictate: a computer-based documentation tool for guideline-based care. J Med Syst 2002;26(1):47-60.
12. Kahn CE, Jr. Self-documenting structured reports using open information standards. Medinfo 1998;9(pt l):403-7.
13. Slack WV, Peckham BM, Van Cura LJ, Carr WF. A computer-based physical examination system. Jama 1967;200(3):224-8.
14. Stead WW, Heyman A, Thompson HK, Hammond WE. Computer-assisted interview of patients with functional headache. Arch Intern Med 1972;129(6):950-5.
15. Stead WW, Hammond WE, Estes EH. Evaluation of an audio mode of the automated medical history. Methods Inf M?tfl977;16(1):20-3.
16. Hammond WE. How the past teaches the future: ACMI distinguished lecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8(3):222-34.
17. Ledley RS. Computer aids to medical diagnosis. Jama 1966;196(11):933-43.
18. Barnett GO. COSTAR, a computer-based medical information system for ambulatory care. Proc IEEE 1979;67:1226-1237.
19. Stratmann WC, Goldberg AS, Haugh LD. The utility for audit of manual and computerized problem-oriented medical record systems. Health ServRes 1982;17(1):5-26.
20. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 2003;30(1): 167-78. [21JCORI: Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative Publications List. In. p. http://cori.ohsu.edu.
21. Wirtschafter DD, Scalise M, Henke C, Gams RA. Do information systems improve the quality of clinical research? Results of a randomized trial in a cooperative multi-institutional cancer group. Comput Biomed Res 1981;14(1):78-90.
22. Shortliffe EH. Update on ONCOCIN: a chemotherapy advisor for clinical oncology. Med Inform (Lond) 1986;11(1):19-21.
23. Musen MA, Carlson RW, Fagan LM, Deresinski SC, Short-liffe EH. T-HELPER: automated support for community-based clinical research. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1992:719-23.
24. McDonald CJ. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4(3):213-21.
25. Poon AD, Fagan LM, Shortliffe EH. The PEN-Ivory project: exploring user-interface design for the selection of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996;3(2): 168-83.
26. Evans DA, Cimino JJ, Hersh WR, Huff SM, Bell DS. Toward a medical-concept representation language. The Canon Group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994;1(3):207-17.
27. ISO/TS 17117:2002(E): Health Informatics-Controlled health terminology-Structure and high-level indicators: Technical Commitee ISO/TC 215, Health Informatics', 2002.
28. 1995 Documentation Guidelines For Evaluation & Management Services. In: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
29. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations, pp 204-251. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.
30. Neilson J. Usability Engineering, pp 23-48. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 1993.