Making metacognition explicit: Developing a theoretical foundation for metacognitive prompting during scenario-based training

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2010, Pages 2233-2237

  Fiore, Stephen ^a   Vogel Walcutt, Jennifer J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE PROCESS; ADVANCED SCENARIOS; COMPREHENSION PROCESS; INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY; LEARNING SCIENCE; LONG LINE; METACOGNITION; METACOGNITIVES; MULTIDIMENSIONAL NATURE; SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; TRAINING INTERVENTION;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PERSONNEL TRAINING;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 79953075437     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829370265889     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe, & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Reiner, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Rhodenizer, L., Salas, E., & Bowers, C. A. (1998). A framework for understanding pre-practice conditions and their impact on learning. Personnel Psychology, 51, 291-320.
4. Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., & Oser, R. L. (2002). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments. Instructional Science. 30, 433-464. (Pubitemid 37132892)
5. Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., Bowers, C. A., & Salas, E. (2004). Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 225-241.
6. Fiore, S. M., Hoffman, R. R., & Salas, E. (2008). Learning and performance across disciplines: An epilogue for moving multidisciplinary research towards an interdisciplinary science of expertise. Military Psychology, 20, S1, S155-S170.
7. Fiore, S. M., Jentsch, F., Becerra-Fernandez, I., Salas, E. & Finkelstein, N. (2005). Integrating field data with laboratory training research to improve the understanding of expert human-agent teamwork. IEEE Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA.
8. Fiore, S. M., Johnston, J., & McDaniel, R. (2005). Applying the Narrative Form and XML Metadata to Debriefing Simulation-based Exercises. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9. th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10. Metcalf, D. S. (2006). mLearning: Mobile Learning and Performance in the Palm of your Hand, Amherst, MA: HRD Press Inc.
11. Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary: Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
12. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
13. Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Zeisig, R. L., Acton, B. & McPherson, J. (1998). Team dimensional training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271-312). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Tannenbaum, S.I., Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Behson, S.J. (1998). Training team leaders to facilitate team learning and performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers and E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 247-70.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., Erez, M., & Weiss-Meilik, A. (2007). Briefing-debrieifing: Using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. Human Resource Management, 46, 1, 115-142.