User experience evaluation criteria for mobile news making technology - Findings from a case study

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 152-159

  Väätäjä, Heli ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Journalism; Mobile phone; News; User experience; Work

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EVALUATION CRITERIA; JOURNALISM; MAKING TECHNOLOGY; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; NEWS; ONLINE PUBLICATIONS; PROFESSIONAL IMAGE; SMART PHONES; USER EXPERIENCE; WORK;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MOBILE PHONES; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELEPHONE; TELEPHONE SETS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 79953071203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1952222.1952252     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Brandtzæk, P,B., Følstad, A., Heim, J. Enjoyment: Lessons from Karasek. In Blythe, M.A., Monk, A.F., Overbeeke, K., Wright, P.C. (eds). Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (2003), 55-65.
2. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press, NY (1998).
3. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., and Clarkson, P. J. Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25 (2004), 547-577.
4. Davis, F.D. Jr., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 8 (1989), 982-1003.
5. Demir, E., Desmet P.M.A., and Hekkert, P. Appraisal Patterns of Emotions in Human-Product Interaction. Int. J. of Design, 3, 2 (2009), 41-51.
6. Desmet, P., and Hekkert, P. Framework of product experience. Int. J. of Design, 1, 1 (2007), 57-66.
7. Forlizzi, J. and Ford, S. The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers. In Proc. of DIS '00. ACM (2000), 419-423.
8. Forsberg, K. 1999. Navigating in the NewsSpace. In Proc. of CSCWD99. 329-336.
9. Harbich, S. and Hassenzahl, M. Beyond Task Completion in the Workplace: Execute, Engage, Evolve, Expand. In Affect and Emotion in HCI, Peter, C. and Beale, R. (Eds.), LNCS 4868 (2008), 154-162.
10. Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., de Angeli, A. Towards a Theory of User Judgment and User Interface Quality. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 15, 4 (2008), 15:1-15:30.
11. Hassenzahl, M. The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between users and product. In Funology: From usability to enjoyment, M.A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A.F. Monk, P.C. Wright, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2003.
12. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., and Göritz, A. Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22 (2010), 353-362.
13. Hassenzahl, M., Schöbel, M. and Trautmann, T. How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus. Interacting with Computers, 20 (2008), 473-479.
14. Hassenzahl, M., and Tractinsky, N. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25, 2 (2006), 91-97. (Pubitemid 43065340)
15. Isleifsdottir, J. and Larusdottir, M. Measuring the User Experience of a Task Oriented Software. In Proc. of VUUM, IRIT (2008), 97-102.
16. Jokela, T., Väätäjä, H., and Koponen, T. Mobile Journalist Toolkit: a field study on producing news articles with a mobile device. In Proc. of MindTrek '09. ACM (2009), 45-52.
17. Mahlke, S., and Thüring, M. Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM (2007), 915-918. (Pubitemid 47581679)
18. Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd Ed. Sage Publications, USA, (1994).
19. Norros, L., Savioja, P. User experience in the systems usability approach. Proc. of VUUM2008, IRIT (2008), 45-48.
20. Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 1 (2000), 68-78.
21. Sauro, J. and Dumas, J.S. Comparison of Three One- Question, Post-Task Usability Questionnaires. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 1599-1608.
22. Schrepp, M., Held, T., and Laugwitz, B. The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software. Interacting with Computers, 18 (2006), 1055-1069. (Pubitemid 44428161)
23. Venkatesh, V. Morris, M.G. Davis, G.B., and Davis F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), 425-478.
24. Yi, M.Y, Jackson, J.D., Park, J.S., Probst, J.C. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management, 42 (2006), 350-363. (Pubitemid 43333006)
25. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research - Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Sage Publications, USA (2003).
26. Zhang, D. and Adipat, B. Challenges, Methodologies, and Issues in the Usability Testing of Mobile Applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 18, 3 (2005), 293-308. (Pubitemid 40952456)