Revisiting IT governance in the light of institutional theory

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Jacobson, Dax D ^a  

^a BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL THEORIES; IT GOVERNANCES;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 63349110665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.374     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Ahituv, N., Neumann, S., & Zviran, M. (1989). Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources. MIS Quarterly, 13(4), 388.
2. Ang, S., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). Strategic Responses to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing. Organization Science, 8(3), 235-256.
3. Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (1998). Production and Transaction Economies and IT Outsourcing: A Study of the U.S. Banking Industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535-552.
4. Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2004). A Transaction Cost Model of IT Outsourcing. Information & Management, 41(7), 921-932.
5. Boynton, A. C., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Information Technology Planning in the 1990's: Directions for Practice and Research. MIS Quarterly, 11(1), 58-72.
6. Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2005). Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research. Communications of AIS, 2005(15), 696-712.
7. Brown, C. V. (1997). Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence from a Single Case Site. Information Systems Research, 8(1), 69.
8. Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1994). Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 371.
9. Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1998). Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function. Organization Science, 9(2), 176.
10. Clark, T. D. (1992). Corporate Systems Management: An Overview and Research Perspective. Communications of the ACM, 35(2).
11. Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 11, 386-405.
12. Dahlberg, T., & Kivijarvi, H. (2006). An integrated framework for IT governance and the development and validation of an assessment instrument. Paper presented at the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
13. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory, in L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 3-22.
14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
15. Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1982). Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence. MIS Quarterly, 6(3), 55-68.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
17. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Garrity, J. T. (1963). Top Management and Computer Profits. Harvard Business Review, 41(4), 6-174.
19. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
20. Grant, G., Brown, A., Uruthirapathy, A., & McKnight, S. (2007). An Extended Model of IT Governance: A Conceptual Proposal. Paper presented at the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems.
21. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054.
22. Hawley, A. (1968). Human Ecology. New York: Macmillan.
23. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
24. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.
25. Loh, L. (1994). An Organizational-Economic Blueprint for Information Technology Outsourcing: Concepts and Evidence. Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, Canada.
26. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
27. Oh, W. (2005). Why Do Some Firms Outsource IT More Aggressively Than Others? The Effects of Organizational Characteristics on IT Outsourcing Decisions. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
28. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
29. Olson, M. H., & Chervany, N. L. (1980). The Relationship between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function. MIS Quarterly, 4(2), 57.
30. st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
31. Peterson, R. A. (2004). Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance. In Strategies for Information Technology Governance (pp. 37-80). London: Idea Group.
32. Peterson, R. R., O'Callaghan, R., & Ribbers, P., M.A. (2000). Information Technology Governance by Design: Investigating Hybrid Configurations and Integration Mechanisms. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Australia.
33. Peterson, R. R., Parker, M. M., & Ribbers, P., M.A. (2002). Information Technology Governance Processes Under Environmental Dynamism: Investigating Competing Theories of Decision Making and Knowledge Sharing. Paper presented at the Twenty-Third International Conference on Information Systems.
34. Ridley, G., Young, J., & Carroll, P. (2004). COBIT and its Utilization: A framework from the literature. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
35. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261.
36. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2000). Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era-A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research. Information Systems Research, 11(2), 105.
37. Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
38. Scott, W. R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
39. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Tavakolian, H. (1989). Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 308-317.
41. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Tuttle, B., & Vandervelde, S. D. (2007). An Empirical Examination of COBIT as an Internal Control Framework for Information Technology. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8, 240-263.
43. Van Grembergen, W. (Ed.). (2004). Strategies for Information Technology Governance. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
44. Van Grembergen, W., & Dehaes, S. (2007). Implementing Information Technology Governance: Models, Practices and Cases. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
45. Webb, P., Pollard, C., & Ridley, G. (2006). Attempting to Define IT Governance: Wisdom or Folly? Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
46. Weill, P. (2004). Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top Performing Firms Govern IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(1), 1-17.
47. Weill, P. & Ross, J. (2004). IT Governance: How Top Managers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
48. Williamson, O. E. (1987). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.